|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 94)
|
|
 |
I wasn't impressed at all by this movie. I wanted it to be so much better than it was but it didn't stir up any feelings in me at all. The cast was not well suited for this film. Diane Lane seemed disconnected from her role and the rest of the cast looked as if they were simply going through the motions. Not a bad rental but hardly worthy of the Big Screen.
6/10
18.6.2008 -
paulleslie12@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
A movie is supposed to keep you entertained and into the plot... this movie accomplishes that and more... it's a thriller worth watching.
8/10
19.5.2008 -
isles99@ - age: 26-35
I thought this movie was a great picture & enjoyed every minute of it. A really good thriller, Diana Lane was superb in her acting role.
8/10
18.5.2008 -
jtdtg@
| | | | |
In all honesty I thought this movie was a great suspense thriller, that kept my stomach in knots throughout the entire picture, but I enjoyed every minute of it. It is similar in style to "Silence of The Lambs" and "Seven" and there is even a hint of the "Saw movies" that's blended into the recipe too. I found this film's concept a curious and frightening one, that a cyber predator could gain so much power from just using a personal home computer to carry out a plan so heinous, thus using it as a death trap to lure innocent victims, and in turn, benefiting from this for his own sick purposes. I thought the actor who played the evil genius did a believable and amazing job. Also, what I liked about this movie was that it didn't drag, it was fast paced, had good direction, and a well, thought out plot. The dark, and gritty scenes seemed to fit the mood, and there was a sense of dread and foreboding at every turn. Be forewarned, there are some very intense moments that may be disturbing to some, with imagery that is so extremely graphic, that it may turn some stomachs. I must also commend Diane Lane for her superb acting role. Overall," Untraceable" delivers a shocking punch that is both entertaining and thought-provoking to the viewer's eye. Lots of exciting action to be had in this one. Worth a look to be sure.
9/10
5.4.2008 -
crisperguy33@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Now this was a good movie!
9/10
14.3.2008 -
foley_av@ - age: 50+
Worst movie I have ever seen. Do not even think about watching this movie. It just goes on and on, the producers try 2 make it suspenseful but they will never make it anymore crappier than it already is. I do not suggest this movie 2 anyone.
1/10
5.3.2008 -
lovemaddz@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I would have rated the movie higher, maybe even upwards of an 8 or 9; good story, good suspense and all that... BUT, they had to go and kill a kitty as the opening torture scene. A KITTY. Not a cat, a cute little kitten. Then the killer tries to seem "human" by refusing to harm a little girl ("You guys didn't think I would Hurt the girl, did you? ") Perhaps the director/writer already forgot that the killer tortured a KITTEN!!!
2/10
25.2.2008 -
awr007@ - age: 18-25
Decent flick a little boring at times. I would wait until it was on dvd, but not a waste of money if you see it in theatres. Could have done alot more with this concept.
7/10
24.2.2008 -
sjekic@ - age: 18-25
Great suspense, a bit gory in parts but by no means as bad as your Saw type of movies.
8/10
24.2.2008 -
adanac66@ - age: 36-49
A little graphic in parts, but a good thriller.
7/10
21.2.2008 -
juliefoster8@ - age: 26-35
I think this movie should be rated much higher. It's a really good, contemporary suspense. It kept me on the edge of my seat until the end. I thought the idea was really original. Great movie!!!
9/10
21.2.2008 -
doumy99@ - age: 18-25
|
