Log in / Sign up
This is an "art" movie. Just enough violence to get people to watch it, with a story that is simple, but incomplete (the ending is so abrupt, some important scenes aren't there but discussed between the actors. Not a surprise it doesn't play on many screens.
There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.
Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.
Your age and sex:
We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.
WARNING: This comment is hidden because it reveals the content of the film.
Click here to show this comment. Incomplete ending? Maybe you left before the guy who stole the money (Moss) was killed, the guy hired to get the money back (Cigurh) retrieved it and the sheriff (Bell) comes to terms with the fact that he has to retire, retires. What more did you want? By "art" movie maybe you meant well shot, well acted, with a story that wasn't wrapped with a Hollywood ending and made you think about what transpired rather than spelling it in huge capital letters. Mind you, it certainly wasn't "Chuck and Larry".
WARNING: This comment is hidden because it reveals the content of the film.
Click here to show this comment. The guy who was hired to retreave the money was the bad guy as he didn't have the right to kill everyone on his path. Moss found the money, so yes 'finders keepers' rule applies here. He simply tried to protect himself and his family. (Even if he give up the money the 'bad guy' said he would still kill him)
"Finders Keepers"? What are you talking about?