|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 948)
|
|
 |
It was great but for a spiderman movie it went down. It featured all the emotions but they tried to put to much into it, it could have been much better.
6/10
13.7.2008 -
richyazda42@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
This movie is awesome! Venom could have killed more people but it was still amazing!! Hope there is a number 4.
9/10
4.7.2008 -
diegoborat@ - age: 1-12
This movie made my retina's rebel against my optic nerve which cause me to experience one of the worst headaches of my life! Gremlins took over the editing of this film and that's why there's an emo tribute in the middle... OUT OF NOWHERE!! Die Spiderman die! Hang yourself with your web before you make another horrible movie.
1/10
16.6.2008 -
glendapassmore@ - age: 18-25
This movie has good morality stuff. I did not watch it at the cinema but I did at home. So, there is good action on it, which is I like to see/watch , and overall, it is nice movie and I think you will enjoy watching it.
8/10
11.6.2008 -
henyland_lake03@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Spider-man 3 is very disappointing. Raimi did so well with the first two. But look at this crap, it deserves no awards. It has one really good scene, which I will not identify, but every other scene was either off, cheesy, bizarre, over the top, weak, or just simply bad or stupid. But what was very disappointing was the action, which was taken way too far. In an action scene, the camera movement was head aching to watch, and they had overused the capability of CGI. 98% of every image of spider-man was CGI, unlike the first two. Venom was completely computer generated. Same with Sandman, also for Harry, or Goblin Jr. Also, don’t see it in the IMAX; it is hard enough to watch it in a regular theatre. I don’t know why but I found it very boring in the IMAX. I didn’t like the ending either, as they continue to dwell over Ben’s death which was 2 and a half years ago. So why are they wrecking characters and the whole series? Some may not see as many flaws as I did, but what personally it sucked really badly.
4/10
21.5.2008 -
n,oved@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
The best movie but a little to complicated don't take your 6 year old but you can totally take a 7 year old!!!
7/10
4.5.2008 -
wish_me_love_me@ - age: 1-12
Spiderman 3 is a great movie but a little expensive so I hope the next spiderman movie will cost about $15. I hope that there will be spiderman 4 text year with the lizird and carnage as spidermans foes.
8/10
27.4.2008 -
r2mk@ - age: 1-12
Let's just say I was expecting more. The visual effects are amazing though.
8/10
1.3.2008 -
ronnielib@ - age: 36-49
It is a great movie you should see it so good. ! WOW! Please do not miss it!
8/10
13.2.2008 -
celine-shomali@ - age: 1-12
I guess it is what is expected for number 3 in the series. More of a money grab, with most of the effort spent on advertising. I was very disappointed in Toby’s horrible acting. He was drastically over paid. A very surfacey actor, and wont be surprised if he is now typecast. Parts of the movie requiring him to expand his roll, he just couldn’t pull it off. Kirsten does much better, I just wish we didn’t ask her to sing, it’s horrible. Or is that the point and her great acting? That MJ is a mediocre singer? Oh well, I hope Kirsten makes it through rehab okay. She just went in.
6/10
12.2.2008 -
clifforda@ - age: 36-49
Was looking forward to it for months and walked away terribly dissapointed. The whole movie went off the rails with P. Parker going all Emo.
5/10
9.2.2008 -
hopkinson,todd@ - age: 26-35
I thought it was juss as good as spiderman 1 and 2, go watch it now!
8/10
3.1.2008 -
hidollgirl@ - age: 13-17
Teaches valuable morals... has great twists... a little to much romance, but overall you have to see it... great actions scenes, and strong well direct movie.
9/10
27.12.2007 -
tony_armiento@ - age: 13-17
This movie wasn't that great. It's always the same thing. Mary Jane always get into trouble. And the only thing new was the enemies. They were great. But overall I felt like it was the same like the rest of other spider-man movies. Not that great.
5/10
17.12.2007 -
gamesmart09@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
Ya I know I'm not even 13 so you might be thinking y am I reading this lol but anyways the movie was good I love spider-man the problem was that it was getting to long and they were squeezing everything into one movie where instead they just could've waited for the sequel to do some of the plots and the ending wasn't good at all!
6/10
3.12.2007 -
rspaddi@ - age: 1-12
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
No resolution between Peter and Mary Jane, a major character is killed off with no need to really do so and Sandmans story is left wide open as well. All in all the movie drags on and on. But can we expect better from the director of Army of Darkness?
1/10
13.11.2007 -
scrappydappydoo22@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
One of the best movies of the year 2007 also transformers but who cares it's the best Spider-Man movie yet. Spider-Man 1 was good too but SPIDER MAN 2 IS SO BAD. Venom did a awesome job, Sandman did too. I think Spider-Man 4 is coming soon I liked the part when Peter was shaking his butt!!! Harry died but I still like it. black Spider-Man was cool THE MOVIE WAS WONDERFUL action / adventure/ fun/ funny / sandy/ evil/ heroic / VENOM!!! COOL MOVIE GREAT!!!
10/10
2.11.2007 -
sheritheman@ - age: 1-12
| 
