|
Showing all 9 reviews...
|
|
 |
It wouldnt be the same without Sissy Spacek and William Katt. Enough said.
3/10
25.5.2008 -
x,gerard,is,pretty,x@ - age: 13-17
I've seen the rage carrie 2, it's good I like the movie I wish I've the movie on dvd.
8/10
7.1.2004 -
princess_cherokee04@ - age: 18-25
First of all, this movie is a masterpiece! I love it! Emily Bergl is great for Carrie 2! Hope that they will make a Carrie 3! My most favorite part is when Rachel gets her anger uncontrol, causing her to chop some heads, screwtinizing the whole head, burning bodies, blowing glasses, eyes-popping out, drowning... and whole lots of more... this is really a two-thumbs up movie! Everyone, it also has a story! A very bright story..."Every teens thinks terrible thoughts, Rachel's are deadly! " get your ass up and watch the movie! I bet ya you won't waste your time!
10/10
26.11.2002 -
anthony_nate@ - age: 13-17
Hey ummm Jason London is really hott!! Whats with his hair?!?! That little part is just not workin for him! He was much better in Out Cold!
8/10
7.7.2002 -
ranger6nw@ - age: 13-17
The best part of this movie? The scenes from Carrie (with Sissy Spacek)!
3/10
25.7.2000 -
razade@ - age: 18-25
The story was pointless! The Sequel was DUMB not even worth the $2.50. It's not the horror-suspense movie it seemed like really BOMBED in my mind!
1/10
22.5.1999 -
bigstat@
This movie REALLY REALLY sucked. It was an insult to the first Carrie!!!!! Carrie 2 was very boring, no good effects except towards the end, but what the hell was up with the vine??? This movie definitely was a waste of my 2.50 so go see the original Carrie please!
1/10
15.5.1999 -
magic_mushroom67@
Great special effects, but one was not necessary for the actual story. The tatoo was a nice touch but no valid reason for its presence when the vines start sprouting. Predictable story and ending but the effects are good enough for me to recommend it on cheapy Tuesday or a matinee.
7/10
29.3.1999 -
kaskit@
For those who saw the first Carry, it is a good sequel. They managed to make good parallels between the two movies without remaking the exact same film. It is also nice to see Jeremy London in a new role outside what he does on Party of Five.
8/10
16.3.1999 -
natdes@
| 
