|
Showing all 43 reviews...
|
|
 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Ok this movie has become my fav. Movie ever (my second is Interview With The Vampire) oh my god Gerard Butler is so damn fine is this movie. The story line is great also. At first I didn't get it when they did flash backs, but I finally got it (for people that have seen the movie they now what I meen by that)so if you havent seen this movie yet I suggest you rent it.
10/10
28.9.2004 -
frosted_ice7393@ - age: 13-17
Dracula 2000 was a good take on the original myth. Dracula had many of the same charateristics as the original Dracula. The story has connections with religion and sexuality which are symbolic to Dracula's charater. I think it was well done.
7/10
11.10.2003 -
lavender_57@ - age: 18-25
I loved the movie! But what does Vlad Tepes(Dracul)has to do with Juda? The legend of Dracula and vampires comes from where I am living in Romania, Transilvania and I can most certanly tell you that Dracula has nothing to do with Juda!!! I liked Gerard Butle though. The movie it's ok but the story it's not clear enough.
6/10
3.9.2003 -
iuno_na@ - age: 13-17
Good concept but bad way of goin about it. Could have done it much better. Direction ok but leaves much more to be seen and hoped for. The worst one I ever saw though.
6/10
7.8.2002 -
tcllane@ - age: 13-17
It's the best movie I've ever seen!!! I personally think that Gerry Butler looks really amazing... !!! Don't get me wrong, I just LOVE him!!!!!!!!!!! His biggest fan.
10/10
17.5.2002 -
emmi,lanna@ - age: 13-17
My name is Nikki Jones I Love Dracula 2000 go move to see.
7/10
28.4.2002 -
nljones81@ - age: 18-25
It's not the best Dracula movie. Kind of BOR-RING. It wasn't the Dracula I wanted to see.
6/10
29.10.2001 -
edur_@ - age: 18-25
I loved the movie..... ! Gerard Butler is very very beuatiful. I love the film. ;)))
10/10
23.9.2001 -
sophia_barros@ - age: 1-12
Dracula 2000 had a whole lot going for it. The way they compared the biblical story to how Dracula came about was very unique. However, it went from a gothic and enchanting movie to a John Carpenter-esque, goofy horror film. Though, I must admit it held my attention throughout the film! Which I can't say for a lot of movies...
6/10
26.7.2001 -
lowery1232000@ - age: 26-35
This movie was great! It gave you a bit of detail and than let you ponder about what the underlying motives were of Dracula and Abraham until the end when all was revealed. The connection to Dracula's origins was well put and understood. This movie was sexy, scary, and fun all in one!
10/10
1.2.2001 -
smilerealbig@ - age: 18-25
Interesting and original spin on the Dracula legend. Witty dialogue makes up for some shabby camera work. This movie may not be great, it might not even be good, but it sure is FUN.
7/10
30.1.2001 -
lone_man@ - age: 26-35
Being a dracula movie fan, I was very excited to go see Dracula 2000. Wes Craven does make good Dracula movies, but I must say he completely missed the boat with this movie. The only good thing about this movie was that the ending was not predictable, but it was to far fetched. I was so disappointed with this movie and I do not recommend it to anyone.
3/10
30.1.2001 -
jennifer_mouti@ - age: 18-25
This movie started off promising but after Dracula got to America, it just sucked. The plot was just weak and the ending was worse. The movie never felt complete at all and was very anticlimactic after the first 20 minutes. Top it off with some cheese and poor acting by the vampires and you get a B movie.
5/10
16.1.2001 -
bluurr@ - age: 18-25
I think that the relation that the writer made with the bible and Dracula was a terrific concept. This was a complete different aspect to our famous evil vampire. Tis said that Dracula has been overdone and should be put to rest for good, although I do appreciate a good original remake. Go, enjoy yourselves, go see Dracula 2000.
9/10
16.1.2001 -
dlepine@ - age: 18-25
This movie was pretty good. Not the best out there but worth seeing. I liked it. I actually jumped at some parts and it had action and suspence to keep u watching. Overall petty good.
7/10
13.1.2001 -
sb_rubberdukki@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I don't think this movie was good at all. No affence to the people who liked it. They make dracula seem like some very hot guy looking for women to seduce! It was very confusing, andit was so obviouse that everyone BUT the simon and daughter were going to die. I mean seriously! Is the producer trying to tell us that Jesus was a vampire? I don't think so!
1/10
5.1.2001 -
dark_angel798@ - age: 13-17
It was incredibly good, like the best movie I saw this year. I really liked it and I recommend it to all people of all ages!! It's as if you're in the movie... There's a lot of action and suspense... But it's scary too!!! Anyways, yeah seriously, go see it right nooooowwwwwwwwww!!!
10/10
5.1.2001 -
girlie369@ - age: 18-25
It's not as bad as it could have been, but it was a sleazy marketing ploy to attach Wes Craven's name to it when he didn't even sit in the director's chair. But at least Craven could have casted the movie! I can think of hundreds of actors who could play Dracula better. Christopher Lee, Gary Oldman, Gary Coleman for that matter! Even Carl Anderson could have played the role better! Geraard Butler's Drac disappoints.
5/10
3.1.2001 -
dukeforrest@ - age: 13-17
Well, not too bad. The version is indeed different, a little far-fetched I'd say... But I liked it very much, even jumped a few times! The actors are not brilliant though... I would recommend it only to people who like horror movies (not like some people who sat beside me! ), so as not to scream during the whole movie!
7/10
2.1.2001 -
alexnatdylan@ - age: 18-25
I loved this movie. Thats all I can say. Dracula was seductive and well... HOT. Ok but that wasn't all ^_^ the beginning was full of suspense, in the end it got a little boring and things went a little too fast but all in all it was pretty good. Not perfect, but like I said, pretty good.
8/10
2.1.2001 -
xxxxlingxxxx@ - age: 18-25
I thought it was good. All through the movie my friend and I were like, that girl looks like vitamin C! And now I know that it is. At one part, a guy jumped out and I trew all the popcorn in the air! I think it was good because the killing and all that started at the beginning and not in the middle like most movies, and I also think it was a bit confusing because they tell you things at the end that you should've known at the beginning. Well, it was good.
7/10
1.1.2001 -
charlies_angel93@ - age: 13-17
Interesting movie. Kept me in my seat. The actors, although I didn't recognize most of them, did a good job. I think it was worth seeing so did my companion.
7/10
1.1.2001 -
pheonix,0@
Yummm good popcorn while I watched the movie, it was good.
10/10
1.1.2001 -
therealslim@ - age: 13-17
Pretty good movie kinda scary but worth seeing on a big screen.
6/10
31.12.2000 -
tigger181979@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Good visuals, but not enough suspense. Interesting theory the writer has on the origin of vampires, explains some but not all of the vampiric weaknesses. And I thought silver was for werewolves? Acting was good, even if I have never heard of most of the actors before.
7/10
29.12.2000 -
aht@ - age: 36-49
This movie was the best I've seen in a couple of years!!! It's amazing!!! It's a bit scary but it's good man!!!!
9/10
29.12.2000 -
satans_child15@ - age: 13-17
An ok movie. Definitely a different twist on the most famous Vampire of all time.
7/10
29.12.2000 -
rford@ - age: 26-35
A way cool twist to the Dracula story. You must enjoy Wes Craven's style to enjoy this movie. So what if the 2 main actors are unknown. Gerard Butler, who plays the prince of darkness is phenomenal and very credible. If you enjoy classic horror flicks, you'll love this version of dracula.
9/10
28.12.2000 -
suzannecharbonneau@ - age: 26-35
I expected a more bloody or scary movie. Disapointing for a Wes Craven movie.
6/10
28.12.2000 -
loserdave@ - age: 26-35
| 
