CinemaClock   
Edmonton    
  Français 
Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo
 
windowtop
windowtop
63 user reviews

5.9/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
-
0
8
10
6.2
6
4.3
10
5.4
5
2.3
3
5.8
35
Women:
Votes:
-
0
8.8
10
5.6
7
3.8
6
2.5
2
4
2
6
27
Total:
Votes:
-
0
8.4
20
5.9
14
4.1
16
4.6
7
3
5
5.9
63
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 63)

What do you expect? It is exactly what is says it is, unlike most of the other shlock coming out of Hollywood these days. Fun, mindless nonsense. Just laugh at it and walk away!
8/10
15.11.2005 - person_one@ - age: 36-49
22 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Super funny. Corney, but thats to be expected when you are going to see a Deuce bigalow movie! Its worth seeing.
7/10
20.9.2005 - nicola_golden@ - age: 18-25
10 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Pure Slapstick Comedy!! If you have a poor sense of humor, you'll definitely enjoy this one!!!
4/10
9.9.2005 - u_hv_reached_pooja@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
One of the worst movies I've ever watched, I dont know how Rob Schneider accepted this role on the first place. Anyways, I waisted my money on this movie, horrible, not a funny movie, kind of stupid in fact!
1/10
8.9.2005 - cmdte@ - age: 26-35
9 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It's a good thing no one was sitting next to me, at least I was able to put my head down and sleep for a bit. The first one was good, the second one is horrible. Writing, directing, acting... etc. ZERO! Not even on DVD!
3/10
5.9.2005 - pozcanon@ - age: 26-35
51 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The movie was good it was funny but there was some sick parts.
7/10
4.9.2005 - geoff_molloy@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I really dont get the point of makeing this movie. Some scary parts but not really a horror film... wait a minut it's a comedy?! Jesus it's a pg 13 but anyone over the age of 14 would just find it stupid and repetitive. This movie SHould be a horror flic. Its scary, Rob Schneider acting. :0.
1/10
30.8.2005 - darkcloud140@ - age: 18-25
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
If you liked the first one, you'll love this one!! Laugh all through the movie and afterwards too.
8/10
29.8.2005 - haywoodjablome97@ - age: 36-49
9 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I really didn't enjoy this movie at all. If you want a sexually driven movie than this the one for you. Most of the jokes are about sex in one way or another. Come on! There are wittier ways of expressing humour than that! Complete crap! Don't even wait for the DVD.
2/10
27.8.2005 - atomic_fission@ - age: 26-35
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I really enjoyed this movie because of the cliches, bad potty humour and homophobia at its funniest. There was never a dull moment. I laughed all through it.
7/10
27.8.2005 - blondebutsmart99@ - age: 50+
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I think this movie, halarious... a must see. Better than the first one... haha. Good job. Go see it now!
10/10
27.8.2005 - summer_paradise3@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Every once in a while a movie makes it to the big screen with absolutely no redeeming qualities. This is one. The movie tries to carry itself on filthy language, dumb jokes (? ) and more filthy language instead of a story and actual humor. In a word: TRASH.
1/10
24.8.2005 - cmandryk@ - age: 50+
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Couldn't stop laughing, it's great!
10/10
24.8.2005 - liam_pelchat@
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Extremely funny. I cannot see how anyone would not enjoy it.
10/10
24.8.2005 - kisses69@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was hilarious; even better than the first.
9/10
24.8.2005 - helen_of_troy1000@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was better than the first, but you can't go in expecting a oscar worthy performance. So considering what it is it's great for a laugh. I think those who gave it bad reviews didn't "get it".
7/10
24.8.2005 - shoehorn@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Definitely a Good Show! The first part is definitely better, but isn't that how it goes? I wouldn't pass the opportunity to see this one again.
8/10
24.8.2005 - mykidsmom@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The movie was ok, but im giving it a nine because deuces new girlfriends(sry if I spoiled it for you) is the hottest girl I have ever seen in my friggen life.
9/10
23.8.2005 - poppills@ - age: 13-17
8 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was an Alright movie... they kinda went overboard on the whole "penis on the nose" bit. I would have to say the first movie was the better one, and it wasn't so into the Private areas.
6/10
22.8.2005 - dene_princess66@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This is the first movie that actually made me jump out of my seat squealing with laughter since Wedding Crashers. I noticed that people in my own age range seem to love this movie, and anyone older thought it sucked... well, it really depends on your sense of humor (if it's pretty bad like mine), and your maturity level. I went with my boyfriend to see it, and just a word of advise... DO NOT TAKE YOUR PARENTS TO SEE IT WITH YOU!!! You will regret it very much. It really brought out the immature side of me, which isn't always a bad thing right? Rob Schnieder gets a standing O from me =D.
10/10
22.8.2005 - dkhr@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The first movie was a lot better. Was quite disappointed with the new one. Not as funny as it could have been.
5/10
22.8.2005 - zingerdaddy@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Far worse than the first one. Cheesy jokes and vulgar plot.
1/10
21.8.2005 - jollyj22@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Bad jokes, should never have attempted a sequel.
1/10
21.8.2005 - lindap@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Nope, it was the same as the original with different chicks in it! Whats the point? Anyway, should never of made a cheap sequel!
4/10
21.8.2005 - terriparsons28@ - age: 26-35
9 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 




HILARIOUS MOVIE! Way better than the first one no doubt. Eddie Griffin really made his character hilarious in this movie compared to the last one and the things to happen to Deuce were way funnier this time around. Definitely worth seeing this movie.
9/10
21.8.2005 - slix13@ - age: 13-17
94 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought that Deuce was very funny in this movie and was very serious and funny about his role in this movie.
10/10
20.8.2005 - agentd_opp@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
[...] It was so boring :( it was funny in like 2 parts but the rest sucked... dont go... very disapointing!
5/10
20.8.2005 - shadow_war20032000@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Well I see a lot of people gave this movie a poor review stating that the movie was very sexual in nature. Well if you look at the title "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" gigolo being the key word, one should be able make the assumption that there is going to be a lot of sexual innuendo. It's a good movie and keeps you laughing most of the time. I would definitely reccommend it to young adults that have a good sense of humour.
8/10
20.8.2005 - rico_stabbs@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
All you people who are giving this movie less than a 5, look at it for waht it is... its COMEDY and it did the job, it was hilarious. If you cant open yourself up to humour... then you should never watch a comedy... Id go and see it again. Get off your stuck up seats and laugh a bit.
10/10
18.8.2005 - the_gr8_1ne@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
NOT a children's film. It's all sex-related, which isn't always a bad thing, sometimes it can make a really good movie, but this one fails. It's goofy, and not funny at all. It's repetitive and monotonous. No redeeming features whatsoever. I'm very generous by giving this movie a 6/10.
6/10
18.8.2005 - famous_nobody@ - age: 13-17
6 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply