Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    kingrocknroll@

    WARNING: This review is hidden because it reveals the content of the film.
    Click here to show this review.     Like the first installment, the production values come across as kind of cheap. The build-up to the contest I found to be actually more interesting than the last hour of this film. This time, Katniss actually has to kill someone but, OF COURSE, only in self-defense. Donald Sutherland should win an Oscar for best beard. One of the competitors looks like Kristen Stewart (this must be an inside joke) Jennifer Lawrence should have been chosen as the new Wonder Woman; not the stringbean Gal Gadot (from Fast & Furious 6).

    7
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    kingrocknroll@  16.12.2013 age: 50+ 71 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The movie review posted on this page reflects a personal opinion of one user. We are not responsible for its content.

    Did you see ''The Hunger Games: Catching Fire''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.