|
Showing all 40 reviews...
|
|
 |
Rachel Getting Married? Who Cares! This was the worst movie I've seen in a long time. The camera jerked around making me nauseated for the entire film. I nearly lost my dinner on the people in front of me. There were parts that could have been cut out or cut down in time. Some scenes went on awkwardly too long and were extremely boring. Certain characters were terribly developed leaving the viewer wondering if they forgot a scene. I nearly walked out many times. The only redeeming thing about this movie was Anne Hathaway's performance. She did well but it's still not worth watching this film. Watch clips of her performance on Youtube.
1/10
30.11.2008 -
lisa_p@ - age: 26-35
Awful movie. Just plain awful. The only reason why I stayed the whole way through is because I wanted to see if Rachel would stop being so mean and judgemental to Kym; she didn't.
1/10
28.11.2008 -
graveyard,cemetery,darkness@ - age: 13-17
Well developed characters who show themselves throughout the movie in a realistic subtle way. Shows characters as flawed people, who you can empathize with, even if not necessary able to identify directly with their situation. All of the main character actors give superb performances.
9/10
28.11.2008 -
jcamwell@ - age: 26-35
The camera jerked around constantly making me want to barf constantly. Kym (Anne Hathaway's character) had an awful, judgmental family that seemed to just want to get rid of her. If you want to watch a show about a drug addict with a horrible family that doesn't understand about drugs, watch Intervention. SERIOUSLY. Watch it. The only reason why I didn't give this movie a 0 is, A) Because this website only lets you rate it from 1-10 and, B)This was Anne Hathaway's most amazing acting ever. I've always loved her, but this was FANTASTIC. If you're a fan of her, watch this; because she did an amazing job at showing what a recovering addict is like.
1/10
23.11.2008 -
misanthropic,wanderer@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
Never before have I given a movie such a bad rating, but I am now! Anne Hathaway did an AMAZING job acting out as a recovering drug addict! So kudos to her! However, this whole movie had absolutely NOTHING interesting. The wedding took forEVER to finish. There was like, 20 full length wedding speeched that took half an hour and the wedding had loud music that went on for 10 minutes straight with nothing happening. None of the characters except Anne Hathaway had any development, especially Rachel's husband, Sydney. What the hell does she see in such a boring guy?!!! This movie SUCKED!!! But Anne Hathaway is sure to get nominated for some awards, and I hope she wins them all.
1/10
23.11.2008 -
sweetblood,diabetic@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
Anne Hathaway is terrific as Kym, a recovering drug addict who gets out of rehab to attend her sister's wedding. Rosemarie DeWitt (from tv's Mad Men) is also very good as the sister, Rachel, as is Debra Winger as their mother. The film is a co-mingling of joy and pain as Kym's return home sets off long-standing resentments. The wedding rehearsal, as well as the wedding and reception, is amazing in its being the most non-traditional wedding I've seen--totally eclectic, including the music. It was wonderful to watch--not just another cookie-cutter wedding/keeping up with the Jones's excess, but an exuberant down-home wedding. I think the hand-held camera work was meant to give the audience a feeling of participation; the audience becomes another guest at the wedding. The film was quite sad at times, especially Kym's struggle to forgive herself for past sins; her struggle to confront her sister and her mother--but ultimately it was hopeful because of her courage in facing her demons. A very powerful film.
9/10
22.11.2008 -
julieb43@ - age: 36-49
Good acting by Anne Hathaway and that was the only good thing. The jerky camera added nothing but a nausea. It was really like being at a bad wedding - where it went on for days. There was no point to the music, the speeches were bad even the song created by the groom had no melody nor lyrics that made sense. Much like the rest of the movie. Give a pass unless you want to see what it is like to have a self centered drug addict living in your family. Rt and d.
2/10
22.11.2008 -
the,deanes@ - age: 50+
I left the theatre feeling physically ill from the shakey camera to the constant screeching violin. The worst movie I have ever seen. The story line could have been good if a person wasn't constantly assulted by the shakey picture and horrible noise.
1/10
22.11.2008 -
grammaalligator@ - age: 50+
I had no idea what this film was about so I did not have any expectations. Anne Hathaway does a great job portraying a recovering addict. But thats about it. I felt like this was a sequel and no one told me about part 1. Felt like we came into everything and nothing was explained. Why was the wedding indian themed? What was with the extensive music enterage? Why the long reception? Why Why Why is all we kept asking! Not recommending to anyone. Sorry.
4/10
17.11.2008 -
skewatts@ - age: 26-35
Great acting and interesting family history. But that jerky camera doesn't give the feel of a documentary, but a home movie. And who besides your close ones really wants to see a home movie? And geez, that music! It's like everybody was practising out of key. Just when I thought it couldn't get any more annoying, out comes a guy blowing into a whistle while dancing wildly to the beat of a drum. Give this one a miss.
3/10
15.11.2008 -
s_bleau@ - age: 36-49
Amazing movie... Anne Hathaway is great! I loved it!
10/10
11.11.2008 -
mecirresistible@ - age: 18-25
Not terrible but could have been much better. Demme forgoes subtlety to hammer home ever possible point to reveal how incredibly dysfunctional this family is. He seems to revel in giving the viewer scenes that give us some hope for the family only to then finish the scene off with some deception or terrible heartbreak everytime. Demme chooses to crank up the melodrama but forgoes genuine character authenticity in the process. It leaves the viewer feeling like a distant observer of a train wreck. Interesting piece though not so entertaining.
6/10
11.11.2008 -
heron2004@ - age: 36-49
Phoney characters, boring boring boring speeches! The setting was so contrived and pretentious with its obnoxious music and one-dimensional cast of U. N. type characters. I wanted to run away from this drawn-out party and I just didn't care about any of the people who were there. The camera work made me sick.
4/10
9.11.2008 -
cathxx31@
'Disfunction' is given entirely new meaning in this film! Anne Hathaway is outstanding as the self focused recovering addict, Kym... Anne's facial expressions and body language poignantly convey her desperate longing for her mother's affection and her sister's acceptance... as she quietly searches for self forgiveness and to let go of the tragic consequence of a responsibility given her by this same mother. I found the 'jerky' camera work not only distracting but serving no purpose to the movie's message... which I still ponder considering hope was, and will remain elusive... Anne Hathaway's performance notwithstanding, this movie was a 'downer'.
6/10
8.11.2008 -
tj,shermann@ - age: 50+
This movie is 30 minutes too long, and the half-hour is as torturous and boring as a real-life distant cousin's wedding: no action, just a feeling of being crammed with a whole bunch of strangers waiting for something to happen, but to no avail. On the plus side, at least we know Anne Hathaway can actually act in a serious role, but that's certainly not enough to justify the agonizing plot and the price of the tickets. If you must see it, wait for the video.
5/10
8.11.2008 -
triana,info@ - age: 26-35
Fabulous. Discovery of the year: Mather Zickel. Anne Hathaway is fantastic. The whole cast was great, and Debra Winger is back! Please say she's back.
10/10
6.11.2008 -
jcat197@ - age: 26-35
Another long-waited and great original film. It's a beautiful, emotional and real drama, just like the ordinary life itself. It moves you. Highly recommended for people who fights, cries, hates, forgives, laughs and loves!
10/10
6.11.2008 -
kev3110@ - age: 18-25
Uneven -- Anne Hathaway had excellent moments as the tragic addict in recovery bearing the projections of a dysfunctional family system. The intense conflict with her sister and mother is well done; Debra Winger is explosive as the mother in denial forced to confront her negligence. The wedding itself was fairly irksome, so much multi-culturalism that it brimmed with saccarine bonhommie. The hand-held camera was a constant distraction. Hathaway will be on the list for Best Actress, as she should be. Her startling performance significantly broadens her screen persona.
7/10
5.11.2008 -
iispiral@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
What a downer! My two friends went to sleep. Why do we need a movie about another dysfunctional American family? And what was it with the violins? Great disappointment.
3/10
2.11.2008 -
pporter@ - age: 50+
It's like going to a wedding where you don't really know anyone and you sit next to a drunk relative who tells you about the skeletons in the family's closet. A few good laughs and certainly some sad, poignant moments. A good video movie. I'd recommend Victoria Christina over this one.
6/10
2.11.2008 -
karennewman@ - age: 36-49
Actually this is a great film, but it turned out to be my worst movie going experience. Don't go if you are at all susceptible to motion sickness, or at least go armed with Gravol. I was not alone to feel nauseous because the POV camera swung, sometimes violently, in all directions with hardly a steady shot in the whole film.
1/10
1.11.2008 -
lucasj@ - age: 50+
Great movie! Well written and truthful! I really enjoyed it. Jen.
10/10
31.10.2008 -
toronto78@ - age: 26-35
To be perfectly honest, I'm somewhat disappointed. Nothing's wrong with Demme's movie, but nothing steps out either, despite a convincing performance from Hathaway and the rest of the cast. The wedding reception scene is way too long...
7/10
31.10.2008 -
ypratte@ - age: 36-49
This is such an amazing movie, because it looks what a real person and their family struggles with. Anne Hathaway was phenomenal!
10/10
31.10.2008 -
natalieshay@ - age: 26-35
I have to admit, I was not sure about this movie until about a half hour in. The shaky camera movements were distracting at first, but once you get used to that, it does provide a somewhat more intimate view into the characters. The performances were outstanding - especially Rosemarie DeWitt (who plays Rachel), Anne Hathaway and, of course, Debra Winger. This movie put my heart through the rinse cycle - I was surprised to find myself choking back tears and wanting to hug every member of the cast. A truly beautiful and moving experience.
8/10
30.10.2008 -
annacz11@ - age: 26-35
If you like to watch women yelling and screaming and basically acting like your crazy ex girlfriend on steroids then watch this movie. The scenes are drawn out and boring and the only coll part is when someone sings Neil Young. Man that guys got some great lyrics!
3/10
29.10.2008 -
mussells@ - age: 36-49
I loved this movie! The filming style made me feel as if I were a guest at the wedding. I truly hope that the Academy remembers Anne Hathaway's performance when it's time for the Oscar nominations. My only critique: who decided to call this a comedy?
8/10
28.10.2008 -
lesliejune@ - age: 26-35
Anne Hathaway's performance was very good, but, it was like being at a real wedding for someone you don't really like that much. It was tedious and the violin music was irritating. Everyone was so angry and bitter. I would hate this group of people to be my family. I thought this was going to be a comedy and there was not even a chuckle in it. Rachel was horrible to her sister. This is a boring miss.
2/10
27.10.2008 -
lindabiln@ - age: 50+
Honest performances by the entire cast. Felt like part of the family. Loved the music and the story.
8/10
25.10.2008 -
ladydavidson81@ - age: 26-35
The acting is excellent. But you should only watch this if you like seeing dysfunctional WASPs having nervous breakdowns. Don't need to pay $13 for this, just go to any Thanksgiving dinner in suburbia.
6/10
25.10.2008 -
rrocha,movie@ - age: 26-35
Anne Hathaway is fabulous as is the rest of the cast. Other than this new jerky style of filming that seems to be so popular and really distracts me, I really enjoyed the movie.
8/10
24.10.2008 -
alicestarr@ - age: 50+
Although the scenes Anne Hathaway were in, were really good, the movie was way too long and boring. The actors appeared to be whining a lot and I felt like none of them were real. There were scenes that were so long I wanted to leave the theatre. It was nice to see Anne Hathaway play a different kind of role, but I would love to see her in something better next time. Oh, and the constant violin playing in the background annoyed me so much by the end that I longed for some peace and quiet.
6/10
24.10.2008 -
charmedsister@ - age: 26-35
| 
