Log in / Sign up
 
    Share this page

    The Phantom of the Opera

    Advertisement

    Reviewed by
    quillsinc@

    This version is more true to the actual novel than the overly-dramatized and overly-operized 2004 version. This version at least portrayed the Phantom as a deranged lunatic like he is in the book instead of some romanticized hero. This version is bloodier, darker and more modernized. One of the better non-musical versions. House on the Lake? Dude - the setting is an opera house and under the opera house.

    9
    HelpfulNot helpful  Reply
    quillsinc@  22.1.2005 age: 26-35 143 reviews

    Quillsinc. If you had read the novel you'd know that Gaston Leroux said it was a house on the lake too. Doesn't mean an island. But there is a lake and a river that runs under the Paris Opera house as a part of the sewer system where the story takes place (not London like this version) Do your research before you criticize.

    HelpfulNot helpful Reply
    panswendybird@  11.9.2011 age: 26-35

    Show all reviews for this movie
    Note: The texts posted on this page reflect personal opinions of our users. We are not responsible for their content.

    Did you see ''The Phantom of the Opera''?

    There is a problem with your e-mail address and we are unable to communicate with you. Please go to My Account to update your email.

    How do you rate this movie?

    Select stars from 1 to 10.
    10 - A masterpiece, go, see it now
    9 - Excellent movie, a must see
    8 - Great movie, don't miss it
    7 - Good movie, worth seeing
    6 - Not bad, could be much better
    5 - So so, okay if you don't pay
    4 - Not good, even if you don't pay
    3 - Poor movie, not recommended
    2 - Very bad, forget about it
    1 - Worst ever, avoid at all costs

    Please explain. Write your comment here:

    Please choose a username to sign your comments. Only letters, digits, dash - or period. Minimum 4 characters.

    Your age and sex:

    We publish all comments, except abusive, at our discretion.