Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Simone
 
windowtop
windowtop
49 user reviews

6.8/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
-
0
7
4
8
10
6.2
5
6.2
5
8
2
7.2
26
Women:
Votes:
-
0
7
2
5.9
7
5
1
6.2
5
5.5
2
6.2
20
Total:
Votes:
7
1
7
6
7.1
19
6
6
6.2
10
6.7
4
6.8
49
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing all 49 reviews...

Cleverly done. Al Pacino is good in it.
7/10
9.10.2005 - dalida_redon@
11 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Started out really good, got repetitive as the movie went along long and started to get silly towards the end. Really liked the concept though.
6/10
15.7.2005 - cfh_trendkill@ - age: 18-25
491 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I watched Simone over 100 times... It was great!! Very funny and dramatic... I loved it!
10/10
30.5.2004 - badboy15153119@ - age: 13-17
59 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It was all right. I had some chuckles. The story it told was a little far fetched (after one movie she's an icon ummmm no)I watched it on bell express I'm glad I didn't shell 10$ to see it.
6/10
20.7.2003 - tmpo@ - age: 36-49
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Despite all the bad reviews I've read, I watched this movie and was quite surprised. Simone is a highly original idea so the movie is quite interesting to watch. Al Pacino is just brilliant, he is an extraordinary actor and this part is quite good for him. The movie was not especially funny, but it was quirky and strange in a cute sort of way. If you've got a free night, check this film out. There are a lot of better movies out there but this is still pretty good.
7/10
14.2.2003 - tinybrend02@ - age: 13-17
36 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie was brutal... It was torcherous to watch. Cannot believe that Pacino would agree to make a movie this bad. AWFUL, and I mean AWFUL.
1/10
4.2.2003 - sakhaneft@ - age: 26-35
13 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Was not too impressed by the movie. Boring.
3/10
27.1.2003 - gdmccan@ - age: 50+
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Very good indeed.
9/10
26.10.2002 - theduke@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This was a very very refreshing change from Hollywood crap... & maybe much closer to the reality that we're in... than we might imagine.. Jarring, thus a masterpiece..
9/10
3.10.2002 - aztech612@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Slow paced movie, expected a lot more from Al Pacino.
6/10
23.9.2002 - bellisimaprincipessa@ - age: 18-25
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
A movie that has noting to be remembered but it is funny while watching. See it a tuesday night with a big cheap crowd. That's the best way to see this movie.
7/10
18.9.2002 - daehkcid2k2@ - age: 18-25
7 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It's a cool and good story...
8/10
16.9.2002 - breezesh@
8 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It is an excellent movie. Many stars were born and created thanks to their directors. After they became famous and turned their back on their director. The image publicity and all the artificial surrounding becomes the reality in the minds of the fans. The fans become so oppsessed with their star that even bad publicity will not sway their dovotion.
9/10
9.9.2002 - dalyabe@ - age: 50+
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The illusions produced by Hollywood and the shallowness of fame... all I can say is, it's been done before, and it's been done better.
5/10
6.9.2002 - blue0375@ - age: 26-35
7 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
[...] I realize we're pretty desperate nowadays looking for a "good" movie to talk/rave about... but Simone ain't IT!! I'm totally NOT surprised that this movie was made by the same people who made The Truman Show!! Once again they provide us with a movie that has NO ONE interesting in it... and to top it off, this movie was hilighted by a horrible performance by Pacino (proof that he ain't even CLOSE to being the COMPLETE actor that DeNiro is!
3/10
5.9.2002 - lynchmob450@ - age: 26-35
34 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Somehow interesting, however one does not have to be reminded of Hollywoods creative ability to grip audiences with one illusion (film) after another. However, if you need reminding, Al Pacino does an excellent job of portraying the disillusioned master of illusion (director) in this film. Fun to watch. A lot better then I expected.
7/10
5.9.2002 - rubyf4@ - age: 50+
10 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Simone wasn't too bad. It was a bit out there. It's one of those movies that I would wait for to watch on video.
6/10
3.9.2002 - angels4@ - age: 36-49
87 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Just ignore the guys flaming this movie. Ok it's not better than Gone With the Wind but it had some laughs and my kids liked it. I liked Pacino's soliloquies - decent acting. And I really like the overall message - Hollywood is tinsel town, it is very artificial, and a computer generated graphic is about equal to some of the shallow people out there. And it was done tongue-in-cheek.
7/10
1.9.2002 - rgreen144@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
One question - is Simone real or animated? If it's animated it's the best rendering I have ever seen and I work in Silicon Valley! Did anyone stay for the very end of the credits? ValerieH@best. Com.
9/10
31.8.2002 - valerieh@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This movie was so crappy. Don't they spend any time writing the dialogue? Lame lines. Weak Characters (even though there was a little bit of a personality to Victor Teranski, they are all pretty much uninteresting and not very believable). Some pretty cheesy parts. What was that love story? No wonder they have to use all this : is she real or not? " publicity to get people watching it.
2/10
31.8.2002 - happy_towel_girl@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Give it a miss and get it on video.
6/10
31.8.2002 - vmeil@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This was one of the worst, if not THE WORST, movies I have ever seen. Blah, Blah, Blah... insipid & banal. It was actually painful to watch talented actors have to spout such tedious, long-winded dialouge. And, not only was it bad, bad, bad, but it just went on & on & on. Please, do yourself a favour & stay home & prick yourself with pins. It will be more enjoyable, I guarantee it. I had to choose a rating of 1 because they don't give the option of choosing 0.
1/10
30.8.2002 - jtrf@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I'd like to vote a 1 but I have seen one movie worse then this insipid piece of nothingness. I view many movies a week and haven't seen anything as poorly written as this since "Even cowgirls get the blues". I couldn't believe this movie went on beyond the 2hr. mark as I was constantly checking my watch... not a good sign. A very week story line containing way to much dialog also a sign of a writer trying way to hard to make something happen. Needless to say we left when it became obvious that 2hrs of this movie wasn't enough and the pain I felt for the actors was going to continue. Even they couldn't save this one despite their considerable talent.
2/10
30.8.2002 - tschumm@ - age: 36-49
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Great movie! Worth seeing! It was so much fun watching. Very original. I was always smiling and laughing during the movie. It is one of those sit back and enjoy movies. Very fun.
10/10
29.8.2002 - goodmovie@ - age: 18-25
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 




So funny good story.
10/10
29.8.2002 - kb8_2@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I thought the movie would be much better, much more funnier. There were some scenes that were really boring but overall the movie was OK.
6/10
29.8.2002 - livnoprincess@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
What can I say really... I think this movie SUCKED so bad that I needed to leave before anything close to an end finally came! It was too long and very NOT interesting! The idea of the virtual world was not bad in itself but the context in witch it was put was terrible. I was very disappointed since I liked the actors that played in it. I still can't believe that this movie got a 7.9. I understand that we cannot discuss taste but guys, come on!!! Tell me, what was intriguing about this fiasco? Everything was completely unrealistic. If you considered this movie in any way “smart” or that it should get an Oscar, you have serious issues!!! I never usually write comments but this one really REALLY earned them! Please... Please, whatever you do, don't bother wasting time and money to see this... this cry out for psychological help for Hollywood people that have nothing to do with their time and subventions. Maria.
1/10
29.8.2002 - mehreea@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Simone was absolutly wonderfull, a great story about man that is crushed by Fame.
10/10
29.8.2002 - mandy_0800@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
That movie is way too long, theres nothing really going on. I even had problems watching till the end. You cant just put an hot girl in a movie and expect it to be good.
2/10
28.8.2002 - canardmou@ - age: 13-17
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The movie was great. Many message "under the table" for the media and the world of publicity. It really shows how people (the audience) can really be gullible sometimes about so many things. Overall, Al Pacino was great as always and Simone is so GORGEOUS!!!
9/10
28.8.2002 - heart2night@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
A great movie to watch at the end of the day. Funny yet subtle, and is very enjoyable..
8/10
28.8.2002 - emailgary@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I think that Simone is the best movie of the year... good script, excellent cast, Al Pacino is amazing, a whole new idea... it makes you laugh, cry, and wonder about the society in which we are living... full of implicit messages... 2 thumbs up.
9/10
27.8.2002 - zimania@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Fun... different...
9/10
27.8.2002 - mightymk3@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Original, entertaining. Al Pacino moulded himself into another character... again. It got a good concept, maybe not profound enough, but it's still OK. I have to mention that all the computer stuff wasnt really realistic... I never saw a hard disk who can be insert like a CD, and the virus disk was in a 512k disk... who was extinct from the market 10 years ago. I dont know how low is the budget, but they should have bought some cables to hang aroung the PCs, it would seems more "realistic". of course, those are details :)
7/10
27.8.2002 - c0nfuzi@ - age: 18-25
104 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Really enjoyed this movie. Very different and the ending was surprising.
8/10
27.8.2002 - cbroudy@ - age: 50+
25 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Overall an okay movie. The start is interesting but gets a little boring in the middle... pretty predictable but though it was an interesting topic!
7/10
27.8.2002 - chole@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It's hard to say whether I liked the movie or not. It had its fun and amusing rides but some parts just made me do the old "look at the watch" routine. GO see it, but dont give it thumbs up.
6/10
26.8.2002 - markhaulena@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
A revelation. While there has been a lot of bad reviews, this film, like the Truman Show by the same makers, charts the true zeitgeist of our age - celebrity and illusion run amok. I mean, do we not already worship the fake? Isn't it just the tiniest of changes if our celebrities become actual computer simulations instead of real people enmeshed in sims via green-screens and digital editing? Our Celebs/Simones are our deities, our Nietzche-esque super-people, and this film, in a weirdly lighthearted and funny way, is really a horror-show, if you really care to look past the simulation...
10/10
26.8.2002 - jonathan@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was kind of boring and weird, I guess it was OK.
5/10
26.8.2002 - pookikinz21@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was a light fun movie.
8/10
26.8.2002 - adthrawn@ - age: 18-25
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Very good very funny it's really a good movie!
9/10
25.8.2002 - bourdon@ - age: 13-17
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I really enjoy that movie, Pacino is that great. Mostly emotionnal, so sweet and relaxing, you got to see it. This virtual woman changes everybody's life. You'll love her too!
8/10
25.8.2002 - guay,monique@ - age: 36-49
601 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply