I just saw FURY again after teaching today and I loved it even more than I did the first time. The supporting players from Michael Pena, Shia Le Boeuf and especially Logan Lerman are at the very top of their game. I 'm going to stick my neck way out and say that Logan Lerman will get an Oscar nomination in a supporting role. He gives a great performance, the best work he's done to date. Fury, as all know, depicts men in furious combat during WWII when even teen boys whether Allied or Axis Forces were thrown into a melée of carnage and slaughter. So I'm wondering why many of the reviewers are lambasting a situation that actually did occur with very young men. I believe they need some very serious history lessons. One reviewer stated," let's teach the innocent boy to kill in three days " along with other nonsense. All through the war and especially in 1945 when FURY takes place, there was such a shortage of manpower on both sides that the young, even children (on the German side) were forced to suit up to bolster what was left of the crumbling German MACHINE! I believe I previously rated FURY a 9. That now goes up to 10. This is one hell of a film WHICH WILL BE NOMINATED AS BEST FILM OF THE YEAR, no question about it!
There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.
Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.
Your age and sex:
We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.