|
Showing all 26 reviews...
|
|
 |
Very nice story, but it may seem disjointed without having first read the book. Good escape into a simpler time.
7/10
6.5.2004 -
patnkat@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
This movie made me cry and the acting was great. I just loved this movie. 2 thumps up. Great job Stephen King.
10/10
28.3.2004 -
jjpat93@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
I love this movie!
10/10
27.1.2003 -
spacegrimms@ - age: 13-17
Loved it... very intriguing.
8/10
8.9.2002 -
steveandirenelangley@ - age: 18-25
Good movie VERY resembling to the book except, it's only one part of the book.
8/10
27.8.2002 -
martn2420@ - age: 13-17
Very touching movie. Lacked a little something though... Shed a few tears... but it didn't grip you like I thought it would from the advertising. It is a good movie to watch though!
7/10
6.4.2002 -
female@ - age: 26-35
Not a bad movie but not a good one either. I expected more supernatural instead of a poor cinema paradiso ripoff.
6/10
3.12.2001 -
piovanno@ - age: 26-35
Really good story, though somewhat sad. Deserves a longer run and better reviews.
9/10
28.11.2001 -
michaelpeirson@ - age: 26-35
I read the book and this was better, mainly because the book was retarded with a retarded ending that made no sense. In the movie, the ending was more believable. As well, the acting was great; Hopkins was his usual great self, and the kid, Anton Yelchin, was a terrific little actor. You know, there are so many good child actors out there, it makes me wonder how in the name of all that is holy did George Lucas settle for such an unnatural twerp as Jake Lloyd? Jar Jar didn't ruin Phantom Menace; if anyone did, it was the kid. Anyways, I ramble. Hearts in Atlantis, good flick, cute, entertaining, touching, I dug it.
8/10
26.11.2001 -
newscott13@ - age: 26-35
|
