|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 244)
|
|
 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was so good how they got to go around the house but after the door locks the guy xavier tries to get the antidote in the safe for himself. For me the coolest trap was the hand trap where addison goes but after her one hand is in and she drops the antidote spilling it she puts her other arm in. The movie is a really gruesome filled with lots of blood... oh yes there will be blood.
8/10
30.7.2008 -
kingconnorkk@ - age: 1-12
Pretty cool they got too move around the house in this one better then them being locked up in the bathroom LOL.
10/10
27.10.2007 -
gagelible@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Excellent film! Mais il n'est tout de même pas meilleur que le premier, domage!
9/10
17.5.2007 -
jft64bass@ - age: 13-17
Definitely worth seeing, keeps your eyes on the screen, of course quite graphic!!
9/10
8.3.2007 -
whitneyisodd@ - age: 18-25
In some ways, it was better than the first. O= Go see it now!
10/10
16.11.2006 -
tanu327@ - age: 13-17
Exactly the same as saw1 even worse-too much violence and blood-not at all mysterious if you saw saw1 first-good filming angles.
5/10
1.11.2006 -
nassim_sedaghat@ - age: 18-25
Genius, well written script. Another uexpected ending. If you have seen Saw 1, I strongly recommed you to go and see this one. If not, either watch saw 1 first or... Just go watch it.
10/10
25.10.2006 -
amin,majidi@ - age: 18-25
While Saw II won't ruin the brilliant 2004 original, it definitely doesn't do much to add to the experience for you. The sequel is unintelligent in every sense of the words, the writing is nonsensical, the characters are all idiots, and the director is barely competent enough to string the movie together. He doesn't bring anything new to the film either, rather he does a lousy impersonation attempt of James Wan, the director of the original, mimicking his photographic and editing style to the last detail, while not adding any of his own ideas to the picture. Overall it's entertaining, but insulting to the audience's intelligence, we deserved a lot more.
4/10
24.10.2006 -
the_crazycanuck@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
I needed two viewings to watch this film. In my first attempt to watch it, I was bored and checked out about 30 minutes in. The second time, I stuck with it and it got much better. I wouldn't buy it but if you liked the first one, it's better than a lot of sequels I've seen. It's worth renting.
6/10
23.10.2006 -
davidlemoyre@ - age: 26-35
Hmm Not as good as the first one, too much bulshit, that's what I think, hell if they would have brought the CSI people they would have solved the case no problem :P, in my opinion they made the detectives look way to incompetent, at least that's what I think, and also somehow the ending was a bit predictable, in the way that there was ganna be a twist to it.
6/10
21.10.2006 -
sustac@ - age: 13-17
Just as good as the first, tons of suspense!!! I loved the ending. So many subtle clues throughout, you have to watch it a second time to catch them!!! Can't wait for the third.
9/10
16.10.2006 -
chercrawford@ - age: 26-35
Not as good as the first 1 but still an absolutely amazing movie with another perfect ending that was unpredictable.
9/10
9.8.2006 -
mark_june@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Great movie! Worth seeing the end will leave you hanging. If you have watched the movie its worth seeing again because all of the difficulties like the girl sticking her hand in the thing that cuts her wrists so she bleeds to death well if she looked a little harder she could have foun the key at the back of the box and she wouldnt have died... and it really does teach you the value of life... you shouldnt take if for granted thats for sure. And always live your life to the fullest. The end has a very big twist too cant wait till the 3rd hopefully the 3rd will be the last one...
10/10
12.7.2006 -
aerosmith_smile92@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
I loved t |
