|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 442)
|
|
 |
On me. Every reaction the forests And grapes, a bit of took scissors with a are all I still.
2/10
5.4.2008 -
skiseua@ - age: 36-49
Suggested then. Scissors a bit of more than were punished along the wild that parents to it that.
1/10
5.4.2008 -
dbsiwwx@ - age: 18-25
Good job by Night, this movie right up there with The six sense & Unbreakable. The performance by Joaquin & Mel were good.
8/10
26.11.2006 -
sentenza99@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
[...] I thought this film was great and what was even greater was that a day after I watched this film the was 2 fields with crops circles about 5 minutes away from were I live!!! I think that Mel Gibson did very well in acting on this film and people that say he didn't are just flippen jealouse because he is a very good actor!!!
10/10
19.6.2006 -
soraya4mcfly@ - age: 1-12
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This was a great movie. Everything was in a place for a reason. The brother being a baseball player, Bo not finishing her water, and the other kid having asthma. Great, great movie.
10/10
22.3.2006 -
yeah_okok@
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I don't quite get the movie. I don't find it scary at all. The story goes pretty slow. I don't get what the intentions of the aliens are. And at the end of the movie, people seem to assume it was faith in God that saved the kid, couldn't it have been the alien who saved him? I mean, the alien did spray him with something... and who knows what it is.
5/10
1.8.2005 -
talon_greywolf@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Indeed, this movie could have been much better. I feel awkward giving M. Shyamalan advice on how to direct his movies in the future (having also seen The Village, which by the way is rated along the same lines as I rate this one) but I believe that part of the intrigue rests on uncertainty. As M. Shyamalan said himself, "what we are all afraid of is the unknown. We all fear what we cannot see, what we do not know, for example the dark." I believe that to be very accurate, but Shyamalan doesn't feature this into Signs (or The Village for that matter) In my opinion, this movie fails at the very end. It is in showing us the alien that we have feared throughout the whole movie that he loses it. The flow of the film is interupted by the revelation of the monster because it is as if the director is saying : "Look, here's the monster, he's not that freaky... Look at him! " Shyamalan destroys the uncertainty that kept our blood chilly throughout the movie. He unmasks the unknown. The whole movie is then put to question as a result. But before the ending, the movie is quite spectacular. The movie has an amazing aspect of mystery which keeps us binded to the movie. The acting couldn't be much better. The characters themselves radiate a delicious mist of mystery. For example, Mel Gibason's daughter is extremely mysterious. We sort of hold a grudge against her because the director makes us suspect that she will play a role at the very end. The whole movie is draped in a curtain of mystery which we long to be uncovered by a great conclusion. What a shame that it doesn't come.
6/10
19.12.2004 -
booyatom@ - age: 13-17
I don't understand what it is talking about. I think it is one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. If Mel Gibson didn't play a a role in it, I would never choose to watch. And the truth is that my first impression is right: this movie sucks.
2/10
13.6.2004 -
lorili7029@ - age: 26-35
I think Signs is one of the best movie's ever, it's so great and scary, the ending is the best part. It's just so... cool!!! I saw one review saying "Why did the wife die", well if she hadn't died, they'd all be dead!
10/10
17.4.2004 -
super_namek91@ - age: 13-17
Wow, this movie is goood! It's freaky, not because it's gory, it'S not. It's because it's psychological. See this movie.
10/10
14.3.2004 -
c_tisseyre@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
M. Night Shamylan did a great third movie, and did this one his best. The dark atmosphere and the gripping sensation of what is going to happen next kept you on the edge of your seat, with your hands over your eyes, but still peeking through them to see what happens. SEE IT NOW!!!
10/10
13.2.2004 -
jhozadima@ - age: 18-25
... Undescribably wonderful... Shows that God DOES exist...
10/10
6.9.2003 -
tomshay@ - age: 1-12
I think the movie is excellent. It contains superstition with horror and is thoroughly enjoyable to watch. The fact that JAUQUIN PHOENIX stars in this movie is an added bonus!
10/10
20.8.2003 -
ip104j1034@ - age: 13-17
I believe this movie was more about faith than little green man from mars. It is more than just eye candy or a shoot-um up adventure, it had heart. A movie with real substance is rare. I give it an 8.
8/10
13.8.2003 -
ptm56@ - age: 36-49
It was the best movie ever!! I was so scared the first time I watched it. And the second and third. I've seen it like 13 times, and I still love it! The aliens were so cool! I watched it one night with my brothers and we were all very freaked out. I hope M. Night makes a Signs part 2!
10/10
3.7.2003 -
sk8boarder2003@ - age: 1-12
I thought it was a very weird movie I didn't like it.
3/10
14.6.2003 -
dricci@ - age: 1-12
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The Movie was Awful, DEAD AWFUL. Look for one, 1. The movie's plot had nothing to do with the title. 2. The characters were not appealing 3. The aliens are not scary, and they look lame, and oh yea, Hoeky! 4. The Spoiled brat Culkin, killed his dog, he murdered his dog. And he didn't care, he didn't feel sad what he did, (Jeez le weez, talk about GREAT EMOTION) 5. No one dies, except for the ones that SHOULDN'T OF DIED, such as (the two (adorible german shepards, and the wife, why did SHE have to Die! A car! Pleaaase) 6. I'm sorry I have heard christians seen this said it was GOOD. But losing your faith in God, isn't the way to go, is it just me or should this movie be called (Signs) The title truly is retarted. Anyway, I don't like M N. Shylaman's work, he's a lousy director, and should go back t |
