|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 117)
|
|
 |
I cant beleive I even rented this, I knew it would be bad and there was no suprise.
2/10
20.9.2006 -
tsferg@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Too bad I couldn't put 0 as a rating. 1 is way to high. Worst comedy ever. The first one (Dumb and dumber) was a classic (20 out of 10) This one just plain suck. I must of watch the first one about 20-30 times and maybe more. This one, about 2/3 of the movie saying that it had to must at least a little bit funny. NOT!!![...]
1/10
21.5.2005 -
falconcg@ - age: 26-35
Pathetic acting and not many jokes and the jokes were lame. The only good joke was when the guy is screamin over crap on his car. It wasn't a histarical joke but it still [...] pretty bad.
2/10
1.2.2005 -
bam_morland@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
Not as good as the first, but good in its own way! '.
8/10
20.2.2004 -
tracey_armstrong52@ - age: 18-25
In 1981, this movie might have been a little funny, but without Jim Carry this one fell flat on its back, the jokes were all stale to the max. If you make a sequel at least bring back the magic of Jim.
1/10
9.2.2004 -
bad_animation_man2003@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
[...] And in it's own way this movie was a masterpiece of it's time and a conquer of humor. Maybe it was a little childish. But what the hell do u expect from a Comedy named Dumb And Dumber. Comedy's are supposed to make u laugh no matter how rediculious the situation. It's a movie people. And a great movie. If u can't see that than your all blind and don't even deserve to write a review over the internet... So to the producers and writer of Dumb And Dumber, It was a very funny movie and I enjoyed it very much. It made me feel in a better mood coming out of the movie theater than I went in. Good Job...
10/10
12.1.2004 -
dex1177@ - age: 18-25
I was really disappointed with that film. I thought the real actors were playing in it. I didn't even finish watching it.
5/10
4.12.2003 -
melaniepouliot@ - age: 18-25
Hilarious, bob saget is my idol. No not as good as the first but still firkin hilarious. Plus when I saw it I had some crazy guy bobbin his head to the music so it put my vote to 12/10.
10/10
22.8.2003 -
b_a_baracus_@ - age: 13-17
I went to see this movie with my friends, they thot it might be one of those suprise movies that turned out good, but it was pathetically pointless, definently DONT waste your money on it. I wud rate it -10/10 if I cud.
1/10
16.8.2003 -
kkofcameron@ - age: 13-17
The first one was way funnier! This was pretty cheesy although there were one or two funny parts. The plot of the movie sucked though.
4/10
4.8.2003 -
pinkkmunkie@ - age: 13-17
This movie was an extreme flop!
1/10
3.8.2003 -
cesar_jen@ - age: 18-25
Soo funny. Chicks are for fags!
8/10
3.8.2003 -
ecko_man2k2@ - age: 13-17
Hey it wasn't the first on but still it was super funny!! Okay maybe it was because we were all tired and there was some guy in the front row that was laughing like an idiot. I still think I would have enjoyed it minus all those facts!
7/10
3.8.2003 -
laurasnider@ - age: 18-25
This movie was pretty good and quite quite funny. The acting was great they really did a good job re creating the characters. It wasnt as good as the first but it was well done.
8/10
27.7.2003 -
joelsipher_2@ - age: 13-17
A few people are being quite harsh with how the movie doesnt have Jim C. But this movie is VERY great the person they got to play him looks exactly like him, it is defanatly worth seeing!!!
10/10
25.7.2003 -
white_tiger_44@ - age: 1-12
This was the best movie I've seen in a long time!!!!!!!!! I took my 11 y/o sister to it, and we laughed our butts off!!!
9/10
22.7.2003 -
nykislove@ - age: 18-25
What a movie!! It was great! I cried so many times becuase there are some hilariouse parts in the movie. I reccomend you see it or else your missing out on a good laugh!
9/10
21.7.2003 -
b_man_hockey4ever@ - age: 13-17
Some of the parts were so funny I cried! It is a "must see movie". I highly recommend it.
8/10
19.7.2003 -
created2skate@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was so funny the dad of jessica thought sh** was all over his bathroom and car it's the most fun I had in a movie.
10/10
17.7.2003 -
kyle_norman@ - age: 13-17
It was alright but not the best movie ever made. Nothing like the original.
5/10
16.7.2003 -
sunchild_lv@ - age: 18-25
I laughed a couple of times, but even thought I won passes to the premier of this I still felt ripped off. Stay home and wash your hair instead.
4/10
15.7.2003 -
belanmc@ - age: 26-35
This movie was truly funny. I laughed non-stop. Jim Carey would have been proud to see himself in the early years. This movie actually had a plot and had talented comedic actors. I enjoyed how entertaining it was with all the innuendos that would go over kid's heads.
8/10
15.7.2003 -
blondebutsmart99@ - age: 50+
If your gonna make dumb and dumber #2 at least let Jim Carry be the star cause there is no sutch thing as dumb and dumber with out Jim Carry. This movie is not worth 7$ rent it for 4$ insted in short this movie is pure CRAP.
5/10
10.7.2003 -
noahrsmith@ - age: 13-17
What a piece of sh... movie. I couldn't beleive it... Stay away from it!
1/10
9.7.2003 -
fakeone@ - age: 18-25
This movie is ridiculously funny with a lot of funny things that continue into the other Dumb and Dumber movie...
10/10
9.7.2003 -
atto@ - age: 13-17
I thought this film was hilarious! The acting was excellent, the script was excellent, and the cast was perfect. I laughed untill I cryed!
9/10
7.7.2003 -
ccrewe8@ - age: 18-25
This movie was no where near as good as the first dumb and dumber. For one thing, whats a prequal or sequal without the same actors? Dumb and dumber is nothing without jim carrey. This was a sad attempt to be as good as the first one. Sure, there were a few funny parts, maybe 2 or 3 but the first dumb and dumber was brilliant! Defenitly a classic.
2/10
6.7.2003 -
awesome_andrea89@ - age: 13-17
| 
