Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    The Amazing Spider-Man

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    alapatyou@

    Wow I don't agree with most of the negative reviews posted. I thought Garfield was a much better (and truer) Spiderman, and there's no comparison between Stone and Dunst. The acting and chemistry between actors was much improved and of course special effects were well done. It was a little darker than the previous series... overall a fun comic book movie and a slight improvement on the 2002 version.

    8
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    alapatyou@  13.7.2012 age: 26-35 53 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The movie review posted on this page reflects a personal opinion of one user. We are not responsible for its content.

    Did you see ''The Amazing Spider-Man''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.