|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 73)
|
|
 |
I don't understand why women hate Megan fox just because she is super hot. I mean seriously if you get rid of all the reviews based solely on womens hate for her good looks, this movie would be rated much better. Lol I mean this movie wasnt the worst movie ever, pretty sure that belongs to gigli.
7/10
8.12.2009 -
go_vikings_84@ - age: 18-25
All what I can say is that it's a total waste of money if you go watch it in the movies!! Story had no sense.
4/10
29.11.2009 -
nisanthant@ - age: 18-25
This will be one of those films where you are always hoping for it to become more than it does. It is okay, but it just goes from beginning to end lacking. If you have seen the preview, you've probably seen the best parts of the film.
5/10
15.10.2009 -
ashakydd@ - age: 26-35
From the beginning to the end the movie is terrible!!
1/10
13.10.2009 -
chenel,georget@ - age: 18-25
This sucks! Dont watch it, its so stupid! It makes no sense at all!
1/10
13.10.2009 -
eyusseem@ - age: 13-17
This is not a good movie for Megan Fox to play in. If the main actress wasnt Megan then the movie would have been way better!! She needs to play in porn movies where it suits her. They need a girl who is not soo good looking. She is way too good looking for this movie. She still looks amazing in this movie though. Was very entertaining.
6/10
12.10.2009 -
cidaolindao@ - age: 13-17
Uhhh... not as good as we thought is was gunna be...
6/10
12.10.2009 -
calliebennett7@ - age: 13-17
Hot movie sexy people!! We went in not expecting much but were suprised it was pretty good and definitely worth seeing on a rainy day! : )
7/10
11.10.2009 -
bouskilab@ - age: 18-25
I thought it was good, Yes a bit cheesy at times but you have to expect it. Overall it was very good, and I'm a girl who likes Megan Fox, and she just fits this role very well. Her acting isn't the best, but for her role it works.
8/10
11.10.2009 -
alisenok3@ - age: 18-25
Wow I'll never look at Megan fox the same way ever again, this movie was terrible!!
4/10
9.10.2009 -
kaitlynhibbitt@ - age: 18-25
It was the best movie I ever saw in my life. I found it very interesting, expecially finding out who the killer was :P:)
10/10
9.10.2009 -
bradleymartin_9@ - age: 13-17
It was amazing! Though be warned you have to really like Scary movies to like this one. But if you do, this movie has a lot more story to it than most would think! Also It is Exteamly Funny at some parts! (3 Its my new Favorite.
9/10
4.10.2009 -
oriel-griff@ - age: 13-17
It was funny, just like it was supposed to be. Amanda, Adam, and Ms Fox were amazing actors in it. Great job Diablo!
10/10
4.10.2009 -
jax_121@ - age: 18-25
Worst movie I've ever seen... I predicted every scene. Trust me it's wasted money.
1/10
3.10.2009 -
sweet_as_hell2@ - age: 18-25
This wasn't the worst horror movie i've see but it was definitely one of them.
3/10
3.10.2009 -
daren95@ - age: 13-17
This was a great movie. Megan Fox was great, she played her part well. The spooky parts were the best. I would definitely see it again!!!
10/10
3.10.2009 -
dianezorn@ - age: 13-17
She's hot and thats the main reason for the guys is to see her goodies. For me it was alright and some parts I found funny because they were just so ridiculous, but other parts were actually pretty good acting. Not bad. Something to do and see on a rainy day or when your bored.
7/10
3.10.2009 -
hochheimer29@ - age: 13-17
This movie was very much confusing I was asking myself the whole movie what is going on and why did they write the movie like this. The ending was great (i think anywyay) the begining of the movie was alright and the middle was alright. I felt they rushed the story line a lot like if your in that much of a hurry to rush the story write a sequal. Another thing how did they manage to make the geek look hottier then Megan Fox lol if u wanna watch a movie maybe see something else but I saw it with my cuzin and we were laughing the whole time intill the ending came then someone decided to actually do thier job and write a good movie be cause I loved the ending so if your bored go see it or if u wanna a movie to laugh at see it :)
6/10
2.10.2009 -
casuperfital@ - age: 13-17
I thought it a good film. It had all the creepy aspects of a horror film, and as well as scary aspects. The idea was original, Megan looked fine, Amanda played a good nerd, the sex puns were kind stupid but you had a good laugh, all in all, a good movie. I wouldn't see it over and over again. But it was good. I'll wait till it's out on DVD.
7/10
2.10.2009 -
david_sm@ - age: 18-25
It was an alright movie a bit scary and not bad acting I say go see it.
7/10
2.10.2009 -
dane_pirro@ - age: 13-17
I thought it was alright but it could have been better. It was a little scatered and kinda weird. The acting was good but I think they glorified megans beauty a little to much... Like why cant she be ugly in a movie why does she have to look great... she's suposed to be a man eater girl not hotness.
6/10
1.10.2009 -
x,asia,rheanne,x@ - age: 18-25
I loved it. It was just what it was supposed to be, a silly scary movie. Megan Fox did better than I ever thought she would, which isn't saying much...
8/10
1.10.2009 -
damnit_woman@ - age: 26-35
I don't know why some people are giving this movie a bad review? It was clever, looked good, original idea, and had a good soundtrack. After seeing this film my friend and I said that we felt it would go over allot of peoples heads. Sure enough...
9/10
1.10.2009 -
spyder130@ - age: 26-35
Horrible. I couldn't get through the first 40 minutes of it.
4/10
30.9.2009 -
exquizit,bebe@ - age: 13-17
The movie was really lame... like the acting was good and all... but some parts were just LAME! oh and you're the type of person that loves to see to girls making out... this is the movie for you. But if not, don't waste your time and money on it. The only good thing was the ending but still lame.. :)
5/10
29.9.2009 -
spiceupurlife_sapphire@ - age: 18-25
Diablo cody scores a twisted and wicked horror picture. I must be the only 1 who enjoyed this movie. Fox & Seyfried chemistry worked awesome in their best performances. ******** 8 oh! Yeah there's at least 8 characters from Juno! Do I get xlarge devil kettle tshirt. Smiles 2ice.
8/10
29.9.2009 -
cdsky@ - age: 36-49
Im am shocked on how many of you rated this as if it was an academy nominated film! What did you expect from a teen vampire horror flick starring Megan Fox! It was fantastic for what it was, Megan looks Fab as usual and the plot is alright! It was exactly what I expected with a little humor and cheep fright, A must see!
7/10
29.9.2009 -
juzzzj@ - age: 26-35
This movie is soo good, I'm going to see it again tonight... hehehe, thats how good it is... :D
8/10
28.9.2009 -
xo,aimze@ - age: 18-25
It sucked big time. Worst movie of the year. Megan can't act. She should become a human mannequin because she looks alright and can't act one bit.
1/10
28.9.2009 -
fme@ - age: 1-12
Best part of the movie - the previews Worst part of the movie - you will never get that 1 hour and 42 minutes of your life back.
1/10
28.9.2009 -
zinzin77@ - age: 18-25
Would not recommend this movie to anybody. Very very bad.
1/10
28.9.2009 -
minorthreat-87@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I find the comments on this film puzzling. This was not a great film, but certainly no worse than most of the crap that hits the cinema. The writing was often clever and the acting was good. It was not particularly frightening, but it did have some serious moments of "creep". Megan Fox was fine - she is not a great actress, but she was competent for what this role required, which did involve a bit more than just looking good. Amanda Seyfried stole the show, however. What is unfortunate is that the movie could have been far better. I noticed that some of the better-known lines from the trailers were missing - eg."No, I'm killing boys" and "I will finish you" "Um - you can't even finish gym class". Makes you wonder what was edited out and if it would have made a difference. The real and central story here, which was generally not as developed or as nuanced as it needed to be, was the relationship between the two girls. The lesbian scene in the film feels awkward and somewhat contrived, even though it probably gets to the heart of some of the events in the film. Again, it makes me wonder about the editing. And there is a curious subplot in the film that may tie into the relationship of the two girls that is never really developed - not to give anything away, but what really causes the fire at the club? One plus: the ending of the movie was satisfying.
6/10
27.9.2009 -
narine@ - age: 36-49
This movie sucked, the only good thing was Megan fox.
3/10
27.9.2009 -
xdsourkeys@ - age: 13-17
Terrible. Waste of time money and brain cells trying to understand it.
1/10
27.9.2009 -
mini_keswani78@ - age: 18-25
Loved it a lot. Don't know why the other did not...
10/10
27.9.2009 -
versavillage@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
At the beginning the movie was okay but had a lot of random and unrealistic parts that basically made you think "what the heck.. ? ". I think that this movie had a good plot line but seemed to be rushed together with random stuff at the end. And near the point when Needy dumps her boyfriend because she realizes it's too dangerous, it went really bad and didn't get better. And the ending fight scene at the pool was HORRIBLY ended. It couldve been way better.
3/10
26.9.2009 -
midnight-pyro@ - age: 13-17
The only good thing about this movie was that I was with a group of friends who, like me, spent the entire movie trying to figure out jobs for Megan Fox since she cannot act. Horrible. Movie. Don't. Even. Rent. This.
2/10
26.9.2009 -
xox_stephiee_xox@ - age: 18-25
I was not expecting much from this movie so I was very surprised at how good it was. This is not the sort of typical teen slasher movie that the theatres are often full of. There is a sophisticated plot and fully developed characters (not the sort of one- dimensional characters you might expect)
8/10
26.9.2009 -
wallacefield@ - age: 36-49
This movie was supposed to be scary (I think...), but it wasn't at all. It was also exceedingly stupid. Having said that, I still thoroughly enjoyed it. I actually found it hilarious, I was laughing pretty much the entire time. I loved Adam Brody in it too, and Amanda Seyfreid was also pretty good. Megan Fox was, well... Megan Fox. Go see it if you enjoy laughing at scary movies. Or maybe wait for it to come out on DVD.
7/10
26.9.2009 -
kristin--x0@ - age: 13-17
This was a fun movie to watch. It was very relaxing and I liked it!
7/10
26.9.2009 -
star_berry@ - age: 18-25
It was a good film to watch, No idea why folks didn't rate the film well, Go and see it.
7/10
26.9.2009 -
elhz2307@ - age: 36-49
I dont know why people dont like this one... maybe your expectation were too high... I liked it made me laugh and scream.
8/10
25.9.2009 -
syrian_babe14@
It's clear going in that this is a trashy movie of only modest worth, but I was truly surprised to see that it was interesting, well cast, and visually entertaining. Unlike many horror movies, this is surprisingly scary. And has actual plot and characters. I had small expectations, but it was much better than I thought. Accept it for what it is.
7/10
25.9.2009 -
walter2@ - age: 50+
I am not sure why people are giving this movie such bad reviews. Just like other creature/alien/weird horror movies, the dialog is funny, the plot simple and shallow. However, a lot of it is done with tongue in cheek. It does not take itself too seriously and is really funny at parts. If you go to see it with that in mind you will enjoy it.
7/10
25.9.2009 -
nimrodlevy@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
I hope this puts Fox off the silver screen and onto Victoria Secret ads where she belongs. No good special effects to carry her in this one.
1/10
25.9.2009 -
michjulien@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Being a fan of horror films this wasn't much of a horror but it was still a good movie, worth seeing.
7/10
24.9.2009 -
jinxo999@ - age: 13-17
The lingo was horrible, had the most awkward sex scene and was just all around bad movie.
2/10
23.9.2009 -
wrferagen@ - age: 18-25
It was the worst movie I've seen in my entire life. Wow! I'm just wondering if it's a joke...
1/10
23.9.2009 -
nadine_al-yafie@ - age: 13-17
Wow so my boyfriend and I went to see this because I didn't want to drag him to another chick flick... and it was horrible, after the movie my boyfriend told me that he would have rather watched 10 chick flicks than have to sit through this crap, lost all respect for Megan fox, I cannot believe that she would choose such a bad movie to do. DO NOT SEE THIS WASTE OF MONEY!
1/10
22.9.2009 -
sexy_girl21@ - age: 18-25
A would-be scary movie about a demoniac transference that creates a certain confusion...
6/10
22.9.2009 -
serge_nina@ - age: 50+
| | | | |
| 
