|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 97)
|
|
 |
Is this what Hollywood has resorted to? I thought there were studio people who got paid a lot of money to decide what would be a good movie to make and what would be a bad idea. Apparently its just a monkey randomly picking scripts and actors (Lindsay Lohan? Really?!? ) That sums up my review on this.
4/10
20.8.2009 -
casserly5@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
The reviews were so bad that I had to see for myself what it took for Lohan to win a Razzie award for her terrible acting. This film actually set a record for the most razzie awards with 8 in total. The worse part of this movie was that once you found out who the killer is, you're left wondering what his motivation is to begin with. There are so many holes in the plot that I couldn't find any saving qualities at all for this one. I did have very low expectations going in so at least Lohan stayed true to form.
4/10
8.6.2008 -
paulleslie12@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
This movie is pretty good but has lots of swearing. [...]
5/10
31.1.2008 -
samshafiee@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
Ok, lindsey Lohan changed but, this film is ok. It has dirty scenes and that made me kind of disappointed. Its and okay movie, but you could live without it. Lol. BUT THE DAD IS ONE SEXY MANNN :P.
6/10
17.1.2008 -
xo-babygreek-ox@ - age: 13-17
Not a bad movie... Just bad writing... With a good idea... Just taken in the completely wrong direction... Put in the wrong director's hands...
6/10
2.12.2007 -
bitemepearl@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This movie totally had potential - some scenes were very abstract, almost pulp fiction-like. Unfortunately, I think the directors tried a little TOO hard to make it into something artsy and profound when they should have focused on the many other important factors that go into making a great movie. I don't have a problem with Lohan... but her acting did suck. The pole dancing wasn't anything better than her music videos and the plot was very predictable. Worth seeing if you're bored and looking for something to do, but not worth setting time aside for.
5/10
30.11.2007 -
scleona@ - age: 18-25
It was a great movie... Lindsay Lohan can be a great actress she just needs to clean up her act.
10/10
27.11.2007 -
coryj1978@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
Well Lohan is probably going to be known as yet another actress (and I use that term lightly) who is better suited for trampy parts than for serious acting abilities. What a bomb this movie was and most of us could care less about the possibility of seeing "some skin" for an actress like Lohan. This movie went in far too many directions, very few of them plausible and if I had died at the theater while watching this piece-o-garbage, then I TOO would have known who killed ME! It's not even worth a rental I might add. Maybe the next time Lohan's pulled over for something (again), she should act in another movie, might be better than all this when she's supposedly straight?
2/10
2.9.2007 -
eraceya@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Brutal... We walked out... First movie i've walked out on since BATS... Way to go Lindsay!!
1/10
31.8.2007 -
hayner8@ - age: 26-35
One of the worse movie of this year. My girlfriend wanted to see, I knew it would be a bad idea... It was.
1/10
16.8.2007 -
dr_chester@ - age: 18-25
Talk about awful... Yikes! Maybe Lindsay Lohan is so screwed up these days cause she takes on movies and scripts like this one. I was ready for rehab after this trash! Don't go!!
2/10
11.8.2007 -
bdalz@ - age: 50+
This is truly one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It was almost impossible to sit threw and if my boyfriend hadn't of paid for me, I would have walked out! I DO NOT recommend whatsoever.
1/10
9.8.2007 -
auggie02@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
A weird attempt at a mix of torture porn and mystery, I Know Who Killed Me ends up being completely ludicrous on all levels. You don't hear the term 'overplotted' much but it's certainly the case here. They try to make this intricate plot that is supposed to keep you guessing throughout the movie as to what's going on, but it so stupid and overdone that you'll either figure out the reveal very early into the picture (I know who the killer was very early) or you'll just give up trying to figure out what's going on and when they tell you, you wanna throw your popcorn at the screen. This is easily the worst movie I've seen all year so far. The climax is stunningly stupid. There are two reasons that one would want to see this movie (I'm speaking for myself here): 1. You are a horror/thriller junkie and your bloodlust knows no bounds. For this person, they will be mostly disappointed. There is one good gory scene that serves up something not yet seen in a horror movie. That's always good and fresh but one gory scene does not make a good movie. 2. Lindsay Lohan is a stripper so you want to see this for the same reason you saw Demi Moore in Striptease or Natalie Portman in Closer. In Striptease, you get to see Demi Moore's boobs. In Closer, you get to see Portman scantily clad, talkin' sexy and you also get a great movie. But in this movie, you can neither benefit. I think I MAY have seen a nipple shot once or two but I think it was more me wanting to see it than actually seeing it. I'm amazed that Band of Brothers' Neal McDonough and Sabrina's Julia Ormond are in this piece of trash. Those are two actors that I REALLY like and it's sad to see them drown in this. Absolutely terrible and to be avoided.
1/10
9.8.2007 -
patrick,sullivan@ - age: 26-35
| | | | |
I didn't think it was bad at all, I'm a suspense-horror movie junkie and I wanted to see it. It didn't disappointed me. It has a very old horror movie feel, it doesn't have tons of blood and guts like most movies these days, which definitely ranks this movie higher then the new horror... It was original, and has lots of good twists. I think Lindsay had a good performance. You could wait to watch it on video, worth renting.
7/10
9.8.2007 -
vivala_woman@ - age: 18-25
This movie is full of plot holes the size of a basketball. I found it very difficult to sit through the extreme level of violence. Most people will be able to figure out the ending by paying attention but alas it won't be worth the effort.
2/10
8.8.2007 -
drmylesus@ - age: 36-49
I know who killed me was an alright movie the acting was good but the story line could have been better, theres alot of gruesome parts ppl were getting up and leaving during the bloody parts , you really have to pay attention to understand the story, the ending was kind of cut off but it all still made sense , I just wish there was more detail in the movie but I would watch it again also Lindsay Lohan is half naked half the movie.
7/10
8.8.2007 -
jaydensmommy02@ - age: 18-25
I didn't like this movie at all. It was increasingly unrealistic as the show progressed. BIG disappointment!
2/10
8.8.2007 -
andrewandtrina@ - age: 26-35
I saw this movie opening night and I had some high hopes for it, usually I'm turned off by Lohans acting, ( I find it over the top fake but thats besides the point), but I figured I would give her a shot. Although I wasn't let down by her acting, I find she did a far better job than in most of her movies, I thought the story line was poorly put together and the director didn't know what he was doing. This movie, could've have shouldve been better. The ideas were there, but not enough good directing to support. I will never watch this film again.
2/10
8.8.2007 -
coreycrosby@ - age: 18-25
It's an ok movie, you really need to pay attention. A little to gory. Good story line would have liked there to be more about the killer.
6/10
8.8.2007 -
tiger_4_4@ - age: 18-25
Personally, I didn't think it was that bad of a movie. The story was really good and well directed and the acting was good. The only problem I had was how complicated the main character was. Even at the end of this, I didn't understand who she was. But this might have been one of the best horror film to come out of hollywood this year.
7/10
8.8.2007 -
dx4ever_2002@ - age: 26-35
This was sooo bad and I would not even tell people that it was playing or was even made.
1/10
7.8.2007 -
jworth17@ - age: 18-25
It was OK, but drawn out... One of those movies that should have lasted half the time it did, and I didn't like the ending, it could have been a much better ending.
5/10
7.8.2007 -
cj_peachy_14@ - age: 18-25
Not bad, typical non imaginative ending. Go see when fees are cheap.
6/10
7.8.2007 -
gatera9@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
This movie wasn't THAT bad. The idea was okay and had potential, but the director wasn't cut out for it. I believe it could have been an excellent thriller had there been someone else directing it, but it turns out as a bad horror movie... Too bad! Lindsay Lohan was good in it, as the victim. Would't pay for it at the cinema, maybe you should rent this instead... Or wait for it to be shown on Tv.
6/10
7.8.2007 -
simplyk4t@ - age: 18-25
It was the stupidest movie in the history of stupid movies... Especially because the drug addict Lindsay was in there.
1/10
6.8.2007 -
mztrubble@ - age: 26-35
The movie had a good "idea" to it, but all the acting was horrible. Lindsay Lohan as a stripper seemed pretty accurate. NOT a good movie.
5/10
6.8.2007 -
leah005@ - age: 18-25
This movie is excellent so who ever has time go watch it just to tell you I went on the site and it is not 18a it is restricted but it should only be like 14a because the killer didn't know what he was doing and its really not that nasty so watch it.
9/10
6.8.2007 -
lil_car_47@ - age: 18-25
It was confusing, it was messing with your head.
6/10
5.8.2007 -
super_trucker46@ - age: 26-35
I thought it was good and worth seeing because it would show two different people sharing the same world through different eyes.
7/10
5.8.2007 -
katie_max32@ - age: 13-17
Good movie , its really scary I recommend the movie for adults, the story is neat, the acting is great go and see it.
8/10
4.8.2007 -
lalincastillo@ - age: 13-17
This movie is absolutely horrible, DO NOT SEE IT EVER! It has no point, and it ends as stupid as it begins. The best part is... Wait there isnt one! Seriously, Lindsay Lohan career just died right there. I hated it so much. The killer, oh my god, pointless and retarded.
1/10
4.8.2007 -
cookie-dough-xx@ - age: 13-17
Just one word, horrible!!! Do not waste your time and go see it!
1/10
4.8.2007 -
d3ed3e91@ - age: 13-17
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Ha. This is the worst movie ever lol zero outta a hundred stars lol lets just say when the movie was over everyone in the theatres was laughing and all I herd on the way back to the car was "that was a horrible movie".. 18 A? Cause theres a scene were they show a boob lol.. this brought lyndsay down to a whole new level.. shes trashy and ugly in this movie... And at one point the movie looked home made. No plot.. the killer is weak and has no motive for being the killer and they don't explain anything at the end... I can go on for another paragraph on how bad this movie is... Reputations are ruined from this movie.. and it's not gory at all... It looks fake!
1/10
3.8.2007 -
automatic_flowers44@ - age: 13-17
This movie is just an excuse for Lohan to shake her booty, it's an X rated version of parent trap.
4/10
3.8.2007 -
naween,xo@ - age: 13-17
This movie was awful!!! I hated it, it was long and not well acted!
1/10
3.8.2007 -
juliann_bisessar@ - age: 18-25
I really like this movie. The story was good. Yes it was unbelievable, but it was good and it make me scare.
7/10
3.8.2007 -
k2luna_pay@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Really good movie, I think this movie deserves a chance. The pole dancing scenes are incredible! Excellent performances, especially julie Ormond who is very intense. Go see it!
9/10
3.8.2007 -
jacquespedro@ - age: 18-25
Acting was awful... Storyline was unbelievable. Just an awful movie in general... TOTAL DISAPPOINTMENT.
2/10
2.8.2007 -
missy_cornell@ - age: 18-25
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This movie is definitely not worth seeing. I didn't think the acting was terrible but not much could have saved this movie. The ending was a total cop out and I am not sure why they made the killer someone that you see for 1 minute of the movie - no motive, etc.
2/10
2.8.2007 -
shanmc@ - age: 26-35
This movie had a very good plot... But they killed the ending. They could have made this movie a very good original thriller... And Lindsey not a very good candidate for this movie, her acting was very bad...
5/10
2.8.2007 -
vanilla_debby@ - age: 18-25
It starts off to a confusing scene's then quick goes very bad! Nothing made sense! And everything could of been thought out better. The acting was horrible. And tops it off with the worst ending it rated so high but it has a 5 year old ending.
2/10
2.8.2007 -
xo_13_ox@ - age: 13-17
The worst movie ever!!! And Lindsay is definitely the worst actress ever!!!
1/10
1.8.2007 -
margarittka@ - age: 18-25
This movie sucked... The acting was horrible and the ending could have been MUCH better!
1/10
1.8.2007 -
danie_14@ - age: 18-25
Sorry, Didn't like it one bit. I wouldn't pay 3$ to rent it either.
3/10
1.8.2007 -
uniden24ghz@ - age: 26-35
This movie was a bit odd. The story line itself was an okay idea but the film just wasn't that great. It seemed like it should have been made as an experimental or art film instead of a blockbuster, simply b/c of the way it was filmed, editing, art motives, etc.
5/10
1.8.2007 -
carry123@ - age: 18-25
Terribly poor. Terrible script and acting. Lindsay would do better with a re-make of "Days of Wine and Roses" at this stage of her life. At best, wait and use a $2 off coupon at blockbuster in three months for this one. Seriously... That's all it's worth. Garbage with a capital "G"
1/10
1.8.2007 -
dalz@ - age: 36-49
I thought this might be the turn-around movie for Lohan but not so. Not worth it!
4/10
1.8.2007 -
beebe101@ - age: 18-25
The movie was good until the last 15 mins which honestly ruined the entire movie... Definitely not worth seeing!!!
3/10
1.8.2007 -
qt_jess18@ - age: 18-25
I am a huge Lindsay Lohan Fan, however - Do not go watch this movie. It was absolutely horrible and boring. The gory scenes were unnecessary and stupid... This movie should not be categorized as a "horror" flick, it actually should be a comedy! The plot line sucked, and was VERY unrealistic. Overall this movie was a joke... Waste of money and time...
1/10
1.8.2007 -
bellamfss@ - age: 18-25
| 
