|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 167)
|
|
 |
Great sequel to the first one. A lot of action and creepy. Great horror. Will watch again.
7/10
30.6.2008 -
casserly5@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Wow, I was expecting way more. Based on the solid performance of the first - this was a money grab in my opinion. If it wasn't the sequel of a really good zombie movie I might have scored it higher. Great job on the part of the make-up department.
5/10
17.4.2008 -
xtrastuf@ - age: 36-49
Not as good as the fist one but still has its moments.
7/10
24.2.2008 -
michaylo@ - age: 13-17
DVD: "28 Weeks Later"
The music in that movie was scary and very different from other horror movie there were some deep sound. Wihtout music the movie would be very boring because there are not alot of dialogs. There was enough music to keep the suspence. Like sometime in the movie, music started played I took there going to had a startl like in each horror movie when the music start to play then at the second I took there noting will appen... Suprise! The music was enough long to make everyone forgoot about the start. The director, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo did a realy good job directing that movie. I realy liked this movie L-G. 2007.
8/10
21.12.2007 -
lion_king42@ - age: 13-17
I find the film 28 weeks later was an excellent tale because it a lot of action and there were surprising moments and the story also was awesome because is not the same thing of zombie, the infected people run very very fast and the zombie is slow. The music theme is amazing, it was in the context of the history and made us feel an emotion which one shall not feel if it would not be. I have especially like the scene where the soldiers exterminate infected people and the music plat at the same time. [...]
8/10
13.12.2007 -
pkarim@ - age: 13-17
This wasn't very good, it was boring and it dragged throughout the film. The first movie was way better, so don't go in with high expectations.
4/10
24.11.2007 -
mkittey29@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
It was absolutely brilliant! I loved it and would see it over and over again. There may have been more gore this time (excellent!) but what did it for me was the reality that it could really happen.
10/10
24.10.2007 -
maria_maria_emm@ - age: 26-35
DVD: "28 Weeks Later - 28 Semaines Plus Tard (Widescreen, Biling.)"
The best part of the movie is the beginning, its is much like the fist movie, but the rest of the movie wasn't that great, but worth watching.
6/10
22.10.2007 -
haggard_drummer_boy@ - age: 13-17
The opening scene was fabulous, the rest of the movie was very disappointing. I loved the first one & was very anxious to see the sequel. It opened with a bang & then turned terribly boring. It is nothing compared to the first, but is worth watching for the intense opening. You can leave after that :)
6/10
19.10.2007 -
pendyn@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
This was such a sad scuse for a horror flick. I was very much looking forward to this film, having enjoyed the first film tremendously. What shock and disappointment to realize that this film was put together by a bunch of hacks with no talent and no writing skill among them. Every event is brought about by "convenient" acts of stupidity on the part of perfectly unlikable characters."ooo, let's sneak out of a secure zone and go explore a zombie infested city just for fun!", and of course, this "secure" city has guards who appear unable to see anything further than their belt buckles. Better yet, let's bring a killer zombie into our safe city, and leave it totally unattended, and give free rein to a glorified janitor so he can wreck havock and mayhem. Sorry, this film is so burdened with plot holes and improbabilities that it is patently unwatchable. Add to that a cameraman who appears to be in the midst of an acute epileptic seizure for the entire duration of filming, and you have a recipe for one of the worst films of the year. And I am a horror fan... and I love bad movies. But I have my limits!
2/10
9.10.2007 -
cap_canuk@ - age: 36-49
DVD: "28 Weeks Later"
There was a weak plot, I think that the movie could an hour shorter if want a weak movie this movie is for you.
5/10
21.9.2007 -
lawl_2007@ - age: 13-17
Compelling script. The story line is still makes sense for a sci fi flick. The action is abundant and so are the thrills and chills. The ending leaves place for a sequel, the acting is up to par, the cinematography is really good... I mean is there any reason you wouldn't watch this flick? Ohh well if you aren't into zombie movies...
7/10
11.9.2007 -
sacoca_@ - age: 26-35
| 
