|
Showing reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 950)
|
|
 |
It's pretty good, But they should have put less villains and I would of liked to see more Venom and the guy who played Venom was ok. Overall it was a good movie.
8/10
2.7.2009 -
jlesh@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
A little bit of a let down in comparison to the original 2 but Sandman and Venom are fantastic villains and the whole Spiderman and Harry teaming up to save M. J. was cool about time they rapped up that whole Harry thinking Peter killed his father thing it was getting a little old... quickly... Oh well it's over now and the show was a little weaker than it's predecessors but none the less a strong and welcome edition to the Superhero genre highly recommended for fans of Superhero movies and action movies alike. A must see!
8/10
25.5.2009 -
ducksrule@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
This was in no way the best of the three. Sandman's scenes looked choppy and stopmotion-esque, and come on, SpiderMan dancing? I went to see it with a friend and when it ended, he turned to me and asked where Venom came from. I said "Space, but I guess they didn't explore that, to keep the story down-to-earth." His reply was "In trying to do that, they screwed it up." And I agree wholeheartedly.
3/10
6.4.2009 -
mendicantbias09@ - age: 13-17
Well Spiderman 3 was so good go Spiderman save the day.
10/10
25.2.2009 -
erickboy_5@ - age: 13-17
It seems the spiderman movies get worse there all good its just this one had to much drama.
6/10
22.10.2008 -
david_jin1998@ - age: 1-12
It was the worst spiderman film I wouldn't call it a movie I would call it a cheap imitation of another movie.
5/10
29.7.2008 -
kingconnorkk@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
It was great but for a spiderman movie it went down. It featured all the emotions but they tried to put to much into it, it could have been much better.
6/10
13.7.2008 -
richyazda42@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
This movie is awesome! Venom could have killed more people but it was still amazing!! Hope there is a number 4.
9/10
4.7.2008 -
diegoborat@ - age: 1-12
This movie made my retina's rebel against my optic nerve which cause me to experience one of the worst headaches of my life! Gremlins took over the editing of this film and that's why there's an emo tribute in the middle... OUT OF NOWHERE!! Die Spiderman die! Hang yourself with your web before you make another horrible movie.
1/10
16.6.2008 -
glendapassmore@ - age: 18-25
This movie has good morality stuff. I did not watch it at the cinema but I did at home. So, there is good action on it, which is I like to see/watch , and overall, it is nice movie and I think you will enjoy watching it.
8/10
11.6.2008 -
henyland_lake03@ - age: 18-25
| | | | |
Spider-man 3 is very disappointing. Raimi did so well with the first two. But look at this crap, it deserves no awards. It has one really good scene, which I will not identify, but every other scene was either off, cheesy, bizarre, over the top, weak, or just simply bad or stupid. But what was very disappointing was the action, which was taken way too far. In an action scene, the camera movement was head aching to watch, and they had overused the capability of CGI. 98% of every image of spider-man was CGI, unlike the first two. Venom was completely computer generated. Same with Sandman, also for Harry, or Goblin Jr. Also, don’t see it in the IMAX; it is hard enough to watch it in a regular theatre. I don’t know why but I found it very boring in the IMAX. I didn’t like the ending either, as they continue to dwell over Ben’s death which was 2 and a half years ago. So why are they wrecking characters and the whole series? Some may not see as many flaws as I did, but what personally it sucked really badly.
4/10
21.5.2008 -
n,oved@ - age: 13-17
| | | | |
The best movie but a little to complicated don't take your 6 year old but you can totally take a 7 year old!!!
7/10
4.5.2008 -
wish_me_love_me@ - age: 1-12
Spiderman 3 is a great movie but a little expensive so I hope the next spiderman movie will cost about $15. I hope that there will be spiderman 4 text year with the lizird and carnage as spidermans foes.
8/10
27.4.2008 -
r2mk@ - age: 1-12
Let's just say I was expecting more. The visual effects are amazing though.
8/10
1.3.2008 -
ronnielib@ - age: 36-49
It is a great movie you should see it so good. ! WOW! Please do not miss it!
8/10
13.2.2008 -
celine-shomali@ - age: 1-12
I guess it is what is expected for number 3 in the series. More of a money grab, with most of the effort spent on advertising. I was very disappointed in Toby’s horrible acting. He was drastically over paid. A very surfacey actor, and wont be surprised if he is now typecast. Parts of the movie requiring him to expand his roll, he just couldn’t pull it off. Kirsten does much better, I just wish we didn’t ask her to sing, it’s horrible. Or is that the point and her great acting? That MJ is a mediocre singer? Oh well, I hope Kirsten makes it through rehab okay. She just went in.
6/10
12.2.2008 -
clifforda@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
Was looking forward to it for months and walked away terribly dissapointed. The whole movie went off the rails with P. Parker going all Emo.
5/10
9.2.2008 -
hopkinson,todd@ - age: 26-35
I thought it was juss as good as spiderman 1 and 2, go watch it now!
8/10
3.1.2008 -
hidollgirl@ - age: 13-17
Teaches valuable morals... has great twists... a little to much romance, but overall you have to see it... great actions scenes, and strong well direct movie.
9/10
27.12.2007 -
tony_armiento@ - age: 13-17
This movie wasn't that great. It's always the same thing. Mary Jane always get into trouble. And the only thing new was the enemies. They were great. But overall I felt like it was the same like the rest of other spider-man movies. Not that great.
5/10
17.12.2007 -
gamesmart09@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
Ya I know I'm not even 13 so you might be thinking y am I reading this lol but anyways the movie was good I love spider-man the problem was that it was getting to long and they were squeezing everything into one movie where instead they just could've waited for the sequel to do some of the plots and the ending wasn't good at all!
6/10
3.12.2007 -
rspaddi@ - age: 1-12
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
No resolution between Peter and Mary Jane, a major character is killed off with no need to really do so and Sandmans story is left wide open as well. All in all the movie drags on and on. But can we expect better from the director of Army of Darkness?
1/10
13.11.2007 -
scrappydappydoo22@ - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
One of the best movies of the year 2007 also transformers but who cares it's the best Spider-Man movie yet. Spider-Man 1 was good too but SPIDER MAN 2 IS SO BAD. Venom did a awesome job, Sandman did too. I think Spider-Man 4 is coming soon I liked the part when Peter was shaking his butt!!! Harry died but I still like it. black Spider-Man was cool THE MOVIE WAS WONDERFUL action / adventure/ fun/ funny / sandy/ evil/ heroic / VENOM!!! COOL MOVIE GREAT!!!
10/10
2.11.2007 -
sheritheman@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
DVD: "Spider-Man 3"
Go Spider-Man 3 you should watch it right now Venom is scary!!! 3 times the fun, 3 times the action, 3 times the villeins, 3 times the Venom!!! It's a 1# movie.
10/10
2.11.2007 -
shahrez123@ - age: 1-12
DVD: "Spider-Man 3"
I love spider-man3 it was the best of spidersmans movies.
10/10
29.10.2007 -
geffbrown@ - age: 36-49
Cool super cool même à voir.
9/10
27.10.2007 -
manonlajeunesse@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
Great movie, special effects great, almost seemed like the story was rushed, all in all a great movie.
8/10
16.9.2007 -
chumguy@ - age: 36-49
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This movie was fast paced. The Peter Parker dance moves along the sidewalk left me a thinking the director had lost his mind but aside from that I enjoyed this movie. I really would have liked it if it had been made as two movies instead of all crammed into one.
8/10
15.9.2007 -
sharhowe@ - age: 36-49
This is the worst Spider-Man movie I have ever seen. The villans know who Spider-Man is and Parker's scene at the Jazz Club is awful. The story does not live up to what Spider-Man is supposed to be. Thumbs way down.
1/10
4.9.2007 -
metalandy2000@ - age: 36-49
Too much squeezed into to little time I felt I was constantly being bombarded by senseless plot points that seem to go nowhere.
5/10
3.9.2007 -
dean2069@ - age: 36-49
This was a great film! True to the comics. And as a long-time comics fan, I appreciated this. Lots of action, great special effects, great character moments. Although they didn't get Venom quite right, the got the rest just right. A great film. I'm down for the DVD and would love to catch the movie one more time on the big screen! Spidey rules!
10/10
24.8.2007 -
andrewsalmon2000@ - age: 36-49
This movie is sick, nice costume for venom.
9/10
21.8.2007 -
spider_man_1@ - age: 13-17
This was one action packed movie! The characters were awesome and the story line was almost identical to the comic book!
8/10
21.8.2007 -
tobidpearce@ - age: 26-35
SUCH a letdown! Such a letdown. It was so boring, that at times watching the movie seemed like a drag. Whatever happened to Spidey's scriptwriter/s? How could they have come up with such an uninvolving film? Too many villains for my taste, as a result of which it felt like they were being gushed into our throats!
2/10
20.8.2007 -
05iqbalp@ - age: 18-25
I'm not too big of a fan of romance scenes, and there was quite a bit in Spiderman 3. Now don't get me wrong, I like the movies, it's just they needed more action scenes.
6/10
19.8.2007 -
ratedredgecution@ - age: 13-17
In the series, its was the worst! I think Spider-man 2 was the best out of all, and this was was a disappointment and it could have been way better!
6/10
19.8.2007 -
nimo-23@ - age: 1-12
It was terrible, plain and simple.
1/10
18.8.2007 -
kingk@ - age: 13-17
I suggest that Spider Man should remain a unique movie which is full of exuberance, like the first and second. However, I was not surprised that it was not as good, because I had been expecting Spider Man 2 to be a let-down after the first, but when it revealed a mysterious and delusional story which expressed interesting scenes, I knew that the next would be a disaster. I'm ten years-old, and I need a superhero to make a new hit, no more sequels!
5/10
18.8.2007 -
spiderpaws@ - age: 1-12
| | | | |
I watched this movie on an airplane. All the time during the movie the Simpsons' song Spider Pig kept playing in my head. Groening must have seen Spidey 3 while he was writing his own movie. If not, he must have been psychic. S3 suffers from trying to do too much, trying to write in so many characters to action that seems pointless. Characters go away and return for no apparent reason but that the writers think the focus and not the plot has to change. There are so many silly moments that the movie almost mocks itself. If the writing were any more intelligent, then we would have SM3, the mockumentary. Witness that stupid strutting that happens in the street. No John Travolta there. Then there are the sappy moments with the villains ( nothing super about them) the movie deflates like an old worn balloon. No sense of climax here. Now, I did like the special effects. The little turbulence the airplane went through made the fights scenes like a Disney ride. SM3... SM3 does whatever a...
6/10
15.8.2007 -
raclout@ - age: 50+
This movie could have been better, to much story about Peters love life. Not enough spiderman stuff. It's a renter-when theres nothing better to watch.
6/10
11.8.2007 -
wesm@ - age: 36-49
I really enjoyed the movie. Great escapism. Lots of action, super special effects, and even a good story.
8/10
9.8.2007 -
colinbeth@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
It was a great movie worth seeing could be a little bit better.
8/10
9.8.2007 -
bulletproof-grunt@ - age: 13-17
I went to this movie with one other adult and 7 children ages 4-11. I think it is a great family film and by far the best of the Spiderman movies thus far. While the story line admittedly does not follow the comic very well, I appreciated the morals of the story and the life lessons learned. I would be willing to see this again and possible buy the DVD for my children.
8/10
8.8.2007 -
coletteconway3@ - age: 36-49
It was the best of all the superhero movies I have seen. It is a must see movie!
10/10
8.8.2007 -
treenastead@ - age: 36-49
Another Spiderman classic. Loads of action, funny moments and fantastic computer graphics. On the downside, a little too much plot for just one movie. Too many story lines to give each of them the proper attention. This easily could have been split into two movies Spiderman 3 and 4.
8/10
6.8.2007 -
kpkeep@ - age: 36-49
I am a fan of Spider Man and enjoyed Spidey 2, but this movie is just not very good - from start to finish. That's about all I have to say about it. I would definitely not hesitate recommending waiting until it is on TMN.
3/10
5.8.2007 -
r_madden@ - age: 26-35
Enjoy this action packed thriller like I did!
8/10
31.7.2007 -
hayljb@ - age: 1-12
Spiderman 3 is good. Gotta love comics.
7/10
31.7.2007 -
domina_g_i@ - age: 36-49
| | | | |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This movie is not very good like the other one, And the end of the movie its pretty suck. The movie is so racist somehow when spider-man is black he became a great dancer. WHAT?
5/10
30.7.2007 -
bart_man23@ - age: 13-17
It was pretty good, I wouldn't pay to see it again but, if someone in my house buys it I'll probably watch it... Maybe.
7/10
30.7.2007 -
tyronne_bigums@ - age: 26-35
| 
