|
Showing all 33 reviews...
|
|
 |
Pointless crap.
1/10
11.1.2004 -
innuendo@ - age: 18-25
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It had some good parts like Christopher Lambert death seen but I didn't want him to die! Over all though the movie was kinda disappointing.
5/10
20.11.2003 -
penancez@ - age: 18-25
I'm A Highlander Fan But This Was Not All That It Should Have Been.
6/10
2.8.2003 -
davecouture@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
You only enjoy this film if you are a loyal Highlander fan, but even then it's a bit confusing and whats the point killing of the main charachter.
6/10
24.7.2003 -
muhamed@ - age: 13-17
I was a true weekly fan of highlander. I watched the tv series for its entire duration. In addition I saw the films. When I heard about this new highlander movie Highlander: Endgame I was thrilled. A) Adrian Paul is a spectactualar actor and B) I was glad to see him again because I was quit disappointed when his tv series was ended. There were a few sections of this movie which confused me a bit. By watching the entire film and having pervious knowlage of the story line I was able to quickly figure it out therefore it did not take anything away from the movie for me. I was sooo glad this movie came out! I recomend this film to any highlander/Adrian Paul fan.
9/10
8.6.2003 -
aaikidogirl@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
STAY AWAY!!! One of the worst Highlander movies I've ever seen. This movie kills the tradition of the highlander. Coming from Scotland I was very dissapointed to see that Christopher Lambert got killed. I will never watch this movie again!!!
3/10
24.7.2002 -
martin_bullock@ - age: 18-25
BAD BAD BAD -- What I don't get is how they can kill off the main character in present day. Highlander 2 and the other awful sequels were set way in the future. I can't believe I was stupid enough to rent one after hating the other sequels. DO NOT RENT THIS MOVIE -- IT SUCKS!
1/10
16.3.2001 -
eventures_events@ - age: 26-35
Hiya! This movie was... well, pretty much as expected. I've seen the other highlander sequels, and I must say, this is the best one since the first movie. But really, the only place it excelled was at sword-play, the best since Phantom Menace. I'll buy the video when it comes out only for them (and that girl's naked body ;), but I won't waste my money on the DVD. The story is pretty dull. They introduce the new enemy, screw up the timeline, chop off a few heads, do the matress mambo. Everything seemed to be done for no real reason than to put on a sword-fighting exhibition, show rolling heads and naked woman's breasts. Not all bad, but a story and compelling characters would be nice. Anyway, half-decent movie here, worth seeing once if you like good sword-fighting and are into the Highlander series.
6/10
3.10.2000 -
tochaser@ - age: 18-25
Well, here's a movie that will surely disappoint those who loved the TV series. I mean, the aim was to take the good parts of the series and put them into the movie right? Well, quite a failure for that point, apart from the fact that Adrian Paul is playing in the movie, as well as the characters of Methos and Dawson. The storyline and script are really weak, and fights between immortals in groups doesn't really follow the rules that made the first Highlander and the TV series so succesful... But the movie is not completely to be thrown away: the fights are well choregraphed, Adrian Paul is a very good actor, and the grand finale is worth the entry ticket. Only for fans though...
6/10
17.9.2000 -
mpanty@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
I loved this movie! Normally a movie like this wouldn't appeal to me and I initially didn't want to see it, but I am so glad I did! The acting was wonderful and the storyline is what keeps you hooked!
9/10
15.9.2000 -
allenr78@ - age: 18-25
There are some nice flash back in this movie, and a couple (just one or two) combat that were amazing but for the rest, I would say that the story wasn't amazing. Kell the badguy was suppose to be very strong almost invincible but... The end was too cheap. Unless you want to watch a movie with only ten other people in the room, then go see Highlander Endgame.
5/10
11.9.2000 -
ryoku@ - age: 18-25
This movie killed it for me. What was the purpose of this movie, except to drive in the nail deeper? What the heck was 'Edge (WWF)' suppose to be anyway, a big strong guy lifting a plastic boulder? Ha! Ha! That was pretty pathetic. The guy weighs 225 soaking wet, I miss André the giant :(. And what about those retards on motorcycles with cheap replicas of medieval helmets? I was expecting to see the time and date on the lower right corner, or maybe LOW BAT. Sorriest excuse for a movie in a long time, the special effects could rival the 80's movie 'Q', which was a play doh flying lizard with thumbmarks on the side. Although I do not understand anyone liking this movie, I respect those who did. But for me, its a waste of hard earned money.
1/10
11.9.2000 -
jplevac@ - age: 26-35
I am a fan of the highlander movies, but this was just plain bad. Keep the money & don't even bother to rent it.
4/10
9.9.2000 -
scainer@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Much better than I expected... Good story and good effects.
7/10
9.9.2000 -
navyfighter@ - age: 26-35
An action movie without action, bad effects(very bad) that did not even surpass the effects done ten years ago when it was first made. A weak storyline does not even give a soul to this movie. I am not usually this critical, but I am not usually this disappointed. Dominick.
2/10
7.9.2000 -
writernick@ - age: 26-35
Hey if you like fighting scenes and nipples, then you'll definitely like this movie. And of course you gotta like Highlander to understand and enjoy it. I agree that Christopher Lambert is a little too old to play the part, but still a good enough actor though.
7/10
7.9.2000 -
juliemun@ - age: 18-25
Stop IT! Do not make more Highlanders! First part was great, but newer are worse and worse. The last one, Highlander Endgame, is the worst Highlander I saw.
1/10
6.9.2000 -
barondro@ - age: 18-25
Yes, there are some good sword fighting scenes but nothing too impressive. The story is awkward and the flow of the movie is one of the worst I've seen. I am a fan of the Highlander movies but this movie is definitely not up to the standard.
3/10
4.9.2000 -
jn_liu@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Should not even made movie... Just another money-maker like Highlander2...
1/10
4.9.2000 -
pug_stardock@ - age: 18-25
When talking about Highlander, my advice is : ONLY SEE THE ORIGINAL HIGHLANDER MOVIE. It is the story how it was originally intended by the original author of Highlander. Don't watch anything else as it destroy's everything completly. This is how I feel after seeing one after another disappointing Highlander follow-up movie & tv show. I regret having seen anything else than the first movie. I have my Highlander Director's Cut on video, and I am disregarding all of the other things made. It's not by the original author and in my opinion should never have been made.
1/10
4.9.2000 -
sam_117@ - age: 26-35
I'm a fan of the TV show, this movie was a bad two hour TV show. The sword play was good, but the story line was crap! All the good characters that were introduced in the beginning were written off or not shown towards the end. I hope Adrian Paul will return to the small screen to make more Highlander shows.
4/10
3.9.2000 -
ronniel29@ - age: 26-35
|
