|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 158)
|
|
 |
*Yawn* This movie is okay if your seriously bored and it just happens to be on the television set. One of the free channels, though. DO NOT BUY IT! Where did she come from? The babysitter, in real life? Why did they pick her for this role? I thought this movie could have been a lot better if they had chosen a better actress, she can't fake cry. I guess in the action parts she was ok, but overall, thumbs down.
5/10
9.3.2008 -
spongebob_freak_95@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was alright, but I still dont know why the murderer just came near the end. And I also dont know why the movie only showed his face in the end. When the babysitter found that guy under water, only one rock kept him under there and that seemed fake. If u want to see it go ahead, but dont make a deal out of it, its just the typical teen flick.
6/10
27.1.2008 -
rodshadow1@ - age: 13-17
Omg the house was AMAZING but other than that the movie was pretty boring... Basically some random babysitter on the phone and it wasn't scary at all... Oh well.
6/10
13.6.2007 -
mary_kateandash_44@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
10 dollars were put to waste as I paid for my ticket to see this "scary movie". Just like others it's advertising had me thinking it was worth a watch. I was quite disappointed when I noticed the "threatening phonecall" scenes were being prolonged. I was expecting the movie would later go on and tell us who and where this babysitter stalker came from. Jill Johnson's conversation with the evil babysitter stalker lasted longer than their cat and dog chase. The ending, I felt came a little to soon. And didn't leave the audience enough time to stick around for another sequel. Nice story line... disappointing movie.
4/10
25.7.2006 -
fightin_temptations@ - age: 13-17
Better then expected, the scoring really helps set the mood of the film.
8/10
22.6.2006 -
cfh_trendkill@ - age: 18-25
|
