CinemaClock   
Toronto    
  Français 
Home Top 10 Playing Upcoming Trailers A to Z Theatres DVD

Urban Legends: The Final Cut
 
windowtop
windowtop
24 user reviews

4.4/10

Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age:   1-12    13-17   18-25   26-35   36-49    50+    Total  
Men:
Votes:
-
0
4
4
1.2
4
4.7
6
-
0
-
0
3.5
14
Women:
Votes:
3
1
8
1
3.7
3
5.3
3
-
0
-
0
4.7
8
Total:
Votes:
3
1
6
7
2.3
7
4.9
9
-
0
-
0
4.4
24
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex.

windowtop
windowtop

Click here to write your review and to vote!
Filter reviews
windowtop
windowtop
Showing all 24 reviews...

Awful, awful movie, shows promise in the first scene when the guy wakes up in the tub full of ice with his kidney missing but totally falls apart after that, the first one was ok but this was a total bomb.
1/10
29.10.2004 - crazy33@ - age: 18-25
66 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie is very bad, I don't like because have other director and actors. I classify the movie (1-10) 3. for pain.
3/10
18.11.2001 - paulabayona18@ - age: 1-12
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Excellent movie, very cool, the thing that I don't like was that in the second part was with others actors differents between the first part and the director was different, but the movie was good.
9/10
18.11.2001 - andresbayona14@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
It was o.k. but the first one was better, keeps you in suspense anyway and you don't suspect the murderer... And the finally you sort of laugh when you saw the first movie.
7/10
5.3.2001 - nstmartin84@ - age: 26-35
80 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie is not scary. The acting is bad and the plot is pathetic. The murders have nothing to do with "urban legends". It is a waste of time.
2/10
18.2.2001 - owen_drummer@ - age: 26-35
14 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I didn't see the first one, so I didn't know what to expect. But, I saw this movie after "Bless the child" and what a relief. This one kept some of my interest, and overall, I was enjoying it (maybe because the first movie was poor, this one seemed better? )
6/10
17.2.2001 - misio@ - age: 26-35
23 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Very predictable, however, it was much better than the first one!
6/10
1.11.2000 - cyndi83@ - age: 18-25
34 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The first one was better, there weren't even many Urban Legends that took place. Everything that happened is too obvious. I predicted everything that happened.
6/10
15.10.2000 - jmarx12@ - age: 13-17
18 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
"Urban Legends: The Final Cut" tries to live up to the success of the original, but just doesn't "cut" it! The acting is bad, (who told Joey Lawrence he could act? ) and the plot is boring. Where's the suspense? Where's the horror? I don't know but is is definately not in this movie.
3/10
11.10.2000 - tancor1@ - age: 18-25
2 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Urban Legend is a great movie. The author really makes you think the killer is that one guy but it turns out to be someone I didnt expected. It's great! Great scenes! Great special effects! I really liked it, suspense is there all the way... Really fun to watch...
8/10
10.10.2000 - swi_horse@ - age: 13-17
8 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
I thought that this movie was surprisingly entertaining. I normailly hate these kind of flicks like "I know what you... " and that sort of thing but I still liked it.
7/10
8.10.2000 - mikesilas@ - age: 26-35
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Seriously, I really don't understand how this roll of film actually made it into the big screen? In my experiences of being a movie buff, I've never seen anything this bad on the silver-screen! And trust me, if I were to rate this movie, it wouldn't even make into the "low budget b-movie" category. Acting was horrible, and the camera was out of focus for some scenes! Generally, to sum it all up, you would come out of the theatre happier if you were blind and deaf. That way, you didn't have to experience such a tastelessly horrific film. This is definately the worst film of the year! I think theatres would be doing everyone a favor gave that roll of film a public burning.
1/10
3.10.2000 - urameatball@ - age: 18-25
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 




I went to see this movie without expecting anything, but it turned out not bad at all. It is scary, especially some killer scenary, I found myself hiding sometimes because it's too scary. If you are a scary-movie fun, you should go to see it.
7/10
2.10.2000 - neverlie@ - age: 26-35
5 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This movie has nothing to do with the orginal. Theres only one old urban legend scene in this movie, the beginning. I thought the end was good, a nice twist if you saw the first one. Wait for video if you must see this.
6/10
29.9.2000 - chad2674@ - age: 26-35
7 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
Boring!
2/10
28.9.2000 - mbelair@ - age: 13-17
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
Don't see this movie if you have a LIFE!!!... And for those who like this movie... GET A LIFE!!!
2/10
28.9.2000 - princess_zee@ - age: 18-25
First review.Post a Reply
 
 
I liked the first one very much. Rarelly have I've seen a sequal and liked it, but this one must have been one of the worse ones I've ever seen. It is a joke, an insult to the name of the original. Wait for the 2/1 at the video store.
2/10
27.9.2000 - seb_bro@ - age: 18-25
3 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
The movie was not the best but was not the worst ive ever seen. Worth it if you get 2/1 tickets.
6/10
26.9.2000 - scooter_wood@ - age: 26-35
8 reviews - click to viewPost a Reply
 
 
This Movie is really bad... I hated it... don't go for it it is not worth it not even on video.
1/10