64 user reviews
6.0
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
8 10 |
6.2 6 |
4.3 10 |
5.4 5 |
2.3 3 |
5.8 35 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
8.8 10 |
5.6 7 |
3.8 6 |
2.5 2 |
4 2 |
6 27 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
8.4 20 |
5.9 14 |
4.1 16 |
4.6 7 |
3 5 |
6 64 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 64)
I just loved the first one so much that I had to see this one too. It was still pretty good. No complaints. Rob is awesome.
| 8/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 29.2.2012 |
What do you expect? It is exactly what is says it is, unlike most of the other shlock coming out of Hollywood these days. Fun, mindless nonsense. Just laugh at it and walk away!
| 8/10 | person_one@ - 35 reviews 15.11.2005 - age: 36-49 |
Super funny. Corney, but thats to be expected when you are going to see a Deuce bigalow movie! Its worth seeing.
| 7/10 | nicola_golden@ - 9 reviews 20.9.2005 - age: 18-25 |
Pure Slapstick Comedy!! If you have a poor sense of humor, you'll definitely enjoy this one!!!
| 4/10 | u_hv_reached_pooja@ - first review 9.9.2005 - age: 26-35 |
One of the worst movies I've ever watched, I dont know how Rob Schneider accepted this role on the first place. Anyways, I waisted my money on this movie, horrible, not a funny movie, kind of stupid in fact!
| 1/10 | cmdte@ - 9 reviews 8.9.2005 - age: 26-35 |
It's a good thing no one was sitting next to me, at least I was able to put my head down and sleep for a bit. The first one was good, the second one is horrible. Writing, directing, acting... etc. ZERO! Not even on DVD!
| 3/10 | pozcanon@ - 62 reviews 5.9.2005 - age: 26-35 |
The movie was good it was funny but there was some sick parts.
| 7/10 | geoff_molloy@ - first review 4.9.2005 - age: 13-17 |
I really dont get the point of makeing this movie. Some scary parts but not really a horror film... wait a minut it's a comedy?! Jesus it's a pg 13 but anyone over the age of 14 would just find it stupid and repetitive. This movie SHould be a horror flic. Its scary, Rob Schneider acting. :0.
| 1/10 | darkcloud140@ - 4 reviews 30.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
If you liked the first one, you'll love this one!! Laugh all through the movie and afterwards too.
| 8/10 | haywoodjablome97@ - 9 reviews 29.8.2005 - age: 36-49 |
I really didn't enjoy this movie at all. If you want a sexually driven movie than this the one for you. Most of the jokes are about sex in one way or another. Come on! There are wittier ways of expressing humour than that! Complete crap! Don't even wait for the DVD.
| 2/10 | atomic_fission@ - 3 reviews 27.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
I really enjoyed this movie because of the cliches, bad potty humour and homophobia at its funniest. There was never a dull moment. I laughed all through it.
| 7/10 | blondebutsmart99@ - 5 reviews 27.8.2005 - age: 50+ |
I think this movie, halarious... a must see. Better than the first one... haha. Good job. Go see it now!
| 10/10 | summer_paradise3@ - first review 27.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
Every once in a while a movie makes it to the big screen with absolutely no redeeming qualities. This is one. The movie tries to carry itself on filthy language, dumb jokes (? ) and more filthy language instead of a story and actual humor. In a word: TRASH.
| 1/10 | cmandryk@ - first review 24.8.2005 - age: 50+ |
Extremely funny. I cannot see how anyone would not enjoy it.
| 10/10 | kisses69@ - first review 24.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
It was hilarious; even better than the first.
| 9/10 | helen_of_troy1000@ - first review 24.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
It was better than the first, but you can't go in expecting a oscar worthy performance. So considering what it is it's great for a laugh. I think those who gave it bad reviews didn't "get it".
| 7/10 | shoehorn@ - first review 24.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
Definitely a Good Show! The first part is definitely better, but isn't that how it goes? I wouldn't pass the opportunity to see this one again.
| 8/10 | mykidsmom@ - first review 24.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The movie was ok, but im giving it a nine because deuces new girlfriends(sry if I spoiled it for you) is the hottest girl I have ever seen in my friggen life.
| 9/10 | poppills@ - 9 reviews 23.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It was an Alright movie... they kinda went overboard on the whole "penis on the nose" bit. I would have to say the first movie was the better one, and it wasn't so into the Private areas.
| 6/10 | dene_princess66@ - first review 22.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
This is the first movie that actually made me jump out of my seat squealing with laughter since Wedding Crashers. I noticed that people in my own age range seem to love this movie, and anyone older thought it sucked... well, it really depends on your sense of humor (if it's pretty bad like mine), and your maturity level. I went with my boyfriend to see it, and just a word of advise... DO NOT TAKE YOUR PARENTS TO SEE IT WITH YOU!!! You will regret it very much. It really brought out the immature side of me, which isn't always a bad thing right? Rob Schnieder gets a standing O from me =D.
| 10/10 | dkhr@ - first review 22.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
The first movie was a lot better. Was quite disappointed with the new one. Not as funny as it could have been.
| 5/10 | zingerdaddy@ - 2 reviews 22.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
Far worse than the first one. Cheesy jokes and vulgar plot.
| 1/10 | joly@ - 2 reviews 21.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
Nope, it was the same as the original with different chicks in it! Whats the point? Anyway, should never of made a cheap sequel!
| 4/10 | terriparsons28@ - 9 reviews 21.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
HILARIOUS MOVIE! Way better than the first one no doubt. Eddie Griffin really made his character hilarious in this movie compared to the last one and the things to happen to Deuce were way funnier this time around. Definitely worth seeing this movie.
| 9/10 | slix13@ - 104 reviews 21.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
I thought that Deuce was very funny in this movie and was very serious and funny about his role in this movie.
| 10/10 | agentd_opp@ - first review 20.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
[...] It was so boring :( it was funny in like 2 parts but the rest sucked... dont go... very disapointing!
| 5/10 | shadow_war20032000@ - first review 20.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
Well I see a lot of people gave this movie a poor review stating that the movie was very sexual in nature. Well if you look at the title "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" gigolo being the key word, one should be able make the assumption that there is going to be a lot of sexual innuendo. It's a good movie and keeps you laughing most of the time. I would definitely reccommend it to young adults that have a good sense of humour.
| 8/10 | rico_stabbs@ - 2 reviews 20.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
All you people who are giving this movie less than a 5, look at it for waht it is... its COMEDY and it did the job, it was hilarious. If you cant open yourself up to humour... then you should never watch a comedy... Id go and see it again. Get off your stuck up seats and laugh a bit.
| 10/10 | the_gr8_1ne@ - first review 18.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
NOT a children's film. It's all sex-related, which isn't always a bad thing, sometimes it can make a really good movie, but this one fails. It's goofy, and not funny at all. It's repetitive and monotonous. No redeeming features whatsoever. I'm very generous by giving this movie a 6/10.
| 6/10 | famous_nobody@ - 6 reviews 18.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
It was ok... not recommended for kids at all. The joke are mostly (as in 95%) sexually related. It's funny but... exaggerated, not as good as the first one at all.
| 5/10 | linda_battani@ - 13 reviews 17.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
It seems Hollywood has a knack for vomiting sequels without any thought on quality. Now when I talk about quality, I'm talking about the ability to make the audience laugh. This was the sole purpose of this flick. Unfortunately, it failed miserably. Eddir Griffon was the only one to bring a few chukkles but even that was not enough to save this sinking boat. Everything about this movie was terrible. Story: weak. Acting: rotten eggs bad. Characters: unoriginal and not realistic. This movie is to be avoided like Micheal Jackson's bedroom.
| 1/10 | sino74@ - 4 reviews 17.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
Haha, im still laughing now! I can't believe that some people didn't like this movie, well this was a great movie! I agree with some people though, it didn't go along with the first one though, thats why I gave it a 9. It is a great movie go see it!
| 9/10 | lindsay_clarke@ - first review 16.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
It was so hilarious! There was a ton of things that made me laugh, don't miss it.
| 10/10 | zakisaati@ - 3 reviews 16.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
Seems like this one was rushed out to the public without much thought. They tried to capitalize on some of the themes from the first movie but could not pull it off. Must have had different (inferior) writers. Poor effort.
| 3/10 | flickster553@ - 16 reviews 16.8.2005 - age: 50+ |
This moive was too funny. I give Rob Schneider and Eddie Griffin A standing O. You can not compare this movie to the first one, a lot funnier and there is a bit more nudity. I can't wait till it comes on dvd because I will be the first one in line.
| 10/10 | never_enough02@ - 3 reviews 16.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, I would rather watch paint dry than watch this movie. I laughed once when it was over because it was so horrible. The movie previews were longer than the movie. Kindergarten humoour is funnier than this [...]
| 1/10 | cbrowne2003@ - first review 16.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
This movie is made for TEENS and young Adults if your older then this humour could seem dumb and just plain stupid but seriously if your a part of the younger generation or are just very immature GO SEE IT!!!
| 10/10 | cjclosen@ - first review 16.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
It is an alright movie, I expected it to be a more brilliant comedy than the first one, but as usual the sequel struggled. The humor is WAY to sexual for anyone, a penis for a face it lacks humour, it's down right disgusting. There are some gimmicks that made me chuckle, it's a one time movie. It's one of those movies that you go to with your friends when you have absolutely nothing to do. So overall I think this movie is a pittyfull sequel.
| 5/10 | cheesemonkey110@ - 2 reviews 15.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
I went to this movie expecting to have as much of a laugh as the first one. BOY I WAS WRONG!!!, it was the worst movie ever in my life, it was not even funny, what a waste of money. Got my blood boiling about this movie is how much they pertrayed Canadians as tourists who like to deficate on public streets. You can tell Americans made this movie. It sucked bigtime. I wasted 123 minutes of my life on this!
| 1/10 | dory_captain@ - first review 15.8.2005 - age: 36-49 |
One heck of a funny movie. Love the Canadian tourist! Rob S. Keeps me laughing.
| 10/10 | stryperized@ - 3 reviews 15.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
How did this one make it off the studio lot? If your dictionary doesn't explain the word 'stupid' in simple enough terms, see this movie. PS. Eddie Griffin deserves danger pay..
| 2/10 | mj_brown@ - 84 reviews 15.8.2005 - age: 50+ |
I cant believe I took my mom, dad, two teens and my aunt and cousin from out of town, to see this. Im the talk of the family now [...]. Good grief.
| 3/10 | zapperj@ - 49 reviews 15.8.2005 - age: 36-49 |
This was the most [...] movie I have seen EVER!!! And I go to the theatre 1-2 times a week!!! You should give refunds with this one... Extremely disappointed. Spend your money elsewhere!!!
| 1/10 | zoogirl@ - 40 reviews 14.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
It's very funny I love it you will love it also!!!
| 10/10 | skat8erchicklikeavril@ - first review 14.8.2005 - age: 13-17 |
Not as funny as The Wedding Crashers, but if you enjoyed the first one, the sequel is a lot funnier.
| 8/10 | jessemorozoff@ - 5 reviews 14.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
I went to go see this movie with a bunch of chicks! I really wanted to see this movie but it wasnt at all what I was expecting! It was even better [...] lol anyway it was really good go see it!
| 9/10 | rick_54_@ - first review 14.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
Did not enjoy the movie we regret spending so much money to view this film it sucked.
| 4/10 | m_d169@ - first review 14.8.2005 - age: 18-25 |
How could you no like this, it was hilarious... what did people expect an oscar for the acting or original screen play? Yes it pokes fun at all walks of life but it does it fairly to all. Don't all jokes, if you think about them, poke fun at people? If you've seen and liked the first one this one is even better with great one liners that will stick in your head [...]
| 10/10 | noonehome69@ - 3 reviews 14.8.2005 - age: 26-35 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-64]
Did you see ''Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
