CinemaClock   
Edmonton    
  Français 
Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Jurassic Park 3
 
windowtop
windowtop
186 user reviews

6.5/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
9.2
9
6.2
27
6.3
35
5.7
29
5
15
5.7
3
6.2
118
Women:
Votes:
8.3
3
7.6
18
6.7
16
6.7
8
6.9
9
-
0
7.1
56
Total:
Votes:
8.6
14
6.8
47
6.4
53
5.9
37
5.8
27
5.7
3
6.5
186
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 186)

Joe Johnston sucks! This movie is awfully terrible, the pace is unsustained, and is way too fast. It's a thrill ride, but goes weak in entertainment. Secondly, it's pointless, it does nothing to the series or characters besides the fact that raptors are very intelligent creatures. Thats about it. Everything else was just bad, the writing was terrible, the directing was terrible. Please put this in the bad horror movie section, this doesn't belong with Steven Spielberg, it isn't worthy.
2/10
31.5.2008 - n,oved@ - age: 13-17
53 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Can't say any more than, I am Deflated.
6/10
18.12.2006 - g,kronstal@ - age: 13-17
24 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
JP 3 was definitely not as good as the first. I liked it because once again Sam neil is in it. I love him. JP 3 had a horrible plot. For JP 4 maybe show some tourists and them running for their lives!!!
6/10
31.5.2004 - footballstar000@ - age: 1-12
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Not bad but not great.
6/10
1.4.2004 - joblagdon@ - age: 36-49
178 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It was one of the best movie I'v ever seen. Lot's of emotions and great scenario!!! -Leonn-.
9/10
29.2.2004 - leonn4@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Bad bad bad, spielberg and williams come back!
1/10
5.1.2004 - andreas_pedersen@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
A very good film to be seen. The new dinosaures were very cool, but we can't see a lot of them like the ankylosaurus, stegosaurus, triceratops, compys... but a good film to be seen..
8/10
15.12.2003 - munna,frederick@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Not a bad movie. The special effects are amazing, but the storyling was lacking something HUGE! Definitely not as good as the first two.
6/10
27.11.2003 - k4m4caz1@ - age: 13-17
50 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Better than the second one. I liked very much.
8/10
30.9.2003 - mroviram@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was an okay movie, better then the secound one! I have but just one question who sails near an island with dion's on it that would think nothing other then to eat you? The effects and acting was great though. One last thing though (L)Alessandro Nivola(L) is sooo hot and he better be in the 4th!!! Looking forward!
9/10
21.8.2003 - natalienoodle12@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The movie was dumb. I liked the 1 one and the 2 one 10 times better. Don't see it.
2/10
21.5.2003 - actr206@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The best dinosaur movie in the universe. Steven Spielberg can really direct. I loved it!!!! I'm waiting for jurassic park 4. Don't keep it too waiting!
8/10
13.4.2003 - mehradt@ - age: 13-17
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought the special effects were neat.
9/10
21.3.2003 - amkerr@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Great movie and a sweet Sam Neill!
8/10
10.2.2003 - julia,orli@ - age: 13-17
2 reviews -