|
Showing all 44 reviews...
|
|
 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Valentine was a really scary movie to me and the beginning gave me goosebumps as well. To make a long story short. Valentine is a slasher/horror. All I want to know is when they are going to make a sequel to this movie because at the end you see adamn and lily together holding each other and blood goes down here face and then you see adamn starting to have a nose bleed and smiles. Also after that happens the screen goes black and you hear a girl scream. Did adam kill lily or what?
7/10
26.12.2007 -
alinallano@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I think the movie was hella tight. I would see it again. I like the part when the Killer killed the girl in the jaccusi. It was tight.
8/10
6.3.2006 -
angelmama0502@ - age: 13-17
I loved the movie it was the bomb well gotta go.
10/10
2.12.2005 -
angelbug_1990@ - age: 26-35
Amazing movie considering the style!!!
9/10
22.9.2004 -
magicdude96@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Valentine freaked me out... It was really well made and I loved the murders (Although most of them were predictable) I loved when Shelley got her throat slit, Lilly got shot by arrows and Paige got electrocuted in the jacuzi... Anyway, I loved it so go ahead and see it!
9/10
2.9.2004 -
badboy15153119@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
I believed thhat Valenine was a half decent film worth seeing. But what I liked was the twist at the end of the film.
7/10
15.12.2003 -
alcapone19872003@ - age: 13-17
Pretty good... loved cupid... Angel rocks... Dorothy is not the killer... it's the dude who plays Angel on Buffy and on Angel.
7/10
2.11.2003 -
funnygirl_2790@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
I thought the movie Valentine was very scary, and it had a good plot. The cast selections were very well picked by Jamie Blanks. I think the love story between Kate (Marley Shelton) and Adam (David Boreanaz) was pretty romantic. I don't know why the killer didn't kill Kate. I think the reason was that she didn't critize him in the past, but the other girls did. When I found out that the killer, Jeremy Melton, was really Adam, that really freaked me out. He loved Kate so much that he never showed who he really was. I had a real problem with the ending though. It showed Kate and Adam holding each other and then blood drips down Kate's face and then we see Adam's nose bleeding, then he smiles, and then the screen goes black with someone screaming at the end. I wonder if Adam killed or didn't kill her, she killed him, if they stayed together with the secret not being told, well it just doesn't make any since. I would not be surprised if they did or did not do a sequel. I think that there are some questions that still need to be answered.
8/10
13.7.2003 -
richardrae@ - age: 1-12
I though the movie was VERY scary, I will see it again and I think you should see it also.
7/10
25.1.2003 -
qtdaisy89@ - age: 13-17
Well, it was a pretty good movie. You see, it shouldn't really be called a horror movie. It should be under the drama/mystery/romance categorie. I laughed and some parts were sorta scary. It was okay. I'd go see it again.
9/10
2.2.2002 -
cherub@ - age: 13-17
The movie was ok but the ending was very weird.
7/10
25.7.2001 -
iced@ - age: 18-25
The movie is really SCARY. All the actors did a great job. I could see that movie a 100 times if could. You MUST see it.
10/10
10.6.2001 -
joseamaya23@ - age: 13-17
Realy I want to see this movie again.
9/10
12.4.2001 -
global_gems@ - age: 26-35
It was pretty good, but it was your average horror movie. People get killed, blood and guts and not to mention kinda predicable.
7/10
6.3.2001 -
cyberchick29@
Well, I would not mind if this movie would spark off a sequal because then it would give me a chance to NOT SEE IT!!! IF you like cheap films please see this one, however its no Friday the 13th! Rather its Feb. 14th - and not a very good one at that!
6/10
24.2.2001 -
clucki@ - age: 18-25
It wasn't THAT bad... But the story-line could've been more impressive.
6/10
22.2.2001 -
lizdamon@ - age: 13-17
I thought that it was a good movie, good climax, good plot. I would not go see it again though.
8/10
22.2.2001 -
coolkicks2@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
(banging noise) "Hello? ... Is anybody there? ... Hello?" How much of that crap can you digest, that is the true question. I still can't believe a woman covered in a towel comes out of the shower and out of her appartment to investigate a noise all the way to the elevator at the end of the appartment building corridor (? !!)... And why is it that when authorities tell helpless women to stay together because there's a killer on the lose, those very women decide they will spend the night alone with their windows unlocked and opened to feel the cool night breeze... Of course, the intelligence of the characters is displayed in an outstanding epanage of wits: why don't I hide in a room where I will have no way out of should the killer following me enter it... And women, PLEASE learn some self-defense techniques!!... Don't go out screaming but at least have the decency to kick a man in the groin will ya! All right!!... I have been waiting for this film all year, for I wanted to give a 1 to a movie and now my prayers have been answered... And NO, the beautiful women with luscious lips and shapely bodies are not saving this "production" from execution... Valentine that...
1/10
21.2.2001 -
ncskills@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I saw Valentine and I thought it was pretty good. I mean the plot was a no brainer, and it was very predictable. But it's a good movie it you want to get scared for fun. It's definitely not the scariest movie, but it was fun to watch.
6/10
21.2.2001 -
hellokitty005@ - age: 13-17
I thought the movie lacked in certin areas, such as suspence but all in all it was worth the 7.50 I paid to watch it I suggest you should definatly watch it or at least rent it.
7/10
20.2.2001 -
psamsonit48@ - age: 13-17
This movie was great. Maybe not the best horror movie made but it was still a fantastic movie. I'm 11 years old but I'm tall I got in as a 13 year old cool!!! This movie was good and I'd strongly recomend to go see it at night.
10/10
17.2.2001 -
wasntme_9292@ - age: 1-12
I loved that movie. It was really unexpected and awesome and David. B was soooo hot!!!
10/10
17.2.2001 -
niweizman@ - age: 13-17
I am sure is the WORST MOVIE I've seen this year. Don't go watch this movie, it's just stupid and the story doesn't make any sense.
2/10
15.2.2001 -
sacu99@ - age: 18-25
We really enjoyed this movie. Granted, the ending was obvious, and the actors were just O.K., but it was very entertaining nonetheless. Although every pre-teen and some teens will go see this movie for David Boreanaz, it's not really a movie for pre-teens. There is too much violence and foul language. And we should always be bothered when there is so much violence directed towards women. You have to view this movie not as a masterpiece, but as a good piece of entertainment, with posh settings, pretty people, and some action, and did I mention David Boreanaz? A couple of times, you ARE going to be on the edge of your seat. The setting reminded me of a much superior movie called "The Eyes of Laura Mars". In all honesty, David Boreanaz could just recite the phone book, that every hot blooded female I know would be glued to the screen. "He's no ANGEL, but... "
7/10
10.2.2001 -
clan@ - age: 36-49
| 
