Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Fighting
 
windowtop
windowtop
81 user reviews

4.2/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
9.7
4
7.5
8
3.4
15
3.7
16
2.4
12
1
2
4.2
57
Women:
Votes:
9
1
2
4
2.2
9
-
0
6.7
3
6
1
3.7
19
Total:
Votes:
9.6
5
5.9
14
3.2
26
3.7
16
3.3
15
2.7
3
4.2
81
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 81)

Trying to cash in on the UFC craze, but falls short in a huge way, do I smell "fighting 2" I sure hope not! Although it probably only costs 20 grad to make this crap so...
1/10
9.9.2009 - michjulien@ - age: 36-49
56 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Movie looked promising but it went nowhere. Man when is Channing going to hit his home run. The romantic twist was almost nonexistent and by the time something happens you don't really care. The fighting scenes are alright but nothing spectacular. Pass.
3/10
1.9.2009 - sacoca_@ - age: 26-35
408 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I can't even remember what this movie was about. Didn't hold my interest at all. It would have been nice if the main actors e-nun-ci-at-ed a little... could not understand the mumbling.
1/10
14.6.2009 - groleau-s@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Scenes to close up... needed more action in the fighting part...
6/10
27.5.2009 - g_rjohn@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I find it comical that many people are giving this movie a 1 out of 10. What were they expecting to watch? You go to an action or fighting movie knowing you wont be seeing a movie that will be up for academy awards. If you like fights, it has some great scenes, and I dont know what many of the reviewers are talking about with bad acting, Terrence Howard does a great job.
7/10
16.5.2009 - jmckee11@ - age: 26-35
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
There was no 0/10 so I had to pick 1/10. This should have been a made for TV movie, even then it would be only a 3/10 at best. Where was the action? In and out of sleep, awake only for the moments that made me think," is something gonna happen soon? "
1/10
13.5.2009 - bartytart@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie was really done well. They had really good actors, really was a feel good movie! Recommend it to those who loved Gladiator and Rocky!
10/10
13.5.2009 - sweet_angel_27@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Im depressed to read the reviews because I really wanted to see this movie... I love Terrance Howard, but [...] now I don't know if I wanna go see it.
5/10
12.5.2009 - janessagreen@ - age: 18-25
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I really liked this movie, because it was a never give up story. It was a little choppy in places but overall I liked it. I also liked the ending which surprised me.
7/10
12.5.2009 - skyjazz@ - age: 36-49
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I enjoyed the movie considering I hadn't previously heard of it or seen any trailers. I am a fan of Terrence Howard but completely hated his part... the gay tone he played did not sit well. But overall, storyline, etc... it's not one of those wait for DVD movies... was a good watch.
7/10
12.5.2009 - misstriss@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
One of the worst movies ever! It was very predictable, boring, and the production was awful! If you are 9 years old you might enjoy it, otherwise don't waste your money. Don't even rent it, or view it even if it's free!
1/10
12.5.2009 - bignj@ - age: 26-35
14 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Worse movie I've seen in years - walked out and got a refund. Really bad camera work - the boom mike was in half the scenes; fight scenes were so jerky you couldn't follow the characters; poor script and BORING!
1/10
11.5.2009 - lsconsulting@ - age: 50+
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Everything good was in the preview. It was typical, and predictable. Everything that happened I saw coming a mile away.
3/10
10.5.2009 - tweetybrd145@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This movie wasn't the best but it was not HORRIBLE. The fight scene are really good but the background story is not that good. The romantic side of the movie was not good.
6/10
10.5.2009 - nba_basket45@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was really good!!! And Channing Tatum is so hot!!! I love him. It's hard to believe he's 29!!
9/10
10.5.2009 - soccersuraya101@ - age: 1-12
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
OOHH @#! %% there is no rating for 0/10 thats my real rating this movie is by far the worst movie I have ever seen in my entire life [...] it was the most boring fighting movie I almost wanted to walk out by the first half hour!!! IT IS STUPIddd I CANT BELIEVE I WASTED MY $@#!! &* MONEYY!!!
1/10
9.5.2009 - sweetbella_76@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Movie was terrible... horrible acting... bad story line... no action... so much potential down the drain.
2/10
9.5.2009 - hold0032@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Honestly... I was very disappointed!!! I expected a lot of action... and really the only action in this movie you can see it through the trailer... I lost interest in the movie from the beginning... there is no background story about the main character, the love story sucks!!! Obviously the producer is not a romantic guy... nor someone who knows action... VERY BAD don't waist your money... if you really wanna see it wait till it comes out on DVD... NOT WORTH IT AT ALL!!!
2/10
8.5.2009 - taniabball_10@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Probably the dumbest movie I've ever seen. Ever. Terrible acting, terrible script, a middle school student could do better!
1/10
8.5.2009 - theodore177@ - age: 18-25
6 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I cannot believe I sat through this whole movie. I've never trashed an action or fighting movie cause you know what to expect, but this movie takes the cake... by far the worst fighting movie ever!! From the acting to the ending to you name it... HORRIBLE!
1/10
7.5.2009 - a_yayon@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Terrible terrible movie. Left half way. Only ones who liked this tripe if you notice are the 13-17 year olds. Avoid at all costs or prepare for a lifetime of regret.
1/10
7.5.2009 - ailassar@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Total joke don't waste your money check out old classic Hard times instead about bar fist boxing in the 70's.
2/10
7.5.2009 - bluedog652@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I almost laughed out loud while watching this movie, and it wasn't because it was actually funny... it was just sooo pathetic!
1/10
5.5.2009 - qnemkz@ - age: 26-35
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This is about as bad as it can get. Terrible story, bad scripting, inept acting. All around terrible. Hard to believe anyone makes rubbish like this. We need a zero rating.
1/10
5.5.2009 - clarke10999@ - age: 36-49
82 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The only good thing in this movie was looking at Channing Tatum. There wasn't enought fight scenes, and the acting was TERRIBLE!
1/10
4.5.2009 - laskdjfh@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 




Yeah, expected way more then that seemed like they just improvised the lines and sounded ridiculous the plot was scatter brained fight scenes were even bad.
2/10
4.5.2009 - claycoke11@ - age: 18-25
82 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I found the story kind of boring, I almost leave. It is a bit predictible.
6/10
4.5.2009 - mariette,robichaud@ - age: 50+
187 reviews - click to view
One reply - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie is soo dumb! Do not pay to see this!!!
1/10
3.5.2009 - sarahchasse@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Where do I begin? Unemotional acting, terrible script, poor picture quality, non-existant sound, and no character development. I felt like walking out in the first 1/2 hour but stayed to enjoy the extra buttered popcorn with cola.
1/10
3.5.2009 - mjlapratt@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Oh my goddd. This movie was probably the worst I've seen in ages, if not EVER. Completely aweful acting, no chemistry whatsoever, the fight scenes were aweful and filmed shakily, the storyline was completely non existant. We sat there through the whole movie hoping it would get better and all I could think was that I'd rather be doing ANYTHING else. I waited for a Channing Tatum no shirt scene, and when it finally arrived (ONCE) he looked like a 35 year old man. Nasty. Worst movie ever, please don't waste your time or money. I feel like they should have paid US to watch that. Ugh.
1/10
3.5.2009 - kendraa@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was terrable, full of filler material, and parts that it could of went with out.
1/10
3.5.2009 - victdero@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Terrible movie and very slow. I suggest if you want to see a good fighting movie go rent Never Back Down.
1/10
3.5.2009 - gc1rocker1@ - age: 13-17
9 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Bad acting, bad camera work. It was horrible fighting as well, more of just an all out brawl. Don't waste your money on this movie.
2/10
3.5.2009 - onlineslacker@
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Brilliant movie just brilliant, like wow... brilliant anyone who disagrees can be in the next movie with me getting their [...] kicked.
10/10
3.5.2009 - oxfordpirates@ - age: 18-25
First review.
One reply - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
All you people are crazy this movie was not bad at all there was lots of fighting.
7/10
3.5.2009 - dappermanrules@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Only thing good was the fighting scene's. What [...] me off was how bad the dialogue was, that was by far the worst script writing in history.
3/10
3.5.2009 - reckem_productions@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Great. A masterpiece. You have to see it. If you like action and fighting movies, this will be great for you.
10/10
3.5.2009 - crosby_lover_decce@ - age: 1-12
2 reviews - click to view
One reply - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
A must see, especially cause Channing Tatum. They should have more blood and a bit of gun fights.
9/10
2.5.2009 - joshitzko@ - age: 1-12
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The previews looked awesome for this movie I saw it opening night and it was terrible! I closed my eyes and tried to fall asleep in the theatre, that's how bored I was. I don't recommend wasting your money on this film if you want to see a good fighting movie then watch "never back down". The audience even 'boo-ed' at the end. Terrible.
3/10
2.5.2009 - roxy_princess137@ - age: 13-17
3 reviews - click to view
2 replies - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Good job. Really good movie go see it! One of the best fighting movie I have ever seen.
10/10
2.5.2009 - fif87@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It rocked. Man this movie is one of the best ones that came out this year and it is a lot better than all of the reviews are saying. Definitley worth watching, go check it out and you won't be dissaponted.
10/10
2.5.2009 - zak_lewis@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Seriously, the worst movie I have seen in a long, long time. I am down with the UFC, but this movie was donkey!
1/10
1.5.2009 - acauty@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to view
3 replies - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Omg the preview of this movie looks soo hardcore!! But I watched the movie and it was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, I normaly love movies with this guy, but this one was just awful, not worth the money, I would not recremend this movie to anyone who does not want to die of bordom, instead go party:P or just c another movie.
2/10
1.5.2009 - jonathanfurci@ - age: 13-17
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
First it was not what I expected. I expected more of an action movie. More of a standard down and out guy has to fight to realize his dream. What I got was some kind of crap attempt to merge Hustle and flow with some monsyllabic teen heartthrob. Just because Terrance Howard worked in Hustle and Flow doesn't mean it works here. The dialog was so nonsensical that I wondered if the characters were supposed to be mentally challenged. The plot such it was had massive holes in it. The fight scenes were unimpressive (the only thing that did keep me from giving this a 1 was a little bit of ferocity in some of the fights) Zulay Henao is quite attractive maybe she will appear in a movie where she actually acts. The "bad guys" in this movie were so unbelievably cheesy. If I wasn't away from home on work with nothing else to do I would have walked out. Terrible.
2/10
1.5.2009 - jamientrish@ - age: 36-49
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This is literally one of the worst movies I have ever seen, and I am usually not that hard on movies. The acting is horrible, the fighting is unrealistic and hard to follow, the dialogue doesn't even make sense half the time - it feels like the characters are having two different conversations rather than with each other, there is not enough background information on any of the characters to really get into the movie at all. Basically it is just horrible. People got up and left during the movie which I have rarely ever seen. Even having a hot lead actor did NOT in anyway make up for this movie. Seriously, don't go!
2/10
30.4.2009 - tayja_@ - age: 18-25
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I usually do not take the time to write a reviews about movies I see, but I had to do what ever I could to stop people from seeing this movie. It is the worst movie I have ever seen & that is saying alot when you consider I see about 2 to 3 movies a week. The only "Fighting" you will want to do with this movie is fight to get your time & money back!
1/10
30.4.2009 - seanzimmer@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The only good thing in this movie is that Channing is in it!! For a fighting movie the fight scenes were poor not exciting and all of them were to quick lol. Terrence's performance was kinda bad he sounded like he was high the whole movie... Channing did ok hes lucky he is good looking because that I the only thing that was interesting!
6/10
29.4.2009 - hoodie316@ - age: 18-25
15 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
What a mess... I don't even know where to begin from the story, the acting & even the fight scenes...
5/10
29.4.2009 - sentenza99@ - age: 26-35
351 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Possibly the worse movie I have ever seen, the writing in it seemed like a highschool student wrote it and the acting was mediocre. The grandma and the totally random screen shots is was kept it barable... dont waste your time or money.
1/10
29.4.2009 - rbroberge@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Boring, predictable, bad acting, not a lot of fights (3) story kind of lame. Its kind of Fake REALLY fake. Except for those things I really enjoyed my sleep and the free movie (thx friend)
4/10
29.4.2009 - brandon_drink_beerlao@ - age: 13-17
9 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
windowtop
windowtop
Note: Reviews posted on this page are personal opinions expressed by our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.
Click for other reviews:
[1-50]  [51-81]  

windowtop
windowtop
Did you see ''Fighting''?

How do you rate this movie?



Please elaborate. Write your comment here:




Your age:     Male:   Female:
(optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
The first part of your e-mail (before the @ sign) and your age group will be published.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.


windowtop
windowtop







Home · Top 10 · Playing · Upcoming · Trailers · A to Z · Theatres
 DVD Calendar · Blu-ray · Shopping Cart
Promotions · Change City · Contact Us · USA · Français
 
Copyright © 1996-2009 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.