Log in / Sign up
I cant say much for this film it was was horrible, sure it had lots of action but at what cost? Poor CGI effects, and it was full of continuity errors, and the script was crap-o-la, complete with a so-so love intrust/element, Tim Roth as the man antagonist was just wrong, William hurts acting was well crap at best as the general border-lining on painful. Which is odd because usually he gives good performances in most of this films. I will agree that Edward Norton was OK as David Banner (He is an excellent actor and I have no complaints with him in this movie) There was a good reason nobody from the first film signed onto the 2nd cause it was a crappy sequel designed to rob you of 7 bucks! I for the life of me cannot understand why people think this movie is better than the first one. I admit fully the first film was not the best comic book adaption, but it had a stronger overall cast and a more developed story line, granted it had less "action", but it was a far superior film than this abomination of a sequel.
There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.
Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.
Your age and sex:
We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.
What do you expect?.. It's based off of a comic book!
You are talking RUBBISH I mean how was that not awesome?
Are we the only 2 people on earth who thinks this movie stinks. The first one was way better. Thanks for your honest appraisal.