 |
 |  |  |
|
9 user reviews
|
|
 |
         5.1/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: |
| Age: |
1-12 |
13-17 |
18-25 |
26-35 |
36-49 |
50+ |
Total |
Men:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
-
0 |
8
2 |
1
1 |
6
2 |
5.2
6 |
Women:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
4.5
2 |
-
0 |
6
1 |
-
0 |
5
3 |
Total:
Votes: |
-
0 |
-
0 |
4.5
2 |
8
2 |
3.5
2 |
6
2 |
5.1
9 |
|
Total includes also voters who didn't specify their sex. |
|
|
|  |  |  |
 |  |  |
|
Showing all 9 reviews...
|
|
 |
A good movie with some slow moments and some predictable moments but the ending... WOW. I like the interaction, finally, between Terry and Gabe. Agent Hillary was very good but the Police lieutenant (Ian Tracey) was obviously there for Canadian content ;)
7/10 14.5.2007 -
hexarmcpentax@ - age: 50+
| |  | | |
Why am I so hard on Canadian Movies? Peter Krause in no way caused me to emotionally revisit the terrifying event that precipitated this film. Canadian actress Kari Matchett, however, established herself as a serious contender for Laura Linney's 'World's Most Beautiful Dimples' title.
5/10 9.5.2007 -
m,j,brown@ - age: 50+
| |  | | |
All I can say is that this is a really really bad movie. I was bored to tears and wanted to leave haft way into it. The plot was just so bad.
2/10 6.5.2007 -
marianguyen_huong@ - age: 18-25
Sick minded movie, don't waste your money.
1/10 6.5.2007 -
albazz@ - age: 36-49
A really solid film with great performances. Some inspired visuals and a satisfying ending. Overall, a nice suprise considering it took 6 years to make an honest post-911 thriller on the subject of fear as social disease. Check it out.
8/10 5.5.2007 -
trottierpascal@ - age: 26-35
If you want to see how paranoid someone can get, go and see this movie.
8/10 4.5.2007 -
jnormandojr@ - age: 26-35
Movie brings back 911 and makes everyone like Rangers and suspicious. Like the competition 'Next' movie~ Boring! Drop this subject... Holywood!
2/10 4.5.2007 -
indimontreal@
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.] For most of it I thought it was a little slow and predictable. Crazy camera movements were a little annoying. The last 20 minutes was increasingly rivetting, but I was disappointed with the ending. Without giving away the plot, if they had ended it at a certain point (just five minutes earlier), it would have been a better story. But they added on an epilogue that copped out and played to the typical American slant.
6/10 1.5.2007 -
llittle@ - age: 36-49
I went to this movie, thinking it was going to be some propoganda piece, but I was pleasantly surprised. It is thought provoking. One fight between Peter Krause and Khaled Abol Naga is especially good because it dares to question the history of American foreign policy. I am glad Hollywood allowed this film to be made. I think it has the potential to really make people think.
7/10 1.5.2007 -
islam,farah@ - age: 18-25
|
|  |  |  |
| Note: Reviews posted on this page are personal opinions expressed by our visitors. We are not responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
 |