135 user reviews
6.2
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
9.2 10 |
6.4 8 |
3.8 6 |
4.9 14 |
3.7 12 |
5.4 10 |
5.6 60 |
| Women: Votes: |
8.6 9 |
7.7 19 |
4.9 8 |
7.1 10 |
5.4 14 |
7.2 8 |
6.9 70 |
| Total: Votes: |
8.9 19 |
7.1 28 |
4.8 15 |
5.8 25 |
4.6 27 |
6.2 18 |
6.2 135 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 135)
This was extremely funny! I hated it before, but you have to watch it over and over again to see how good this movie is.
| 7/10 | chw@ - 262 reviews 20.1.2013 - age: 1-12 |
This is one of the worst Adam Sandler movies I've seen, up there with funny people. I thought it'd be funny cause I can relate, but it was sooo cheesy not funny at all, except for a few parts here and there. Wait till it comes on Netflix or something.
| 5/10 | jer_duarte@ - 92 reviews 5.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Not the greatest but as usual it has meaning to it and it was not totally that bad. Is it me or Katie Holmes acting is so dead like. To me she is sweet looking but everywhere she is the same dead like but that's just me I guess. My Fav Adam Sandler movies will and always be: 50 First Dates, The Wedding Singer and The Waterboy.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 28.2.2012 |
I have seen better and worse movies. Some funny parts. Adam Sandler will never win a beauty contest as a woman. Good ending.
| 6/10 | hknapp61@ - 9 reviews 8.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I hated it. It was so bad. Please don't waste your time and watch this. It sucked.
| 1/10 | kyla20260@ - first review 3.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I hated this movie! You can tell this movie was made just for product placement; it was shameless! I love Adam Sandler and most of the cast, but there was no flow to the movie; it was chopped up and was a half-hearted attempt at comedy. You can tell that they are out of ideas when you get a muscular, Jewish, top star, dress him up like a woman and try to pass him off as a woman; it was horrible. Lower I.Q.'ed people found it funny, but to me and other 80+ I.Q.'ed people, it was horrible. There were 2 funny moments in it; I will give it that, but for the most part, it stunk! Now, as for Al Pacino, he was quite good; he's always good. I am shocked that he took this movie on. Adam Sandler lost a lot of respect in this movie and will need to make a blockbuster to gain that respect back, but it will bite him in the butt for years for making it.
| 1/10 | wrellikw@ - 3 reviews 2.2.2012 - age: 50+ |
I think it is really funny and Adam Sandler is as always amazing! Other characters were played very well :)
| 10/10 | andrianakhrupa@ - first review 31.1.2012 - age: 13-17 |
It was so funny I recommend this 2 any1 from 10-30.
| 10/10 | bgrudd@ - first review 29.1.2012 - age: 1-12 |
I loved this movie because I like Adam Sandler. He played a hilarious role as a woman.
| 9/10 | gail_36_121@ - 6 reviews 29.1.2012 - age: 1-12 |
Ok. It is an Adam Sandler's movie. You already know what is his type of humor but for an A. Sandler's movie, it is one of his best comedy. I laughed from the beginning to the end. I laughed after. I laughed at my barbershop. And I'm still laughing just by remembering scenes from it. I'll buy it for sure!
| 8/10 | d_c-e@ - 10 reviews 25.1.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Sandlers movies seem to be a hit or miss. This one is a hit.
| 9/10 | jadexxx1@ - first review 24.1.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Jack and Jill was funny, but it was also kind of weird, with all the Al Pacino stuff at the b-ball game.
| 7/10 | connorhw1@ - 410 reviews 15.1.2012 - age: 1-12 |
It was AWESOME I would pay anytime to go see it!!!
| 10/10 | meagan.love@ - first review 13.1.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Nothing is really funny... just stupid. There was one or two odd moments where people would "chuckle". In conclusion a complete disappointment.
| 3/10 | randomspoon@ - 3 reviews 11.1.2012 - age: 13-17 |
The movie was kinda funny but not as funny as I expected.
| 6/10 | ghzl.ghavami@ - 15 reviews 4.1.2012 - age: 13-17 |
I would have given this movie a lower rating if it was not for the fact that Al Pacino was playing an obnoxious version of himself. The humour is heavy and not so funny. If adore Adam Sandler you will probably like this. If your are not a die hard fan, you catching it on TV won't traumatize you.
| 5/10 | ferling100@ - 47 reviews 3.1.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I went with my boyfriend, my best friend and her boyfriend. It was horrible, I just talked to my best friend through the whole movie, we left the theaters wishing we did not spend the money. There was no good point in the movie. Just that his sister comes to town, and has to stay. There was only one funny part in the movie. Hope I helped! (:
| 3/10 | karinarose@ - 2 reviews 2.1.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Little more romantic, more action and more funny parts.
| 8/10 | m.p.schaan@ - first review 31.12.2011 - age: 13-17 |
I love Adam Sandler's movies. His comedy always has underlying drama and human depth. This one is hilarious at moments and thought-provoking also. I got such a kick out of the added fun of Sandler playing the twins. This has been done before but not with such intricacy of interplay between the twins and complex 'twin' comedy which clearly shows what a talented guy Adam Sandler is. I saw it 3 times and will definitely see it many more times because each time I watch this movie I get more out of it. Al Pacino's presence in the film is an absolute hoot. And the children are terrific also. Don't miss it.
| 10/10 | mdventures@ - 15 reviews 31.12.2011 - age: 50+ |
Some good jokes and some lame ones... I expected more from Sandler.
| 6/10 | manuel0552@ - first review 30.12.2011 - age: 50+ |
If you're 12 years old or under, this movie will appeal to you. Enough said. We left half way through.
| 2/10 | werpets@ - 23 reviews 29.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Adam Sandler dressed up like a girl, done before in a lot of movies. Bring something new to the table. Grown ups was good, so was happy Gilmore. Cmon Man!
| 2/10 | bob@ - 3 reviews 26.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
It was funny n fun but 4 some reson I did not really enjoy it, sorry.
| 6/10 | reb-shore@ - first review 18.12.2011 - age: 1-12 |
Al Pacino must've lost a bet to have appeared in this movie... Sandler is not my favorite comedian but his movies are ususally much better than this crappy movie. See something else, anything else.
| 2/10 | enzo040758@ - 2 reviews 18.12.2011 - age: 50+ |
Movies like this shouldn't get made. I almost walked out on the trailer. This movie has undone everything of Adam's that I used to find funny. It managed to ruin another film. I was watching Melancholia and about half way through the film, all I could hear was Adam Sandler yelling in the theatre next door.
| 1/10 | mr.mathieu.gagnon@ - 5 reviews 16.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
The kids and I enjoyed the movie. Not a movie you wanna take your date on, but we had a good laugh.
| 8/10 | rana4leb@ - first review 14.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
I don't have any idea about expressing but it's really Awesome, Superb.
| 10/10 | neo.anderson@ - first review 14.12.2011 - age: 18-25 |
Funny, makes you laugh... but incredibly and ridiculously LAME... Who wants to watch Adam Sandler dress up as a gal? Just too ridiculous...
| 5/10 | irene_lammylam@ - first review 12.12.2011 - age: 18-25 |
Was expecting a lot of laugh especially with Adam Sandler as a girl. Disappointed that I didn't get to LOL that much. At times, it was boring even with Al Pacino in it. Save your money.
| 5/10 | karen_lett@ - 361 reviews 12.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Horrible movie, infantile with terrible acting, the best part was getting to see a beautiful Carnival cruise ship. It was that bad!
| 1/10 | jwyoshicanada@ - first review 11.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
Don't waste your time or your money. Very lame.
| 2/10 | dawn.newman155@ - first review 11.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Went to the movie because of my friend, recommended. After first 30 min, me and my kids want to go out, everybody thought that why we picked this movie :( ( My friend told that, movie is Al Pacino cannot be bad. It actually was worst.
| 3/10 | sveta_alex@ - 11 reviews 10.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Every movie will have its up's and down's, but overall I enjoyed watching this movie. It was a good pass time. Adam Sandler is really funny in the movie, but in some parts, it just didn't seem funny to me. If I were to go to the movies with my friends, this is a movie I would probably watch.
| 8/10 | pardeep_k101@ - 15 reviews 9.12.2011 - age: 13-17 |
This movie was a very funny movie, me and my friend went to it and it was fantastic. I would see it MANY MANY times again! Best Movie EVER!!!
| 10/10 | kdizzle2219@ - 2 reviews 9.12.2011 - age: 13-17 |
This movie was very funny!!! Adam Sandler has really really funny movies! Dumb and Stupid... but funny are the words to describe him!! Great job Adam Sandler for doing a beautiful movie!! Thank you!!
| 10/10 | coolgurl-xo@ - first review 6.12.2011 - age: 1-12 |
I needed a laugh that day and I got it, more than what I need. I am so glad I watched it. :) I can go watch it again. Thank you Adam.
| 10/10 | ga08@ - first review 6.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
This movie only has a few funny parts. It's full of stupid and disgusting washroom humor. The acting was really bad (especially Adam Sandler) It was really sad to see a great actor like Al Pacino in this lame movie. If you appreciate humor beyond farts and punches then don't watch this garbage.
| 3/10 | rtv_137@ - 4 reviews 5.12.2011 - age: 18-25 |
Another movie by Adam Sandler that is absolutely horrible. There is no pit deep enough for this one. Yikes.
| 1/10 | stanlee@ - 102 reviews 5.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Poor movie... not much strong laughs... go watch it if you have nothing else to do and no other movies to see!
| 3/10 | the8teen80eight@ - 43 reviews 4.12.2011 - age: 18-25 |
Adam Sandler was great as usual! If you like him then it's a must see, don't miss it! I really like it! If you don't like his other movies then don't waste your $ on this one.
| 9/10 | red-camaro@ - first review 4.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
It was alright, some very funny scenes. But overall acting wasn't great, I was actually annoyed by the way Adam played as Jill. His "female" voice is what was annoying. If Al wasn't in the movie I probably would of rated a 4 or 5. Good Job on Al's part.
| 6/10 | speedfreakfrank@ - first review 4.12.2011 - age: 13-17 |
My daughter really wanted to see it but my husband and I were reluctant. In the end, it was better than we thought it would be. We had a few good laughs. Al Pacino was great... as usual.
| 7/10 | tamils@ - first review 3.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Because it includes everything people need in a movie and because it is very funny.
| 10/10 | kkhoudary33@ - first review 2.12.2011 - age: 13-17 |
Too funny, great cast, a must see! (note: go to the washroom before the movie begins, you won't want to miss anything)
| 10/10 | snell_andy_p@ - 12 reviews 2.12.2011 - age: 26-35 |
Love Adam Sandler, love his movies... this one was very bad; not worth the price of admission. Too bad.
| 4/10 | carl@ - 7 reviews 1.12.2011 - age: 36-49 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Did you see ''Jack and Jill''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
