|
Showing all 15 reviews...
|
|
 |
I would pay 20$ NOT to see the movie. More than 2 hours of my life I'm never going to get back. They've just invented a new form of torture.
1/10
16.3.2003 -
drzobar_ashad@ - age: 26-35
Haha, I remember when I saw this movie in theater in 99 when I was in high school. It was so tedious, ridiculous and stupid that I laughed out LOUD in the middle of the presentation; people seemed to understand me. I still can't believe I skipped a class for that movie, ended up failing in that discipline.
3/10
26.12.2002 -
pasassezca@ - age: 18-25
Not very entertaining, and very little plot. What plot there is, is certainly unbelievable.
5/10
20.11.2002 -
patnkat@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
DANGEROUSLY BORING!! Do not drive or operate heavy machinery after seeing this film. May cause severe and recurring drowsiness. Contact your physician if you notice anyone drop dead on the livingroom floor!
1/10
6.8.2001 -
pyrhuss@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
This was definitely, without a doubt, the worst movie I have seen this year. It isn't worth seeing for free on the rainiest of days.
1/10
21.4.2000 -
janina@ - age: 26-35
Being a Harrison Ford fan, I was greatly disapointed by this movie. It was long, boring and seemed to go nowhere. I mean two and half hours about someone obsessed with their dead cheating wife. Give me a break. Througout the whole movie I waited and hoped that something exciting would happen and nothing. I would not even recommend renting this..
1/10
2.11.1999 -
solid777@ - age: 26-35
I decided to go see RANDOM HEARTS tonight... I should have stayed home and watched TV instead. It *looked* like it could have had an intriguing plot twist and interesting storyline. Turns out I was fooled by the advertising campaigns. Shame on me. Save your money. Nothing keeping you glued to your seat in this one.
2/10
26.10.1999 -
aragona@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Random excitement - random boredom + great 30-minute plot - excruciating 130-minute result __________________ = RANDOM HEARTS. Let me summarise this picture for you: Harrison Ford loses his wife in a plane crash. Kristin Scott Thomas loses her husband in the same plane crash. He's a cop. She's a congresswoman. He investigates the deaths and finds out that his wife was having an affair with the congresswoman's husband. This obviously means that Harrison and Kristin have to get together as well, either for revenge, to cathartically dispel their grief, or just because they are 2 good looking middle aged people who want to prove that they can still be romantic on the widescreen. Let me just say that the end result is extremely disappointing for 3 reasons. First, it takes a few lines to explain what the movie is about, but the movie is longer than 2 hours. Second, it would take a lot more than 2 hours to convince me that they belonged together, but I wouldn't have been interested to see it go longer than an hour altogether. And finally, they threw in some uninteresting subplots into the mix in order to drag out the agony of sitting through the whole mess. Women may or may not enjoy Harrison and his earring in this movieĀ
men will enjoy no part of this movie.
5/10
25.10.1999 -
xexplicitx@ - age: 18-25
One word.... boring. Ok, 2 words.... VERY BORING!!
1/10
21.10.1999 -
errol@
| | | | |
"Random Events" would have been a more appropriate title for this movie because the story has zero continuity. Not only does the plot go nowhere, but it gets there at a lethargic chick-flick pace (sorry ladies). Even the little subplot is completely useless and only results in a 20-second payoff. Trust me, after the cabin lovescene, it all goes downhill and you'll be praying for the closing credits... So let's add up the score: one point for Ford's usual decent acting job, half a point for Thomas' passable rendition of a Hillary Clinton wannabe, and half a point for the theatre's nachos, which were the best part of this film experience!
2/10
18.10.1999 -
rudedude@ - age: 26-35
What can I say... the story line was on the right track but the movie it self just didn't keep the interest long enough to enjoy this movie... Harisson Ford, altough still got the looks, is getting to old to do romantic movies. I was not too impresed with this movie and neither where the 7 people that walked out...
3/10
15.10.1999 -
sbrinckhaus@ - age: 26-35
Absolute waste of time and money folks. Learn from my mistake. It is the worst performance ever by Mr. Ford, who usually draws me in. I could go on and on about how bad this one really is, but it is not worth my time. At your peril folks.
1/10
15.10.1999 -
pkg@
What a movie. It's not exactly what I had expected. If you have a painful infidelity in your marriage, maybe this movie is for you. Other |
