Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    300

    Reviewed by
    angberr@

    A disappointing interpretation of history! The special effects are not enough to save this movie which could have been a true classic but...

    5
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    angberr@  11.3.2007 age: 36-49 123 reviews

    Well, you seem to be reviewing all historical movies as "lost" opportunities for Hollywood. Perhaps you would like to actually state what were the specific problems with the films, except all too common "bad acting" and other blah... Your reviews are just as useless and pointless as that "Hollywood" you dream of.

    HelpfulNot helpful Reply
    drozzy@  22.3.2007 age: 26-35 55 reviews

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The texts posted on this page reflect personal opinions of our users. We are not responsible for their content.

    Did you see ''300''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.