|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 56)
|
|
 |
I thought it was a really random movie which made it so good. Actually the fact that it was funny and that Jack Black's in it made it so good. It's stupid but you keep watching it. I loved it!
9/10
27.9.2009 -
xox_delta94@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
It's been a little while since I saw this, but I think it was funny in a way similar to Napoleon Dynamite: so much of the movie is so flat that the only thing you remember later is the funny parts. The storyline was a bit weak, but if you want something to just bear through to talk about later... find someone to rent it for you =P.
8/10
29.1.2007 -
zelda,champion@ - age: 13-17
The story line is very weak, it would have been funnier if they kept with the dark humor and just made it dark comedy rather than try to brighten it up at time.
3/10
21.11.2006 -
cfh_trendkill@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Yeah I saw Envy and I liked it a lot. I knew that it wasn't a comedy before I saw it. The result is good, it deals with the jalousy that exists in every one of us and I found that idea pretty interesting to be treated as the main subject in a movie.
8/10
4.11.2005 -
anb@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Definitely not funny. I give a 3 to the joke of ''the little person'', which was the only good joke of the movie.
3/10
3.7.2005 -
krayzie_lady@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
This movie would get a ZERO if allowed. Two of the funniest actors out there ruined their reputaion in my book. How the director managed to make such a terrifically terrible movie with such great actor I will never know. [...] :(.
1/10
15.2.2005 -
jonvank@ - age: 18-25
I love the movie so much I really love Jack Black and Ben Stiller they are so Hot.
9/10
30.11.2004 -
eelliott@ - age: 18-25
I just saw this movie for free while traveling. So, it's not like it was my choice, just killed the time. It was cute. Jack really shows his acting abilities, with all his enthusiasim. Ben kind of sucks though. I laughed in places.
6/10
4.8.2004 -
cliffa@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
I really liked this movie, I dont know how other people don't. I thought even though parts of it were cheesy, they all fit together, nevermind the fact that the whole movie was supposed to be pretty stupid. Who can honestly say that a movie about "Va-poo-rize" is actually serious?
7/10
11.7.2004 -
dakota_gurl024@ - age: 18-25
Best movie ever! Loved it, it was fanominal best use of my money in years.
10/10
4.7.2004 -
undercovercop18@ - age: 18-25
This was the bets movie that I've ever seen! Even if you have a client on the phoneline- ditch them and go see this movie NOW!!!
10/10
2.7.2004 -
madsion,wood@ - age: 1-12
Go Jack Black. Ben Stiller is good too."Where does the S**t go? " Watch the movie, and tell me the answer.
9/10
4.6.2004 -
da_spartan@ - age: 18-25
How sad that these funny actors had to degrade themselves with this movie. We kept waiting for it to get better, then it was over. Waste of time and money.
2/10
30.5.2004 -
ekhenry@ - age: 26-35
The movie sucked balls for Jack Black school of rock was good and for Stiller duplex or zoolander but and then they to decide and make this peice or crap geeze if u want to put your grama somwhere to make her shut up take her to shrek 2 not envy it is a lousie movie do not waist ten dollars on it.
1/10
28.5.2004 -
kcin337_2@ - age: 1-12
How can something like this exist?
1/10
28.5.2004 -
sergybi@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
It was a huge waste of time! The script was mentily chalenged... pethedic! If you want to stay awake go see a diferent movie! Signed: discusted.
1/10
24.5.2004 -
soccer118@ - age: 13-17
Classic Ben Stiller! But you have to like his humor (zoolander, There's S about M) It was entertaining, with a few really great laughs, but a bit dragging. This would have been more enjoyed as a short film than anything else I think.
6/10
22.5.2004 -
davidtoushek@ - age: 26-35
Worst movie ever... really how can anyone sit throught it... apart from wanting to see how more ohirble it can get? It's a great movie to recomend to someone you hate... or something like that! This movie was about Sh**... and it was sh**!
1/10
16.5.2004 -
industrial_dee@ - age: 18-25
The only reason this is a three/ten is because of the one funny part at the roadblock. This is a really good idea for a movie, but is surrounded by a terrible script. This seems like one of those movies that Stiller and Black filmed on weekends while shooting a blockbuster at the same time. For Black it was School Of Rock, and for Stiller it was Dodgeball. Do not see this movie. Stay home and watch the Flames kick the Sharks butts. GO FLAMES GO.
3/10
15.5.2004 -
buzz882@ - age: 13-17
Do not waste a minute of your time on this train wreck. The script should have been used to keep some poor family warm this winter... by burning it!!!
1/10
15.5.2004 -
tonymassop@ - age: 26-35
I think it was really funny.
10/10
13.5.2004 -
gymnastics_melissa@ - age: 18-25
Don't waste a penny on it. What a shame Stiller and Black wasted their time making this movie.
2/10
12.5.2004 -
rlebel@ - age: 18-25
I went and saw this movie because, well, I got sucked in by the previews. I have to say, I think this is the best performance of Ben Stiller and Jack Black I have yet to see. Doesn't say much, does it? Same characters as every other movie they play in.
5/10
12.5.2004 -
deaduno101@ - age: 26-35
Worst movie ever, I lost two hours in my life.
1/10
11.5.2004 -
isabelle,samson-bureau@ - age: 18-25
Yay good movie.
10/10
10.5.2004 -
mapleleafsrock@ - age: 1-12
Best movie ever with a sharp script and by best I mean worst and by sharp I mean retarded. I truely believe people that liked this movie have a distint character flaw, but what do I know? , GO LEAFS GO.
1/10
8.5.2004 -
trev_johnston@ - age: 18-25
There were some fuy stff, but overall I dont like it.
1/10
8.5.2004 -
abosattam@ - age: 26-35
All I can say is KILL ME. The worst movie of the year. I can stay at home in my bed and be more amuzed. BAD MOVIE...
1/10
7.5.2004 -
fifa60@ - age: 18-25
Expected more from Ben Stiller, (although Zoolander played on TV this week which I guess if I saw it before going to the movie I would have chosen differently) Wait for it to come to television, not really even worth renting. There are some funny moments but not enough. Its like being trapped on the highway in a slowdown, its nice to move once in awhile but it doesn't make the trip any better!
4/10
7.5.2004 -
rcgsam@ - age: 36-49
Pretty brutal... didn't see the mic shots but kept finding myself searching for funny stuff that this stacked cast just never produced for me. Good thing I went on cheap night but I still feel ripped off!
3/10
6.5.2004 -
kgb508@ - age: 18-25
Ok movie... kinda funny in some parts, kinda stupid funny... I didnt see any mic's though but I see the reason now y there was only like 8 ppl in the movie theater.
4/10
6.5.2004 -
cookie_dough159@ - age: 13-17
The cast was good the script wasn't if you want to catch up on some sleep than go see it.
3/10
6.5.2004 -
ckenyon@ - age: 36-49
There were some funny moments in the movie, but only worth it if you rent it for 2 dollars! I really would have thought that if Ben Stiller had played the other lead character, it might have been a little better, but still not good enough.
5/10
5.5.2004 -
mariesantos1976@ - age: 26-35
A total waste of time and money. It was the worst movie I have seen since Molan Rouge, if you have 10 bucks to waiste give it to charity.
1/10
4.5.2004 -
kalutz@ - age: 36-49
Did'nt like it at all.
1/10
4.5.2004 -
razork@ - age: 18-25
This movie sucks. Keep your money. Only chris Walken was good. That's it.
2/10
3.5.2004 -
dunucchi@ - age: 18-25
This movie was terrible - I couldn't wait for it to be over - what a waste of money... The microphones really ticked me off - I mean.. did they put this slop together in a weekend with a $50.00 budget? I will seriously consider never seeing one of Jack Black or Ben Stiller's movies again!
1/10
3.5.2004 -
grade3teacher@ - age: 26-35
The movie was well done, and truely hilarious. Chistopher Walken is fantastic. The humour is an aquired taste, as I was one of the only people laughing through the entire thing.
8/10
3.5.2004 -
alden_f1@ - age: 18-25
Worst Movie I have ever seen. Three amazing actors, and a horrible movie, I don't get it! I didn't laugh once, and I kept waiting for it to get funny, but it never did!
1/10
2.5.2004 -
alanasullivan@ - age: 18-25
Terrible, but not the worst of the year. It wasn't funny, but had a couple moments. Walken is the only saving grace in this movie. Not worth seeing unless it is completely free. There are much better fish in the sea.
4/10
2.5.2004 -
jim_d_73@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
The only reason people stayed to the end of the movie was that they were giving free passes at the end. This movie is bad and I could not believe how many mic shots there were... I. E. you could see the sound mic above the actors... it seemed like they shot this movie over the weekend and were determined to complete it no matter the product. There were some funny moments but it was a waste of time and although a good idea... the execution of it was horrible. Everyone involved should be ashamed of themselves.
2/10
2.5.2004 -
issa23@ - age: 26-35
This movie was the worst movie ever there was not one second of it that was funny it almost made me sick!!! I hate this movie.
1/10
2.5.2004 -
tristanedwards387@ - age: 13-17
It sucks.
1/10
2.5.2004 -
bali_rules@ - age: 1-12
What a "pile of crap". If only someone had a spray like that for bad movies! Lol... don't waste your time or your money.
1/10
2.5.2004 -
fswkong@ - age: 26-35
The reason I gave it a [1] is coz I would never think Jack Black and Ben Stiller would accept such a boring script for a movie. In the middle of the movie I literally wanted to leave. I love these 2 actors but what a disappointment. The previews are all there is to it, no other funny parts AT ALL. Kids prob like it, but not us...
1/10
2.5.2004 -
tomirna@ - age: 18-25
Disappointing movie... and with such a great cast!! Christopher Walken made the movie better with his scenes. Very boring at times, poor storyline.
5/10
2.5.2004 -
viewertwo@ - age: 36-49
I was bored throughout the entire movie, even for a comedy it had a horrible story line. I do not recommend it to anyone. Very poor script and plot, some good actors in a crappy movie.
3/10
2.5.2004 -
bloodink@ - age: 13-17
What's all this hype coming from? What's so funny about it? Just plain ordinary..
5/10
1.5.2004 -
bigmike1989@
| 
