|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 63)
|
|
 |
Hilarious. This movie showed me all the cool things conjoined twins (as bob says it) can do. Matt Damon is da bomb.
10/10
2.1.2005 -
bobjoeiscool@ - age: 13-17
This movie was really funny... about time Matt Damon was in a comedy!! But the ending kinda sucked... but however... you have to see this!!!
7/10
3.5.2004 -
smithince@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I thought this movie was the best, when Cher always came in it was hilarious- This is a muct see movie!
10/10
20.2.2004 -
i_love_phil_4eva6969@ - age: 1-12
Aha this was a really good movie... it was well worth paying for and I cant wait to buy it when it comes out on dvd... go see it.
8/10
31.1.2004 -
kgdogs@ - age: 13-17
My Name is Chelsea T and am 10 yrs old. This movie was very well done and hillarious. A must see and even to be rented too! My little sister loved it as well. Please watch this movie, you will enjoy it!!! Ciao.
8/10
26.1.2004 -
chriselva@ - age: 1-12
Any movie that can drive out a laugh out loud from me will definitely get a good review. This movie is just so dumb, that it's hard to give it a bad review. Odd though, even though it's dumb, it has more heart than most movies out there today. LOVED THIS FILM! [...]
8/10
25.1.2004 -
glenjm@ - age: 13-17
Haha oh god, this movie is defiantly one of the stupidest movies I have ever seen. HOWEVER it is also very, very funny. Lots of stupid jokes but very humorus. Go see it if you want to have a laugh!
9/10
22.1.2004 -
babychick_69@ - age: 18-25
Loved it! Helarious!
10/10
19.1.2004 -
mandeepstone@ - age: 18-25
Wonderful, great and surprising. Not a stupit comedy like some people expect. Well done, the only flaw is they get along too good together. I would love to see it again. Has it's sad parts but it works.
9/10
17.1.2004 -
chrysennya@ - age: 36-49
I really liked the movie. The funny parts were the best parts. The other parts that werent that funny were the less favourite parts for me. I would see it again if it was in front of me. But if it was too far away then I would have trouble because I need glasses for things that are far away.
8/10
15.1.2004 -
frohmann@ - age: 26-35
I am a person with a disability and an advocate for disability rights and I loved this movie. How wonderful to see folks with such an obvious disability make life work in a positive way for them. This is a disability flick that doesn't make you aware that it is about disability and cultureal attitudes about disability. Rarely do I like disability issue movies because they come from the able bodied mind set and the able bodied get it all wrong. This one was right on. Thanks!
9/10
13.1.2004 -
dreambjo@ - age: 50+
This movie was really funny, an underated movie. I enjoyed thoroughly. The cast was fantastic. Matt Damon and Greg Kinnear display their ample talents. Cher as a snob is priceless, and Meryl Streep continues to show that she can handle dramatic and comedic roles. The real treasure in this movie though is Eva Mendes. After wasting her time in movies like '2fast 2furious, ' Mendes shows what truly a great actress she is, with immpeccable comedic timing.
8/10
12.1.2004 -
markhenry16@ - age: 18-25
Just another goofy comedy--nothing to get excited about... in fact I'm surprised Jim Carrey wasn't in it. When I first saw ads I thought it would be stupid... and it was... but in a funny way. A stupid movie that stupid people don't understand--"Walt: Where's she ever going to find another guy like you? Bob: I dunno... Chernobyl? "-- How many people in the theater laughed at that one? No one right? That's not because it wasn't a funny joke--it's because people are stupid.
7/10
11.1.2004 -
whitesox029@ - age: 13-17
I think this movie was halarious! I would give it 9 out of 10! It was amazing!
9/10
7.1.2004 -
twinkletoez64@ - age: 18-25
First of all I agree with fredricwhite, this movie is not supposed to make you think, it isn't supposed to win an oscar it is just supposed to be a movie that you can enjoy and I enjoyed it a lot. Also Newscott31 needs to get a life, anyone that has that much time to write a novel for a review needs something better to do with his time.
8/10
6.1.2004 -
brewley@ - age: 18-25
Stuck On You was a funny movie. But why was Malcome in the middle in it? He is way too young for Cher and it wasn't that funny that they were going out in it. Matt Damon was really funny, and played the role well! I would see this movie again.
8/10
4.1.2004 -
dylan_lizzy@ - age: 13-17
WOW! What anawesome movie! The actors are great, the topics are great! Who could possibly ask for a better movie? I am so suck on this movie!
10/10
3.1.2004 -
mommys_precious_angel@ - age: 1-12
Eva Mendes is so very beautiful!!!
8/10
3.1.2004 -
piccolo10@ - age: 13-17
Bad. Oh, so bad.
1/10
2.1.2004 -
curlyk2002@ - age: 26-35
It was good good was it.
7/10
2.1.2004 -
blahblahblah@ - age: 13-17
It's one of those "sit back, don't think - and enjoy the stupidity".
6/10
31.12.2003 -
dlchick70@ - age: 36-49
First I was like..."Y r u badmouthing this film? " Then when I watched it I was like "Y r u goodmouthing this film? " is goodmouthing a word? Anywayz... waste of time... rubbish... filth. Watching it will only make you cry, cry because u wasted about 7 dollars on trash. Whoever likes this movie is either as dumb as the characters on the film or just don't understand what trash is on tv these days. DONT THINK ABOUT WATCHING THIS MOVIE! U WANT LAUGHS WATCH CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN.
1/10
30.12.2003 -
spongebob_telertz@ - age: 13-17
The movie is terrible. And It is very rude how could they make such a movie that makes fun of simese twins. I kno someone(s) that is a simise twin they are inseperatable. Save your money and if you wanna see this movie just wait till it comes to video and borrow it from a friend.
1/10
29.12.2003 -
polarkangaroo@ - age: 18-25
Save your money, this ones barely rental worth! I can't believe they were trying to be serious throughout the film about the subject of conjoined twins.
3/10
27.12.2003 -
deb,rob@ - age: 26-35
I would never even think of posting a message on one of these sites, but I have to get some anger out. Down right the worst movie I can remember seeing. I'd rather watch the Blair Witch Project in the first row and throw up all over myself than watch this movie again.
1/10
25.12.2003 -
rob_baba@ - age: 18-25
GO SEE RIGHT NOW... VERY FUNNY. People who say this movie is bad are guy, homosexuals who wouldnt know a good movie if one bit them in the ass!
10/10
25.12.2003 -
adz@ - age: 18-25
I had expected it to be a lot funnier. Only some parts were funny. The story wasn't bad. Worth seeing.
6/10
23.12.2003 -
sweetness_tx@ - age: 13-17
Not very worth watching. Very little parts that were funny, a bit boring.
6/10
23.12.2003 -
gi_joe90d@ - age: 13-17
This movie was full of crap. Avoid it.
1/10
23.12.2003 -
twisthandle@ - age: 1-12
I only gave this movie a 5 because of Eva Mendes... what garbage.
5/10
23.12.2003 -
the_greek_life@ - age: 13-17
This movie was terrible. My friend and I left after 20 minutes and we only stayed that long because we were unsure that the other thought it sucked. No one was laughing in the theatre. I don't understand how anyone could write that it was good - it was BORING.
2/10
23.12.2003 -
crap9000@ - age: 26-35
This movie was great... I think I am stuck on Greg Kinnear that little stud muffin. Espacio with him would be realll nice. YUM... HI Yaaa.
8/10
22.12.2003 -
igdoubleoe@ - age: 18-25
Horrible, bad... not funny..
1/10
22.12.2003 -
dana_elford@ - age: 18-25
Started slow, but actually got pretty good by the end, Not side-splitting or anything like that. Worth a look on a day when you need some light, politically incorrect humor..
7/10
21.12.2003 -
ltnovak@ - age: 50+
This movie was so boring and a little bit funny but still really bad I don't think anyone should see it unless you have the mentality of a 2 year old, then again...
3/10
21.12.2003 -
gking4@ - age: 13-17
This is the kind of movie you want to see again and again. GO SEE IT!!
8/10
21.12.2003 -
landono@ - age: 13-17
The movie was sooo boring but the gurls were hott lol.
1/10
21.12.2003 -
da_orangelo@ - age: 13-17
| 
