58 user reviews
6.6
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
5.7 3 |
7 3 |
6 6 |
5.4 7 |
5.9 19 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
7.2 6 |
6.7 6 |
6.8 11 |
7.1 7 |
6.9 30 |
| Total: Votes: |
7 1 |
9 1 |
6.7 9 |
6.2 13 |
6.7 19 |
6.3 14 |
6.6 58 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 58)
Neither romantic or funny, Morning Glory is a complete waste of time. I only laughed twice, and couldn't tell you what part, if any, was supposed to be romantic. Besides glorifying work, Morning Glory is about nothing.
| 5/10 | zygoto78@ - 273 reviews 28.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
Loved this sweet romantic comedy. It had a little of everything - Just right.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1723 reviews 25.10.2011 |
75% Boreing, the end isn't too bad. It could have been a lot better.
| 5/10 | orkelly@ - 80 reviews 1.1.2011 - age: 50+ |
First movie I have ever walked out of after 20 minutes. Poorly written, poorly directed... do you ever get the feeling they make a movie to take your ten bucks? This is it.
| 2/10 | sensei123123@ - first review 18.12.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Love Rachel McAdams and Diane Keaton, so thought I would catch the movie. It was such a BAD movie, not worth your money. The story was so poorly written.
| 4/10 | ashes3_11@ - 5 reviews 7.12.2010 - age: 26-35 - One reply |
The movie was okay. I expected it to be more intereseting and funny but did not find it funny. There were only few parts of jokes. The ending was not that great. Music was great in the movie. Will not see again.
| 6/10 | dimanta@ - 142 reviews 2.12.2010 - age: 26-35 |
Did not expect much from this movie and only went to see it to eat popcorn :P But I was really entertained! This movie was unexpectedly funny... worth watching!
| 7/10 | the8teen80eight@ - 43 reviews 30.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
It was hillarious at some moments, a little dumb at others, but overal a very good movie.
| 7/10 | owlpotery@ - first review 28.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Do yourself a favor and don't go watch this movie. It was so very disappointing... I mean we've got Harrison Ford, Rachel McAdams and Diane Keaton! You'd think the combination would be great, instead we're left with a plot that falls very short to the actors in it and you hoping you hadn't gone to see it. I looked at my watch a lot during this movie. Bad Bad Bad!
| 2/10 | italian_baby87@ - 14 reviews 27.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
Sooo boring, don't waste the money! It was long and drawn out, a train wreck from start to finish!
| 2/10 | bonsherwood@ - 2 reviews 27.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
I did not enjoy it at all. It was too much of a chick flick and I found the story really long and boring.
| 4/10 | steven@ - 2 reviews 26.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
The story itself could be better. There is some long scenes that I would have cut. Some of the jokes are really funny though. If you want to see it, go on a cheap night!
| 6/10 | sword36@ - 28 reviews 24.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
Good acting; humerous in many parts. A nice evenings entertainment.
| 7/10 | mjs@ - 5 reviews 22.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
When this movie started I thought yikes this is a 6 but it improved. I liked Harrison Ford he was a funny character. Rachel McAdams was very cute and funny as well. As the movie went on I really got into it. It was worth seeing.
| 7/10 | erinlewis33@ - 27 reviews 22.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
Although this movie boasts some terrific actors - Harrison Ford, Diane Keaton, Jeff Goldblum, and the wonderfully fresh and gorgeous Rachel McAdams, the story is derivative and weak and predictable, and the direction is totally over the top, which makes the whole thing ridiculously unbelievable. There are some good moments, and a few chuckles, but all in all a really big disappointment.
| 4/10 | rbarry@ - 3 reviews 21.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
Attention everyone... do not go and see this movie... I was so sorry I went and saw this movie... the story does not hold together and it does not go anywhere... there is no plot... and the story does not make sence. The actors are great but the movie is stupid and not funny... don't waste your time or money on this one...
| 1/10 | cpiscopo@ - 2 reviews 21.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Not too bad of a movie. Great actors, but slow movie at times. Kind of would have liked more to happen in the film.
| 7/10 | sag_74_557@ - 87 reviews 20.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
Rachel McAdams is great in this movie. Good light hearted entertainment. Lots of good laughs.
| 8/10 | tim.dengate@ - 2 reviews 20.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
I really enjoyed this movie. Simple & funny. Rachel McAdams did a great job. Harrison Ford & Diane Keaton should pair up again.
| 7/10 | marik68@ - 4 reviews 20.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
This was a fun film, well played, especially by Rachel MacAdams who brings great energy. Both my wife and I laughed throughout the movie so it was quite enjoyable.
| 7/10 | csauriol70@ - 9 reviews 19.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Oh, this is sooo bad. I would give it 0 if zero was on the scale. It is so awful I would take someone I can't stand along with me to let them suffer through it... that would be poetic payback.
| 1/10 | mikejustleft@ - 7 reviews 18.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
Oops! It's an 8. Changed my mind it really is great. Such good fun. Also forgot to mention Jeff Goldblum and the man who plays Rachel's 'sidekick assistant... don't know his name but have seen him so often and love him.
| 8/10 | redguide@ - 23 reviews 18.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Great movie! Really funny and smart too. Rachel McAdams is hilarious- a great comedian. Her character’s determination and tenacity is inspiring! Diane Keaton is great too. The only thing I didn’t really like was Harrison Ford’s performance. I know the character is supposed to be ‘wooden’, but I just didn’t buy it. I saw Harrison Ford playing a wooden character, instead of the actual character. But other that- great movie!
| 9/10 | coocoosnest78@ - 40 reviews 17.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
A great movie and very funny, I really enjoyed it.
| 9/10 | glamorous_eyes_s@ - first review 16.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
Great cast but saddled with a silly script. Movie that relies on the reputation of its stars and fails to deliver. Wait for the rental. Definltely not worth the money or the time.
| 6/10 | klodio00@ - 159 reviews 16.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
Well acted and believable. Very entertaining - great vehicle for Rachel McAdams as well as Harrison Ford, as never seen before. Go see it! Worth the movie ticket.
| 9/10 | vie.enrose07@ - 14 reviews 16.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Acting was juvenile/immature. Expected more from these seasoned actors. Had some funny moments, but not much to keep your attention. Is it just me, or was the camera work poor? If you're into Romantic Comedies you may appreciate it more. A disappointment. PS, Why is it that so many films (like this one) have to use "Christ" name in vain (so much)?
| 3/10 | jdjefford@ - 187 reviews 16.11.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply |
This is the worst film I have seen all year. It's a snooze-fest. Don't waste your time and hard earned $$$. HF is silly in this role and it is dreadful to watch him.
| 2/10 | marlenehochbaum@ - 76 reviews 16.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
I have not laughed that much at a movie in years. So many laughs! What a comedy worth the $$$ to spend, My hubby loved it so it's not that much of a chick flick.
| 7/10 | myeddie123@ - 21 reviews 15.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
Although this movie was simplistic and had a plot which anyone over thirty has seen a dozen times, it was entertaining and actually had a few moments of halarious comedy. Although the movie was light and uplifting, seven is the highest score I could possibly give this movie.
| 7/10 | wood5112000@ - 12 reviews 14.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
I felt bored during this movie. It just was not funny to me especially given the famous actors that took these roles. Very disappointing and wish that I could have gotten my money back.
| 5/10 | j.serene@ - 4 reviews 14.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Awesome movie u must go see it. I was expecting a romantic chick movie but it was just better. I laughed hard I cared about the sucess of becky and although it has romance, it's not the prime focus. You must go see it :)
| 9/10 | louloute.123@ - first review 14.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
This is NOT Harrison Ford's best work. He is well known for playing in action adventure flics and this role doesn't suit him well at all. I didn't enjoy the film and don't recommend it. It's too wimpy.
| 3/10 | joeljustleft@ - 269 reviews 14.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
A little too syrupy sweet and awkward for H. Ford in this role. However, it's still not too bad.
| 6/10 | jilljustleft@ - 308 reviews 14.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
An entertaining romp and very funny. Loved both Harrison Ford & Diane Keaton.
| 9/10 | foley_av@ - 49 reviews 13.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
It was an upbeat and intelligent comedy that made Rachel McAdams character very relatable. You were rooting for her the entire movie. It was funny in the right parts and the romance was endearing. Ten thumbs up!
| 10/10 | madisonabraham@ - first review 13.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
It was a chick flick, but it was a good one. My friend was adament to see this movie, and being a big fan of glee, they were quite happy. A few laughs mixed here and there along the way and it made me smile. The old ladies in the theatre also provided an amusing atmosphere. Way to go Rachel Mac!
| 9/10 | oompalumpa@ - 6 reviews 13.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
Really enjoyed it! The weatherman stunts made me laugh very hard. The time flew by and that's the sign of a good movie! Also liked that it wasn't some cliche romantic comedy about some guy and some girl... well I guess it was about some guy and some girl just in a different sense...
| 8/10 | christyannross@ - 26 reviews 13.11.2010 - age: 26-35 |
A very entertaining comedy! So many laughs! Rachel was beautiful and smart!
| 9/10 | canary28185@ - 137 reviews 12.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
One of the best films I've seen in months. It was very funny. The characters are well-developed and the acting was terrific. Diane Keaton's irritating personality wasn't too cloying. The storyline flowed well and there was never a dull moment. Great show - definitely worth the money.
| 9/10 | bonfirebug@ - 14 reviews 12.11.2010 - age: 36-49 |
Great interaction here. Harrison Ford sure does a great job as a grouchy news anchor. It was interesting to see how much work goes on behind the scenes of network tv.
| 8/10 | imgrab@ - 10 reviews 12.11.2010 - age: 50+ |
Really really good, no doubt it's a must see movie.
| 9/10 | jessica12yu@ - first review 12.11.2010 - age: 13-17 |
This movie is lacking well... everything. Acting is HORRIBLE, the video editting is low budget, the sound effect sound like they were recorded on a cell phone. What a disgraceful movie.
| 1/10 | j.o.o@ - first review 12.11.2010 - age: 18-25 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-58]
Did you see ''Morning Glory''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
