|
Showing all 47 reviews...
|
|
 |
This movie was twisted and disturbing, therefore I loved it! No "Hollywoodizing" in this movie. Hollywood turns out so much crap it's hard to believe that someone in a studio approves it for release. This was definitely not one of those movies!!! It was raw and entertaining.
8/10
7.7.2008 -
casserly5@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Well this was better than that stupid movie House of 1000 Corpses but in saying that it still sucked. Again Zombie rips off a lot of other movies in this sequel and its neither shocking or scary like the trailers made it out to be. Thank God Sheri Moon wasn't annoying in this one with that stupid irritating laugh. Also the only thing that ties the first movie in with the sequel is the family; why even bother to put the ghouls under the graveyard in the first movie if they had absolutely nothing to do with the second? Bizarre. I think Rob Zombie should stick with what he does "best" and make music since he can't direct, has no original ideas for horror movies and rips off other movies. I'm fully expecting him to destroy Halloween. Yet more evidence he can't come up with his own ideas.
5/10
28.8.2007 -
jakatta70@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Pretty interesting movie, lacks Rob Zombie style gore and violence though. Zombie tells the story of the starring characters exceptionally well, its definitely a unique horror experience, a must see for and horror or Rob Zombie fans!!
8/10
19.8.2006 -
lucas_colvin22@ - age: 13-17
Pretty good for a horror movie.
8/10
4.6.2006 -
dzduguay@ - age: 26-35
Rob Zombie cannot act, the second rate b-list hollywood actors that appeared in this movie looked like oscar contenders compard to Rob and his talentless wife. No scares. No suprises. No originality. If your not going to have a engaging story at least have buckets of gore, If your not going to have buckets of gore, then have a engaging story, this movie has neither.
2/10
11.3.2006 -
toadmail@ - age: 26-35
Disturbing and grusome, kept you entertained.
7/10
29.1.2006 -
hotmaleray@ - age: 18-25
Didn't like movie, to much graphic violence.
3/10
18.1.2006 -
meloe@ - age: 36-49
Enjoyed the first movie and enjoyed this one as well but not quite as much. The first movie (while it borrowed from other films) seemed more fresh and this time around seemed more of a regular Hollywood movie, albeit a brutal bloody one. If you liked the first one, how can you not find out what happens to Otis, Baby and the rest of 'em?
7/10
25.8.2005 -
parker2@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
I saw the first one and lefd it, saw the second one and loved it! 7 or 8 people left the theatre and didn't return which tells you it's not for the weak and quivering type. If you like sick and twisted it's a must see.
9/10
11.8.2005 -
ybrc@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Hmmm... well I wish I know a better word to describe this pathetic so called horror movie but I all can come up with is it sucked... it really sucked, it was probably the worst movie I have ever seen... [...] There is hardly any gore, this is suppose to shock you? Hows that? From the guy skining that other guys face and then wearing it? Or ahh... what else is shocking? Maybe that girl getting hit by the truck? Anyway this movie was weak I was seriously looking at my watch and I dont do that often... [...]
1/10
7.8.2005 -
carthous@ - age: 18-25
Boring and not scary at all unless your 5 years old with a ghost in your closet...
1/10
6.8.2005 -
bob1234123412341234@ - age: 18-25
| 
