|
Showing all 47 reviews...
|
|
 |
[...] There are some very poorly acted scenes by Garcia (doing his worst Pacino impersonation) and Judd. Both are capable of better acting. It is as if a scene is shot once and put into the film, no matter how bad. Also, there are plot holes you could drive a truck through. Watch it only if you've really nothing better to do, like read a magazine.
4/10
20.9.2004 -
thevgtech@ - age: 36-49
Why poor? Because it's predictable; you need maybe 20 min to figure it out.
3/10
3.9.2004 -
jfdesjardins75@ - age: 26-35
Great film. Kaufman is genius. San Francisco has never been filmed in such a way.
10/10
29.4.2004 -
foreowl@ - age: 36-49
it was a pleasant surprise not since the sixth sense have I been so surprised by the ending.
8/10
27.3.2004 -
coachmullan@ - age: 26-35
Poor acting all around, very predictable movie, waste of money, don't bother with this one!
3/10
20.3.2004 -
yvan_icarus@ - age: 26-35
Garbage, hold on to your money... acting is terrible / script is terrible / story line is terrible.
1/10
18.3.2004 -
barbiedoll@ - age: 26-35
Meh I thought iy was gonna be a murder movie but I was disapponited to find out it was a mystery :( but it was okay.
5/10
17.3.2004 -
mickeymouse@ - age: 13-17
The movie was slow and predictable. Judd has made many a better film as have Garcia and Jackson. Save your money and wait for the video.
4/10
17.3.2004 -
amnielson@ - age: 36-49
Meh-what can I say- typical movie for people who think they like movies- in reality, they just like dumb entertainment. Very predictable and very simple. Its actually the type of movie you know you have seen at least 4 other times with different titles, but you can't seem to remember which ones.
4/10
16.3.2004 -
uranusplease@ - age: 18-25
This was a good movie and worth seeing. The plot has a lot of twists, you really have to look and LISTEN to the movie.
7/10
15.3.2004 -
pilotdnd@ - age: 50+
This movie had a good story at the base of it, but it was ruined by some over-acting and it got to be quite predictable as it went along. Wait for the DVD.
5/10
15.3.2004 -
dhoward0817@ - age: 26-35
I didnt find this movie very "twisted" at all. There is the surprise at the end, but, it's not that much of a surprise. Two of my friends that I went to see this with actually fell asleep in the movie theatre (and im not kidding) not that great a movie but if you want to go see it, then go ahead.
6/10
13.3.2004 -
almondtart@ - age: 13-17
Best movie I have ever seen - seen it 4 times!!! Party drugs!!!
10/10
12.3.2004 -
alibrough@ - age: 18-25
This movie has been done lots of times in the past. You'll know who the culprit is right away. Always... the not so obvious. Pick a new plot!. please!
5/10
12.3.2004 -
alanis_melissa@ - age: 18-25
Clichés galore. You've seen this movie a hundred times, even if you never saw it. Acting is bad, screenplay is bad... But Ashley as always has a very pretty smile.
3/10
12.3.2004 -
jarofclay74@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
In just a few words:Don't waste your time nor your money. Wait until you can rent it for 1$.
2/10
11.3.2004 -
stephaneblais@ - age: 18-25
Terrible. Worst movie I've ever seen in my life. Acting is really bad, story is repetitive and ending is just so stupid. Waste of time and money.
1/10
11.3.2004 -
jitcondo@ - age: 18-25
Found this movie to be interesting. It had a good storyline and the ending surprised me. Worth seeing.
7/10
10.3.2004 -
elaine@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Aaarrrggghhh!!! So stupid! Don't see it at all!
1/10
9.3.2004 -
t_4_strain@ - age: 36-49
Absolutely riveting; it had me on the edge of my seat the whole time. Packed with suspense and intrigue, your brain was working overtime trying to figure out the identity of the killer. Incredible acting on the parts of Judd, Jackson and Garcia, making the movie a definite must see.
8/10
9.3.2004 -
jill_kendra@ - age: 18-25
Twisted is a bad movie because it's too predictable. The part about Ashley Judd's past was intriguing, but it didn't play out well. It was too far fetched and not believable at all.
5/10
8.3.2004 -
leanne,clements@ - age: 26-35
Great movie, Ashley was superb has always!
9/10
7.3.2004 -
sonny_th@ - age: 26-35
It was a wicked movie. I loved it that the guy I was with figured it out 15 minutes in! Plus, there were 4 previews. I love previews! Therefore, 10/10.
9/10
7.3.2004 -
the_barb@ - age: 18-25
Good movie. Judd plays an interesting character and is very sexy. Suspenseful - there are several possible ways the movie could come out, several possible killers, and it is not clear untill the laast 20 minutes or so which it will be.
8/10
6.3.2004 -
richardriot@ - age: 36-49
Good story, although probably better in paperback. The movie lacked the details that could have made this a real thriller. Definitely not a waste of time but could have been better written.
6/10
5.3.2004 -
dreamergirl_29@ - age: 26-35
Very Predictable ending... A let down from other Ashley Judd movies.
5/10
5.3.2004 -
tyler_mcintyre@ - age: 18-25
It is a good thing Ashley is good lookig because it the the only good thing about that no surprising movie.
4/10
5.3.2004 -
guy@ - age: 26-35
I don't really agree with most of the reviews so far... sure this movie was somewhat typical, but I thought it was worth seeing at the theatre.
8/10
4.3.2004 -
mindicanada@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I don't know weather any one else noticed, but this film seemed to be more a femanist movement then a drama. The only real drama was the difference between the brave reviews the adds gave and the overall preformence... Overall it was just frames wasted, I would only recomend going to see this film if you where looking for a nap.
1/10
3.3.2004 -
kate1_2_3@ - age: 13-17
I thought this movie was good and entertaining, quite suspenceful, a great saturday night movie.
8/10
3.3.2004 -
oxygen_112@ - age: 18-25
This movie stank... I was very disappointed. I ended up hating Judd's character- which defeats the objective of cheering for the heroine!
3/10
3.3.2004 -
km@ - age: 26-35
First time I left a movie theater, and that was 15m into the movie! Typical cop flick. So damn BORING!!!
1/10
2.3.2004 -
bigmike1989@
| | | | |
That was the bbbeeesssttt movie ever The acting was so good and so was the plot. The suspense was incredible. THe music waz awesome. I would recommend any movie with Ashley Judd. Everything was incredible. Go see it nnooww!!!
10/10
2.3.2004 -
amazinga@ - age: 26-35
It wasn't the most original, yet it still does manage to capture you for few moments. I did guess who the guilty one was before it reveal it to me. But it is a little tricky still. And like the title, there's a little twist to it. Not completely surprising, but still gets you in a way. It was not the best but still interesting. It's better than some of the movies out these days...
7/10
2.3.2004 -
cutyjewel@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Once again we payed to see a movie starring Samuel L. Jackson in one of his half assed performance. The movie was supposed to be suspensful, I found it to be very dull... Come on Jackson.
4/10
1.3.2004 -
big_bala14@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Don't waste your time and money. It was extremely predictable and pretty boring.
3/10
1.3.2004 -
zoepus@ - age: 18-25
This is another formula movie for Ms. Judd. With a black man as her mentor, she has been successful in the past with this type of moderately sexy, suspenseful movie but how long can her luck hold out. At best this is a rental on one of our cold winter evenings.
6/10
1.3.2004 -
bestest61@ - age: 36-49
Worst ever, avoid at all costs. Acting is terrible, story sucks and nothing makes any sense. Total waste of time and money. :(.
1/10
1.3.2004 -
ftaremi@ - age: 18-25
What a terrible movie. The "concept" was okay, but there was absolutely no character development or plot development. If you clued into the Zippo reference, it was blantantly obvious who the culprit was... no surprise. There wasn't any suprise or "twist" to this movie at all. It was only an hour and a half long, and for an hour of it, we were to believe the main culprit was this one particular person. However, there was no explanation as to why they thought this, they simply stated "this is the suspect" and that's it... Terrible, terrible, terrible. Very boring and anti-climactic.
3/10
1.3.2004 -
sn_halifax@ - age: 26-35
A so so movie, not really recommandable. Not such a bad story, but I didn't appreciate Ashley Judd's acting and the outline was so simple. A good TV movie.
5/10
29.2.2004 -
cynthia_6666@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
This movie is quite suspenseful, yet extremely typical. I knew what would happen right from the beginning, however, it is still enjoayble and worth seeing! Ashley Judd is an awesome actress, but I would have loved to see more of Samuel L Jackson!
8/10
29.2.2004 -
gaaaalit@ - age: 18-25
Low rated movie, not worth the tab to see. Time can be spent more productively elsewhere.
4/10
29.2.2004 -
patid66@
The characters were casted well, but I couldn't help feeling that the movie could have been better. It just seemed to drag in places and was predictable at times. One would probably obtain more suspense from reading the book versus seeing the movie.
6/10
29.2.2004 -
sunnysunflower32@ - age: 26-35
Honestly I loved it. It was a fine suspense movie.
7/10
29.2.2004 -
sacoca@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I've seen this movie a few times before. Ashley Judd in a crime drama... how original. Where is Morgan Freeman? Don't bother considering it. Go to Eurotrip.
2/10
28.2.2004 -
relyt05@ - age: 26-35
I found this movie fast paced and surprising. I enjoyed it. The ending was a surprise to me and usually I figure out the killer. A good one.
7/10
28.2.2004 -
hesson@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
This was a well made movie but any murder mystery fan will be able to spot the killer right away! They spoiled it for me by advertising it as having a 'shock ending', which told me immedaitely what the whole plot would be even before I went to see the movie! Still it's not a bad movie by any means, with some cliched performances common to most thrillers. There have been better thrillers and many much worse.
6/10
28.2.2004 -
marc1561@ - age: 26-35
| 
