|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 69)
|
|
 |
Boring and unscary. Simple story that seems to go on forever. Worse than The Grudge 2. Pales in comparison to Ringu or The Ring. By the way, who uses 35 mm or Polaroid cameras anymore?
4/10
6.5.2008 -
parker2@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
The usual Hollywood drivel - someone already did it and better! The original Thai version was far superior - more suspenseful and creepier all around.
3/10
24.4.2008 -
quillsinc@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
It was a good movie to me and I actually got scared...
9/10
18.4.2008 -
trinhhtran06@ - age: 13-17
This is a good movie for those who have an interest in paranormal energy or spiritography (electronic spirit communication) I wouldn't recommend anyone dabbling in the paranormal but I would certainly take this movie very seriously.
8/10
15.4.2008 -
tmethot@ - age: 36-49
This movie wasn't too bad, but it could have been better. Instead of the random plot, there should have been more "make you jump" scenes. Go see it if you have some spare time.
6/10
11.4.2008 -
stoned_peter@ - age: 18-25
This movie sucks, not scary at all and very predictable. Would discourage any one from watching this crap. Do waste your time and money.
1/10
8.4.2008 -
sam_007_84@ - age: 18-25
Got exactly what I expected a few laughs, impressive twist near the end caught me off guard.
6/10
6.4.2008 -
threexring@ - age: 13-17
Honestly, don't even bother seeing this remake, stick with the original asian movies, they're always better. Hollywood is just being greedy and stealing all their classic horror films... The original Shutter is so much better and I just don't see why they can't show it in theaters with subtitles or something.
1/10
6.4.2008 -
mimijg@ - age: 18-25
Not terrible, however, not great. A little jumpy at times but not worth seeing again.
4/10
5.4.2008 -
hoover777@ - age: 13-17
It was really good, scary at times and really entertaining, just the ending let me down.
7/10
2.4.2008 -
worsley@ - age: 13-17
I went to see Shutter with my mom on Tuesday pretty scary movie but also good parts only a few disturbing parts but over all really good movie lol if you have a photographic memory like me think b4 you watch Shutter because you will have the parts in your head for a while lol.
8/10
2.4.2008 -
laces-in@ - age: 1-12
Just another proof that American cinema is completely out of breath and they find nothing better to do than rehashing foreign hit flicks (in this case from Thailand) Not a bad movie in itself, but still nothing more than a copy... along with The Ring, The Grudge, The Departed... Go see the original!
5/10
1.4.2008 -
asiancinema@ - age: 18-25
It was pretty scary but in the end it kinda didnt make sence but was good:P ~! Chelseyy! ~
7/10
31.3.2008 -
seajay2004@ - age: 13-17
I enjoyed this movie, although it wasn't scary to me I still thought it had a good plot line.
7/10
30.3.2008 -
beatenandblindfoled@ - age: 13-17
It was pretty good. The acting was not bad, it was a bit intense in some parts. Definitely a must see if you like scary movies!
10/10
30.3.2008 -
roxybunnie@ - age: 18-25
Scarey!! Definitely worth seeing. Not at all a waste of money! I don't know what these people are talking about! Great movie.
10/10
30.3.2008 -
temple_101@ - age: 18-25
Why all the negative ratings? Did you simply not get the movie? Or were you a 15 year old kid too busy making out to even try to understand it! Finally a movie that I didn't figure out half way through the movie, the clues were very smartly spread all through it and there were even stuff we understood on our way back in the subway! If you were a fan of the ring and sick of same old horror movies you will definitely enjoy this one!
9/10
30.3.2008 -
l_saidi2@ - age: 18-25
It's a good movie and is scary went to see it with friends it is worth every penny you spend.
9/10
30.3.2008 -
matt_heibein@ - age: 13-17
The most gayest movie ever I felt like a worm in a beehive.
1/10
29.3.2008 -
danielleewing22@ - age: 50+
I thought this was the stupdiest movie I have seen in a long time if I could have I would have asked for my money back!!!
1/10
29.3.2008 -
scleary09@ - age: 36-49
If you like to get the chills go and watch it. I liked it very much. It was as good as "Ring" and "The Grudge"
8/10
29.3.2008 -
monika,hans@ - age: 26-35
Wow I'm actually speachless I have seen better acting on Scoobie Doo! Back to the Creek with you buddy.
1/10
29.3.2008 -
kmacneil72@
Worst movie I have ever seen not scary at all and the acting sucked.
1/10
28.3.2008 -
ryan_rob44@ - age: 13-17
Normally I refuse to see horror films, but, I insisted to see it this time and it was worth it.
7/10
28.3.2008 -
sizbi21@ - age: 26-35
As far as horror movies go, the predictable blonde actress etc. etc... I was surprised that it was decent. The first ten minutes I felt that I chose the wrong movie but the movie is decent, acting for the most part is acceptable and the general theme was good. Could have been better as it seemed to run on but the ending was twisted in a way that I enjoyed. It didn't end the traditional, escaped victims limping off into the distance type ending. All in all a decent movie worth seeing.
7/10
28.3.2008 -
natti_110@ - age: 13-17
Seeing Shutter was a complete waste of time. The acting was awful, the script was very poorly written and didn't seem natural, nobody in the theatre was paying attention to the movie. Probably one of the worst flicks I've seen at the theatre.
1/10
27.3.2008 -
cheneylambert@ - age: 18-25
The story is so crazy, it's not worth wasting 90 mins to find out what it all means. Thank God that the acting is okay, otherwise I would rate this a 1 or 2...
4/10
27.3.2008 -
stephenhamel@ - age: 36-49
Who ever came up with the script need to signed over his check to the creator of 'THE GRUDGE'. Same idea was used, they could at at least change the location of the movie but they couldn't even do that! Do avoid at all cost.
3/10
26.3.2008 -
sentenza99@ - age: 26-35
| 
