Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Ultraviolet
 
windowtop
windowtop
136 user reviews

4.7/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
9
2
5.5
12
4.3
40
4.5
33
6.2
8
10
1
4.8
96
Women:
Votes:
6.5
2
6
9
2.4
15
4.1
7
6.3
3
-
0
4.2
36
Total:
Votes:
7.8
5
5.7
21
3.8
57
4.4
40
6.3
11
10
1
4.7
136
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 136)

I think that is the best movie I ever saw.
10/10
3.3.2008 - smilr_big_yaya@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Neat concept with only a OK follow thru. Lots of stunning effects.
6/10
23.4.2007 - dtmoores@ - age: 36-49
64 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought this actress was smokin hott but her acting was horrible as well the movie was the same dont waste your money.
2/10
21.1.2007 - sunmagicman@ - age: 26-35
19 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Story was good, however written a little weak, the action was pretty good with the exception of the kills being pretty weak, some of the aspects and set design were pretty cool, but at times it often looked a little to video gamish.
6/10
23.8.2006 - cfh_trendkill@ - age: 18-25
491 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie is a mess. The story is weak and the acting is bad. Ultravoliet deserves a lower Mark but there are flashes of brilliance sprinkled throughout. A motorcycle chase up the side of a building was unique and an outfit that changes depending on the hero's surrounding is a nice touch. There are several scenes that are original. However, in most cases the special effects required to pull off these unique ideas, such as the bike chase, are very poor. Had the movie been placed in the hands of a capable director it may have been an above average sci-fi actioner. As it stands this movie is guilty of having all style and no substance. It probably would have worked better as an animated film.
4/10
3.7.2006 - i-left-my-brain@ - age: 26-35
25 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This deserves alot lower but the fire sword fight at the end was the the only good part of this film so it brings it up quite a bit.
5/10
30.6.2006 - rottenskater@ - age: 13-17
50 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
An unbelievably bad movie, I wish I could get my 2 hours of life back. Please Please don't waste your time with this movie. There is no plot, no character development and hopefully no ultraviolet 2.
1/10
29.6.2006 - lee_tufford@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
People expect to much today but they dont know what they want in fact. This movie rocked, was great with great special effects, and I found it to be far better then Aeon Flux. Took a chance with all the bad reviews to buy the dvd without having seen the movie it was just great felt like the female version of Blade. Milla rocks.
10/10
28.6.2006 - wtainsider@ - age: 26-35
68 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
BAD MOVIE. No plot, no character development, bad choreography ( for those who said it was the strong point of the picture, watch "Equilibrium")character behavior is inconsistent through the movie, the list goes on...
1/10
16.5.2006 - masternavigator@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
WOW. Milla is Sooo PERFECT. Cool special effects and ground breaking choreography...
10/10
2.5.2006 - ethan@ - age: 26-35
16 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Thanks to Cinema clock who provided me with tickets to see this for free. Having read the reviews, I went not expecting much and therefore must have enjoyed it more. Milla is still hot! The movie seemed to be a lot of breaking into and out of a bunch of heavily secured buildings.
7/10
23.4.2006 - cliffa@ - age: 36-49
213 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I have a love/hate relationship with this movie. I walked in expecting a brainless, stylized action fest. And for the first 30 mins, that's what I got. Then the writer decided that he needed to explain stuff and the rest of the movie was full of uneeded drivel. Basically, watch it till the long string of action ends. Then walk out cause the rest isnt worth it.
6/10
18.4.2006 - s_glasgow99@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This movie sucks u should rather watch pokemon the movie then that piece of crap. Bad story line. Almost like underland except 10 times worse.
4/10
14.4.2006 - mix_boy1@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
All flash, no substance. Pretty much an hour and half music video, flimsy plot with gaping holes and no character development. Need to be in the right frame of mind to see this one, and only expect fights and special effects.
4/10
12.4.2006 - ddarling@ - age: 26-35
46 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought the movie was good. I enjoy vampire movies especially when they have a twist and thought this movie had a good story behind it to tell. Not everyone wil enjoy this flick but for the magority I think it is a well shot film.
7/10
3.4.2006 - doin2@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
VERY BAD. It has action in it but the action is bad too. It just doesn't have any meanings.
3/10
3.4.2006 - siavash_rainbow@ - age: 13-17
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
No consistentplot to the movie, pointless, and not very effective violence.
1/10
1.4.2006 - sweetestchick17@ - age: 13-17
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
No story at all, but Mila is hot!!!
6/10
1.4.2006 - patrick,lei565@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
This movie is the ALL TIME WORSE movie I have ever seen!! Please save your money, unless you want to see EXTREMELY BAD ACTING, poor writing and bad directing. It seems like their entire budget was spent only on special effects and that they forgot about everything else. Unless this movie was targeting a 0 - 12 year old audience, I don’t see how this producer or director could have consciously released it without being under the influence of some kind of drug or alcohol!!! PS:Don’t even rent it, because the time you will waste on it can never be regained.
1/10
27.3.2006 - sirshak@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie was horrible. Me and my friend both feel asleep. For the amount of people that died, there was major lack of blood.
1/10
25.3.2006 - mrs,draco,malfoy@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
If you don't care how bad the acting is and just want to see Milla kicking ass and tight outfits, then you should definitely see this movie.
6/10
23.3.2006 - jstern78@ - age: 26-35
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I think it was pretty good but coulda bin better. It needs more excitment and all that but I think it is a good movie and lots of others may enjoy it to.
6/10
20.3.2006 - lila_lover_tiila@ - age: 1-12
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I would have rather watched a series of national geographics! One of my friends actually fell asleep. Definitely without a doubt the worst movie I have ever seen. You couldnt pay me to watch it again.
1/10
19.3.2006 - little_miss_blabbermouth@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I enjoyed it, however for a movie with its underlying theme BLOOD there was such a lack of it. The fight scenes could have varried but I still enjoyed the movie.
7/10
19.3.2006 - mr_teri_e_novel@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I thought it was good and actioned packed ahahaha yes [...]
7/10
19.3.2006 - bester246@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 




Only good if you wanna see Mila in tight pants and a crop top.
3/10
19.3.2006 - allisonschmidt@ - age: 26-35
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Really great movie. I went to see this movie with my friend not for some story, but for the action, the cool effect and wicked looking actress that kicks butt.
10/10
18.3.2006 - blackboxhell666@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Was counting on special effects to make this movie bearable and they fell through even on that. Writing terrible, cliches abound, weak acting, Milla was much better in Fifth element.
1/10
18.3.2006 - chaps47@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
What is everyone talking about? This was the greatest movie ever great action great speacial affects great every thing!!!
10/10
18.3.2006 - loony_6041@ - age: 1-12
18 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Way too much CGI, even for a comic based movie. No realistic plot line. Acting... Where was it? Dreadful action sequences. You root for the antagonist because Mila's failure would make a better movie. DO NOT SEE IT.
2/10
18.3.2006 - domtheron@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
The movie was okay if you ask me I thought it would of been a lot better tho I actually got a little bored watchin it at some parts, but its all good its still good to go see tho so its all good.
6/10
17.3.2006 - sweet_angel_girl152004@ - age: 13-17
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
So bad!!! Do not waste your time, or money seeing this movie. No story, no plot, no character development, no ending, completely horrible!
1/10
17.3.2006 - elysianrain@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
No plot, no story line, and dragged out for not being a very long movie in the first place. The only cool part was that she could change her clothes and hair colour by thinking.
2/10
17.3.2006 - lealea@ - age: 18-25
6 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Just to be fare, I love brainless action movies to take my mind of things, I even gave doom a good rating (8-9 I think), but this, well, I can't say much for acting because the actors had nothing concrete to act about... everybody knows Mila is a good actress, but there was no supporting story for her to act upon, I give 5 because although the movie does lack severely a proper story line(plot), although it is there, the choreography was original(esp. Bullet dodging scene). weapon retreival... some new gadgets... etc. Over all the movie was not well written. If you want to see it go for it, it is not a 100% percent waste of money as some people do like it alot.
5/10
17.3.2006 - fsekh_na@ - age: 18-25
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It was the worst movie ever... I was better off watching Family guy at home. I wouldnt watch this movie if it was for free... better yet I wouldnt watch it if you paid me... by the first 10 mins you will leave.. sleep... or start throwing popcorn.
1/10
17.3.2006 - biggc_baller@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I knew coming into it that it was gonna be pretty much all action, a sexy main character, and poor story line. And well that's what I got.
10/10
17.3.2006 - kung_fuuuu@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie was probably one of the worst movies I have ever seen in a movie theatre. The plot is unclear and the acting is horrible. If you ever feel a unbearable desire to see this film, Wait for it to come out on DVD, but seriously, it's not worth watching even if you are able to watch it for free.
3/10
16.3.2006 - dahlberg,daniel@ - age: 13-17
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I went to this movie with my Dad. It was cool. Lots of good fights.
8/10
16.3.2006 - gary_genik@ - age: 1-12
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
In the preivews they discribe it as "The US made stronger soldiers but they became too strong" The movie isnt about that whatsoever. It is about a virus that got released and now the government wants to exterminate the virus carriers. The motorcycle scean they had was horrible. The actual quality of film was blurry and poor, the plot didnt make sense and there was a lot of holes in the whole storyline.
3/10
16.3.2006 - jonesysdreamcatcher@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Well, this was a complete waste of time, I watched about 20 minutes and after that you realize that the movie is completly ridiculous, I mean the concept of the movie makes you think it could be a great action thriller, but it is just way to far fetched... I left an watched the hills have eyes... the only good thing was that ultraviolet made the hills have eyes look like an award winner.
1/10
16.3.2006 - kokanee2004@ - age: 18-25
6 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
What are you people thinking? Don't call the story bad because you don't understand it. The action was amazing, but the number one reason to see it is Milla.
9/10
15.3.2006 - kingpig87@ - age: 13-17
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Absolute garbage! I still dont know what the movie was about. I couldn't concentrate for more than five minutes at a time. It was the worst acting ever... anyone could have done a better job than that. Let me have the director and the writers contacts and let them know because if they ever think of doing another movie... I don't want to go see it.
1/10
15.3.2006 - nikki_more@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It is definitely great for kids who want to see action without any real plot. This movie is so far fetched that it is laughable. I liked Resident Evil so I thought this would be something like it but this movie is a far cry from even a 'B-movie'. I was disappointed in this movie and I doubt anyone in my age bracket would like it at all.
4/10
14.3.2006 - paulleslie12@ - age: 26-35
221 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
When I first saw the previews for this movie I believed that this movie was going to be a let down. I also believed the storyline was going to be aweful and the movie only based around action. But what I saw surprised me. It wasnt nearly as bad as I expected it to be. If anything, I would say it is both well done and a great flick. Of course, the action was awesome, the special effects were as well. But the storyline was well thought out and made sense. It was not at all confusing, but there were some instances were you had to figure things out on your own. But one of the things that continues to confuse me is why would they make her hair turn violet only twice? And then only in the beginning of the movie? It was like they got lazy and forgot to change it again. Other than that, this movie is one that I would be willing to see more than twice.
8/10
14.3.2006 - dead,and,gone@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Should have gone stright to DVD. The story was poor, acting was very bad and the over all movie was nor interesting at all. It was more like watching a video game.
2/10
14.3.2006 - rbailey3000@ - age: 26-35
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
It was a good movie to see. I was expecting much more scenes besides just the "Oh theres another group of evil ones we must kill" kind of thing. Very dissapointing. I was expecting much more out of it.
6/10
14.3.2006 - xo_roxybaby_xo@ - age: 13-17
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Good movie. Worth seeing if you enjoy action. Don't expect tartino/woo story style. Story is a dirty stinkbomb but the action is amazing. The Way she reloads should make you laugh in the best way.
8/10
14.3.2006 - paul,korycki@ - age: 18-25
4 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
While looking her usual hot and utterly delectable self, Milla spends 90 minutes kicking butt, running around, engaging in a wide array of gymnastics and, of course, killing people. I have no problem with this. This is what I paid to see and this is what I got. If you see Passion of the Christ, you go to see Jesus being scourged. If you go see The Hills Have Eyes, you expect to see rape, killing and cannibalism (though not necessarily in that order) If you go see Ultraviolet, you expect to see the exquisite Milla kicking butt. That is plenty for this fella! Enjoy!
10/10
14.3.2006 - vangleasonthemagnificent@ - age: 36-49
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I dont know what all these people were talking about but this movie should be made into a DVD and sold in the stores cause it was an excellent movie. If u saw the pre-views than u would have liked the movie - most of you probably havent even seen the movie - cause it was really good.
10/10
13.3.2006 - cutiegurl6@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
My wife and I went to see this movie in the hopes it would be something like Resident Evil. The previews gave it the appearance of being a stellar action film. We managed to see about 45 minutes of the movie before we had to leave. It was absolutely aweful. The action is completely unrealistic, the dialogue is shoddy, and there is nothing to get into. In the name of all things holy save your time and money and dont bother with this movie (unless of course you thought Battlefield Earth was the greatest movie ever)
1/10
13.3.2006 - kawika07@ - age: 26-35
17 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
windowtop
windowtop
Note: Reviews posted on this page are personal opinions expressed by our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.
Click for other reviews:
[1-50]  [51-100]   [101-136]  

windowtop
windowtop
Did you see ''Ultraviolet''?

How do you rate this movie?



Please elaborate. Write your comment here:




Your age:     Male:   Female:
(optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
The first part of your e-mail (before the @ sign) and your age group will be published.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.


windowtop
windowtop







Home · Top 10 · Playing · Upcoming · Trailers · A to Z · Theatres
 DVD Calendar · Blu-ray · Shopping Cart
Promotions · Change City · Contact Us · USA · Français
 
Copyright © 1996-2009 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.