Every week we will give away
four pairs of free movie tickets!
The movie tickets are valid to see
any movie of your choice at any
Cineplex or Galaxy movie theatre!
Just write your own review about any
movie published on CinemaClock.com
and give it a value between 1 and 10.
The promotion is valid for Canadian residents only.
Aw, Idris baby, why'd you do it man? You're an A list actor and this is a sub-B movie. They must have paid you a lot of dosh to make something this flat and predictable. You are worthy of so much more than this. And they didn't even light you well, even if you were the bad guy. Don't put this one on your resume, sweetheart.
|5/10||hands4hearts@ - 12 reviews|
16.9.2014 - age: 50+
I enjoyed this movie immensely. Shows how fine art is to some degree smoke and mirrors. I'm a professional artist and found it very interesting. Good going Tim.
|9/10||sculpts@ - 23 reviews|
27.4.2014 - age: 50+
You will feel as though you yourself are the occupied...
|10/10||platinumcritic99@ - 26 reviews|
7.9.2014 - age: 36-49
Excellent movie! It is fun filled and full of laughs. I watched this the day the movie came out. There hasn't been a movie with the same fun feel for the past 10 years. I highly recommend this movie to everyone.
|10/10||riskpack@ - 22 reviews|
7.9.2014 - age: 18-25
All movies ask the viewer to suspend disbelief. But Pacific Rim abuses that entreaty by offering such ridiculous offal that no person with intelligence beyond the average young child's could possibly get through this without several shakes of the head. Other than one of the most ludicrous plots in cinema history, the movie is OK. Acting is at an expected level for this sort of oeuvre (but bad nerds) Production values are high enough. Action is good enough. And a nice throwback to the genre's origins is shown with the creature animation. I did watch to the end, though. But the plot? Seriously, if the lava flows don't melt it, the rocket's red glare won't either.
|3/10||spoxox@ - 31 reviews|
6.9.2014 - age: 50+
A NICE movie. Formulaic. Predictable. Sweet. Very handsome young male lead. Etc., etc... Not riveting for me; found my attention wandering as I could predict (accurately as it turned out) the end. Not a complete waste of time though as nice, sweet movies can be enjoyable too, on occasion!
|6/10||j_ashlie@ - 26 reviews|
4.9.2014 - age: 50+
This is a movie I would (and did) see with family. It's hard-hitting and heart-felt, with very distinctive characters and wonderful morals and story line. I took my husband and he loved it, then took my sister (husband said it was just because I wanted to see it twice; I told him it was also a good excuse to see my sister) and she loved it, AND we told my husband's grandparents about it and THEY saw it and loved it. They came back and he was rubbing his arm because she bruised it with her enthusiasm, but they both loved it despite the age difference between us and even though we don't like the same things most of the time. I tried to send my dad to see it, as I know he'd like it, my mom would probably like it, my grandparents would love it, and I've been recommending it to people at work as well. This movie is based on real events, the people who came together and made the movie all had things in common and some of that shows on screen, and... This is a movie I will buy. Not might, WILL. And probably will buy other copies for other relatives so they can enjoy it, too. Because this movie is too good not to share.
|10/10||wolf.kin.flight@ - first review|
29.8.2014 - age: 18-25
From the demented mind of Frank Miller, this stylized, no-holds-barred, sex and violence-soaked film is a worthy follow-up to the original classic. Eva Green steals every scene she is in, in her portrayal as the sultry, evil seductress. The 3D effects are powerfully rendered, even though this is hard to achieve with a mostly black & white movie which, in my opinion, is the best motion picture released so far this year.
|10/10||chester1958@ - 26 reviews|
22.8.2014 - age: 50+
This old man also enjoyed watching some of my old fabulous actors but I especially enjoyed seeing Mel Gibson at his best being a villain and/or should I say a bad guy of America... I hear YA folks, Mel was not playing a Brave Heart but then again, that part was also no passion of well YA know WHO?.. Go figure? I'm sure that his fans will forgive him for the part that he took after going through a 250 Mill die voice bill... Come on fans, look at the bright side, not every country loves America these days... WHAT! WHAT! WHAT? LOL :) Peace.
|8/10||victorsavard@ - 26 reviews|
30.8.2014 - age: 50+
I loved TMNT as a child... And I still love them now! Story could have been a little cleaner. Disappointed that the writers did not do justice to April's character nor to Splinter's. You just can't learn to be Asian by reading a book! Graphics were great and filled with non stop action but what I would have enjoyed is to have spent MORE time getting reacquainted with each turtle! Everything just seemed so rushed! However even with all its shortcomings I'll still be buying this movie for collection. Last note, I love that they showcased Mikey on his skateboard going through the sewer!!
|8/10||threestarssun@ - 26 reviews|
13.8.2014 - age: 26-35
If I could give this movie a 10+, I would, so a BIG Fat 10 for this wonderful movie! I went to every James Brown concert as a teenager growing up in the New York area! I feel blessed to have experienced the magic of being there! What an incredible Music, Genius and Complex person, Mr. James Brown was and will always be! His band set the stage on FIRE! I continued to attend his concerts right up to The God Father of Soul's exit to 'The Other Side'. He is happy! Putting my coins together to see this moving important work of High Art again and again!
|10/10||d_silverknight@ - first review|
21.8.2014 - age: 50+
As I saw the original french version, at first, I was a little worried to be disappointed as the original version was such a masterpiece of finesse and "humor à la française" with the greatest Quebec cast of actors ( Raymond Bouchard (the mayor), Benoît Brière (the banking manager), Rita Lafontaine (the mayor's wife), David Boutin ( the doctor), Pierre Collin ( the mayor's best friend), Lucie Laurier ( the young doctor's flirt) But this time, the story is taking place in a little harbor in Newfoundland. As in the original version, the photography well captures the beauty of the landscapes of the coast of NF. Further on, we are laughing all along as the story developed. I did not know most of the cast except the great Gordon Pinsent. His character is hilarious and credible as this old fisherman and the mayor's complice. And as a big fan of "This Hour has 22 minutes", I rediscovered Mark Critch, Mary Wlash and Cathy Jones who are hilarious too and well casted in their role. Finally I discovered Brendan Gleeson and Taylor Kitsch whose relationship in the film is the pillar of the whole story.
|7/10||marie_josee456@ - 22 reviews|
1.6.2014 - age: 50+
Ok I don't understand all those bad reviews... I loved it the acting was good, the actions were very good! Pretty good movie.
|10/10||acoriano_marc92@ - 23 reviews|
10.8.2014 - age: 18-25
I was very disappointed by this movie, I just expect more from Woody Allen. Colin Firth and Emma Stone performed okay considering what they had been given though I'm doubt this movie did much for their careers. Great costumes at least.
|5/10||hatros@ - 27 reviews|
13.8.2014 - age: 50+
A moving story about self discovery a major life choice. It is set in gloomy, probably Communist Poland. Ida is an emotional story of a young, innocent woman. She learns from her aunt who she is and why she grew up in a convent. She experiences life outside the convent and has to decide if she wants to become a nun.
|7/10||daylekarsha55@ - first review|
16.8.2014 - age: 50+
The most over rated film of 2013. With such great actors and a great sound track, it would have been complete with a more interesting story line. Way too monotonous. I just kept waiting and waiting for something to happen.
|5/10||katboguski@ - 37 reviews|
5.1.2014 - age: 36-49
One of the top movies from Disney imo. Great soundtrack, beautiful animation and excellent storyline. Compared to Pixar's "Planes" kids in the theater room were hypnotize at what they were seeing vs a "is it done yet" attitude. Great Job! Recommended!
|9/10||mariezd@ - 24 reviews|
17.12.2013 - age: 36-49
I would have given it a 1, but I wasn't sure if it was the worst movie I ever saw, so I gave it a 2. The only reason to see this 3 hour waste of time is if you want to see the concept of a movie that took 12 years to make and physically see the actual aging of the characters in real time and life. Otherwise a complete waste of time.
|2/10||jeffk29@ - 29 reviews|
7.8.2014 - age: 36-49
Loved the music, storyline interesting, good choice of actors including more of Adam Levine. Could do without the foul language - just not necessary.
|8/10||dvissing@ - first review|
4.7.2014 - age: 50+
The only reason I don't give this film the lowest possible rating is so that anyone interested in fashion goes to see this and realizes what shallow, witless, uninteresting, unintelligent, and snarky people work in fashion and at Vogue in particular. One would expect those who work in the upper echelons of the style-making industry would be intelligent, witty or even interesting but I have never had to suffer a more shallow, boring, nasty group of individuals on film: they whine and snipe and pose and pout, petulantly believing that the world is failing to recognize what they consider to be their obvious creative genius. Forget it. What talent is evident here (mostly that of stylist Grace Coddington) is overshadowed by their miserable, self-absorbed sense of self-importance. The best thing I can say about this documentary is that it convinced me to never again waste my time or money on an issue of Vogue.
|5/10||land@ - 19 reviews|
7.8.2014 - age: 36-49
It's a pretty good movie. I'm not sure if it's really worth 10/10 but it's a Canadian film which is a good enough reason to go watch it. So just go. Now.
|10/10||alexandre.pelletier@ - first review|
11.8.2014 - age: 18-25
Just a fun movie. Right up there with The Avengers. If you want to be entertained then just sit back and enjoy... it is entertaining! I'm glad I went.
|9/10||mjhietanen@ - 33 reviews|
7.8.2014 - age: 36-49
Very hit and miss with the laughs. A lot of awkward parts that I assumed were supposed to be funny but they just didn't quite pull it off. On a positive note, it was slightly better than hangover 3! :)
|5/10||gentspreferblondes@ - first review|
19.5.2014 - age: 26-35
Great movie!! Scarlett Johansson is great in this role!! Interesting movie, different from the usual movies out there. Keeps you locked in to see what's next... enjoy!!! A must see!!!
|9/10||silly@ - 23 reviews|
27.7.2014 - age: 36-49
I was not expecting much from this movie, and yet I came away extremly disapointed. I thought it might about the adventures of Hercules, but instead they only allude to his trials. What were they thinking. There is so much story in these trials they could be a series of movies, but for some reason they completely dissmiss them and use something new. The script was bad, acting mediocre at best, the plot felt tacked on as a means to get from one fight scene to the next. Never really cared for the rock. I don't really find him to be a good actor, nor do I think he is all the charsmatic or charming. Casting even went out of their way to make everyone sound british... Except the Rock. I found it distracting whenever he said anything. I do not recomend this to anyone.
|3/10||jarshdarsh@ - 27 reviews|
31.7.2014 - age: 26-35
Godzilla is a wonderful and thrilling throwback to classic monster movies, like Jaws and Jurassic Park. Yes, you have to actually wait a little while for Godzilla to show up, this isn't a modern, cranked up to 11, action packed explosion-fest. This is a carefully crafted story setting up these monsters so that the finale will be that much more exciting. I personally enjoyed the movie thoroughly and loved having my anticipation built up. The ending is so worth the wait and while the human element isn't the best part of the movie, it rarely is in these kinds of films. It was great that nearly every twist and surprise wasn't revealed in the trailer, so expect some genuine gasps when this movie unfolds. This a great movie for those who enjoy creature features and I highly recommend it.
|8/10||bradchase@ - 25 reviews|
27.5.2014 - age: 26-35
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It started out looking pretty promising what with the ape culture and different personalities in the ape city. Enter the humans, on a mission to restore the power dam. Human are depticted as laughably predictable stereotypes -- good human, bad human! You can tell who the bad humans are, they have long hair or don't shave enough and look kind of smelly. Also, they think apes are dumb animals. But wait! There are 'bad' apes, too so between the bad apes and the bad humans war is inevitable. The 'war' was a little confusing for a while, like who is winning here but don't worry, the music will tell you how to feel. Yes, the score. At every possible opportunity, the score was either very, very moving, or very, very ominous or well, just very, very whatever you the viewer are supposed to be feeling about all this just in case you weren't sure. This sound track re-defined intrusive. During the big battle scene the 'bad' ape actually rides a horse full tilt with a gun in each ala John Wayne in True Grit-- I nearly laughed out loud. The action (when not being interrupted by touching scenes of how nice and family oriented apes are) and clichés, are non-stop. There are a few cute moments of interaction between the 'good' humans (of course) and some of the apes, and the special effects are well done, but overall it's a waste of computer generated effects.
|6/10||dodge@ - 15 reviews|
26.7.2014 - age: 50+
You think Jaws (rated 10!) was the first "scare on the beach movie?". If the criteria is predictability, only David Lynch movies should get above 8! And if we were to sick to original screenplay idea, we would only watch movies made before 1950!
|0/10||charlfrance@ - 15 reviews|
28.7.2014 - age: 36-49
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Overall, this was a very entertaining movie. I was very pleased to see the 2 casts of X-men brought together. It's unfortunate that a few of the roles from great actors i.e. Halle Berry, Anna Paquin, Ian McKellan were diminished. Most of the focus is on the past events surrounding Wolverine, Xavier, Magneto, and Mystique. The SFX were top notch and the action and the suspense throughout was fantastic. There were some really neat action sequences, but nothing mind blowing. You essentially get what you'd expect from the X-Men series. I liked the dark post apocalyptic feel of the movie as it was a definite change for this series. The score is menacing and hopeful, at the same time. I didn't like that Xavier never explained how he survived the events of X-men The Last Stand. This is a glaring plot hole that could have easily been fixed with a quick flashback/expository scene. Please stay until the end of the credits. Might be important for the next sequel!!
|8/10||stan.bordenave@ - 30 reviews|
8.6.2014 - age: 26-35
This was one of the most touching movies I've seen in a long time. I've been a fan of Jonas Armstrong for some years now and he does not fail to disappoint, along with the young lady who played Rachel. She is someone to keep your eye on in the future. I would highly recommend this movie to everyone.
|9/10||cadey.brooke@ - first review|
16.7.2014 - age: 26-35
I enjoyed this movie a lot. The CGI is extremely good, but the plot gets cheesy at times. It is well worth seeing which I did in 3D. Characters were quite predictable (good/bad in everyone), but overall one of the better movies of its type.
|7/10||paulberner@ - 30 reviews|
15.7.2014 - age: 50+
Mais qu'est ce qu'ont tous les critiques dans les journaux avec les comparaisons entre Volcano et Amour? Je viens de voir Volcano, qui est sur la reconquête d'un amour perdu, et la redécouverte de la vie par quelqu'un qui n'en attendait plus rien. Il n'a rien de la froideur clinique du film de Haneke. On est plus proche de Bergman ici, et il faut vraiment ne pas aller chercher bien loin ou bien être aveugle aux subtilités pour s'arrêter à la comparaison entre les deux films. Oui, les deux films parlent de personnes du troisième âge, et de la maladie de l'un d'entre eux. C'est tout, fini la comparaison. Le film de Haneke est très bien, mais Volcano dégage une douceur et une tendresse que j'ai rarement vues au cinéma, et certainement pas chez Haneke. La salle était en pleurs quand le film s'est terminé, je pense que c'est une des plus belles histoires d'amour que j'ai vus au cinéma. Il y avait peu de gens dans la salle quand j'y suis allé, j'espère qu'au moins les commentaires positifs vont encourager d'autres à venir découvrir ce film. Ce serait dommage de passer à côté.
|10/10||anthonybello@ - 30 reviews|
2.10.2013 - age: 26-35
There aren't a lot of movies that I would rate highly (mostly due to major 'suspension of disbelief' or absence of decent story-line or an overabundance of CGI) but I really enjoyed this film. This version of Sleeping Beauty is sweet and amusing (except for the 3 babysitting-fairies that I found too childish/annoying) And I love the music (although I thought it was Angelina who was singing the theme song!)
|9/10||jfk@ - 7 reviews|
16.7.2014 - age: 36-49
Dinesh D'Souza's writing does point out the good in America, but he fails to provide real balance in his point of view, particularly when it comes to slavery.
|5/10||sisharonsi@ - 3 reviews|
17.7.2014 - age: 50+
I really loved this movie, the acting by the 2 leads is excellent, the scenery and the music is soo good! It's nice to see something different out there!
|9/10||francinegizmo@ - 28 reviews|
24.6.2014 - age: 50+
This is a really bad movie. Most of it looks like it was filmed with a cell phone. The story is lame (what there is of it) and it's just boring, and dumb, and stupid, and... I could go on and on, but I think you get the idea.
|3/10||audiobent.com@ - 41 reviews|
10.7.2014 - age: 50+
A light hearted comedy that was interesting but had a little to much Jon and not enough Oliver in it. Acting was good but was anyone else wondering how he got his hot wife in the first place!?!
|7/10||michjulien@ - 168 reviews|
12.7.2014 - age: 36-49
Ritesh Deshmukh did an amazing job. He should get an award for his role. Such a different role from his other movies. The story is really good I love it. Do it watch on the screen and yeah the songs are amazing too.
|9/10||faiza_bluesky@ - 25 reviews|
3.7.2014 - age: 26-35
One of those rare movies that doesn't have one boring scene. Great acting overall. Can't wait to the sequel as it battles HG for the #1 so called 'YA' film.
|9/10||tedbouchard@ - 26 reviews|
4.4.2014 - age: 36-49
What a lame movie. Bad acting, bad story line, lame one-liners. Maybe if you are a pre teen or a teenager you might find it interesting. Unless you are extremely bored and have absolutely nothing to do, then go see this [c…], otherwise your money is best spent elsewhere.
|5/10||bignj@ - 68 reviews|
2.7.2014 - age: 36-49
Being longtime fans of Hunter S. Thompson, and hungry for any new material about him and his 'sidekick' Ralph Steadman, my husband and I went to see this documentary about the man behind the crazy art that accompanied Hunter's writings. It was exciting and enlightening to see the genius of Steadman at work, step by step creating his style of art that has come to be a well-known expression of their disdain for the social and political ills of society when combined with Hunter's writings. We never understood, before this, the influence Steadman must have had on Hunter, and visa-versa. We thought Hunter was the crazy genius, but this documentary shows how they were both really meant to be together in this world. We both thought Johnny Depp's involvement was important as a friend who loved Hunter and who asked the few needed questions that revealed to us how important a person Steadman was to Hunter, and what an amazing artist and person Steadman is in his own right. His arrival in America and his first impressions of NYC were haunting and revealing of the kind of human being he is. We both recommend this documentary to anyone who loved Hunter Thompson. It really tells us an amazing and integral part of his story.
|9/10||cherthmngcher@ - first review|
25.5.2014 - age: 50+
Interesting twist - some things weren't explained and if you are familiar with the (movie) series you may feel this is somewhat of a re imagination with respect to the history (within the move series). Ok though for the most part.
|6/10||petersimard@ - 59 reviews|
1.7.2014 - age: 36-49
Light hilarious story well acted, I liked not only John Favireau's acting as the chef but also the son Emjay Anthony. Good change.
|7/10||thakurj@ - 185 reviews|
21.6.2014 - age: 50+
Amazing in every way! I am a huge fan of the first and this sequel did not disappoint!
|10/10||gen.tremblay@ - 25 reviews|
11.4.2014 - age: 26-35
Yes I saw the movie! I had no idea such a thing was permitted to happen during those times regardless of your family name and social standing. The outcome somewhat surprised me. I was looking for something bad to happen. EVERYONE!!! GO SEE THIS MOVIE!!!
|10/10||aeseb1914@ - first review|
23.6.2014 - age: 36-49
Terrible film. Tasteless. Not funny. Crude. Irritating beyond belief. Left as soon as I sensed my husband was feeling the same way. Avoid. SilverCity staff are always accommodating, and offered us passes because we did not have a good experience.
|1/10||strelitzia1@ - 28 reviews|
15.6.2014 - age: 50+
22 Jump Street is a movie that seems to take pride in the fact that it shoudn't even exist. Rarely has a sequel, particularly a comedic one, been so in love with the notion of trashing itself. From wink at the camera dialogue like "this case is EXACTLY like the last one" to a closing credit sequence showing audiences what 40 Jump Street would look like, this movie seems to get the absurdity of sequels in a way that very few films ever have. Hill and Tatum are yet again the big reason why it works as well as it does, although Ice Cube lends a big comedic hand this time. It meanders a little more than it should and the laughs aren't as plentiful nor as creative as 21. However, there are several side splitting moments and enough smug self awareness to make this a sequel that deserves a chance, even if its own writers clearly don't think so.
|7/10||jfichaud@ - 173 reviews|
18.6.2014 - age: 26-35