








4.4| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
5.5 4 |
5.8 11 |
4.7 18 |
3.2 19 |
3.9 27 |
3.6 14 |
4.1 93 |
| Women: Votes: |
2 1 |
5.5 2 |
5.6 5 |
3.8 6 |
5.3 16 |
2.8 6 |
4.6 36 |
| Total: Votes: |
5.7 6 |
5.8 13 |
5 25 |
3.6 27 |
4.5 48 |
3.3 20 |
4.4 140 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Weak story line, action sequences ok city's one is much better.
| 5/10 | klassen_thad@ - first review 19.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Such a sick movie! I really enjoyed the special effects and the story.
| 10/10 | d_agretto@ - first review 19.2.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Just saw this movie last night. Terrible. The first one was great but this one was such a disappointment. Didn't even feel like it connected back to the first one a whole lot. The story line sucked but the effects were cool. Also, while some 3D effects are neat, it's still not really worth the price of 3D.
| 5/10 | raspberryrain11@ - 3 reviews 19.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Horrible, horrible movie. No real plot, stupid cheezy lines (if they even bothered speaking at all) along with horrible directing and Nicolas Cage as an actor says it all.
| 3/10 | myobretard@ - first review 19.2.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Pour un fan du Ghost Rider... outch, pour un amateur de film de super héro... outch... pour vouloir juste passé un bon temps au cinéma... re et re OUTCH. J'ai les BD, si on compare, c'est une horreur... ce film est un ramassit d'essais de prise de vue et d'effets visuels mais maladroitement intégrés. Nicolas Cage dans une forme resplendissante pour prendre sa retraite du monde du cinéma. Le diable qui veut renaître dans le corp d'un enfant... génial comme idée, trop original (juste 10 000 film d'horreur dans la même thématique!!!).. ils auraient pu aller chercher Blackout ou Deadwatch comme supervilain ( comme dans BD ).. mais heureusement on a eu la chance de voir Christophe Lambert (hééééééé qu'on est dont chanceux!!!)
| 2/10 | galactus2005@ - first review 19.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This movie does not even come close to the first Ghost Rider. Save your money.
| 4/10 | skyadd12@ - 2 reviews 19.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I can't believe how bad they blew it. The first one was a good campy cartoonish entertainer, where this second installment just failed in all aspects of the genre. Cage is tired looking and a weak character, and the Ghost Rider is a second rate compugen with zero persona. Direction also failed and the plot line is a mess. My boys and I were all disappointed. Save your bucks on this one folks!!!
| 2/10 | rossitermike@ - 2 reviews 19.2.2012 - age: 50+ |
Meh. The first half wasn't bad, I thought. The second half really brough the movie to a screeching halt. I fell asleep near the end. The original comic book didn't have much of a story, but that doesn't mean they couldn't put something together. The first had some character, some charm, which I think was from Eva Mendez and Sam Elliot. The secondary characters in this one were invisible. I didn't see it in 3d, but the visuals were pretty good, so, if you're going to see it it, maybe it'll be worth the extra money. If you're a fan, worth a watch on cheap tuesday, if not, it's a video.
| 6/10 | stanlee@ - 102 reviews 19.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I LOVED the first Ghost Rider movie. I watch it over and over at home. Spirit of Vengeance was sooo disappointing. Told my Mom 'DON'T buy this one!"I will not be watching it again! ' Waste of time & money.
| 2/10 | nikitamorin@ - 2 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 1-12 |
Poorly made move. I plan to keep the directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor in mind when I see a potential movie to see, and then not see it if they directed it. I know from previous Ghost Rider movie was a good movie, the sequel should have been a good movie, but wasn't. Not Nicolas Cage fault.
| 4/10 | mthibert@ - first review 18.2.2012 - age: 50+ |
My gosh, I would have preferred a reboot rather than this mess of a film they put out! No need to elaborate just avoid it.
| 2/10 | sports_fan@ - 45 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Ok this movie sucks. I seriously don't get the over usage of 3D. What I also don't get is why the hell is the ghost rider screaming unnecessarily. There are pauses in the movie which are just showing the ghost rider looking up and screaming for no reason, which looks retarded as hell. Anyways the direction seriously sucked. The dialogues sucked. I wanted to stand up and walk out the cinema 30 minutes before the movie ended, but then I thought lets sit it out.
| 3/10 | happyjonnyboy@ - 22 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Peoples who Booing at the Ghost rider part two! That Cause you HAVEN'T SEEN the part one! SO BETTER watch Part one before u complain about the new movie! Love the movie! Give this a 10!
| 10/10 | kronicboy17@ - 2 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Terrible!!! Avoid avoid avoid! And I liked the original Ghost Rider and like Nicolas Cage movies. Very very poor directing.
| 2/10 | thereviewer@ - 3 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
You will never meet a bigger fan of the original than me. The Rider trades in his Harley for a Yamaha and goes to Europe for a vacation. Pee Wee Herman on his Schwinn with heartburn would have been more entertaining. Stay home.
| 4/10 | nationalperformance@ - first review 18.2.2012 - age: 50+ |
Wow is this movie ever bad! This movie is way worse than the first Ghost Rider movie and that should tell you right there that this is a bad movie.
| 1/10 | lil_shorty_69er@ - 391 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Its good if you havent seen the first one or know the story of the ghost rider. Nicolas Cage does a good job but can tell hes losing his touch. Not a suprise though he hasn't had a good movie for like 8 years. They picked the wrong directors for this movie. Ya the crank movies are well done but the way they filmed this movie was just wrong. Would've been better if they went with the orginal director.
| 5/10 | kevinwandrew@ - 81 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Very slow, boring movie. Totally not worth watching.
| 4/10 | white_devilmix@ - first review 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I think a lot of people won't like the movie but if u like Cage and special effects, it's worth seeing, even though there is no memorable moments. It's also children friendly.
| 7/10 | antoinebi@ - first review 18.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
The first one was really good but this one looked like they just put it together just to say they did a part 2. The special FX was good but the story line and the way they put it together was terrible. I was disappointed big time, so if you want to still see it, wait till it comes out on DVD, so you don't pay as much to see it.
| 5/10 | ron.d@ - 110 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Having been expecting this movie, it was such a disappointment for me. There wasn't as much action as I had hoped at least. The plot was potentially good but the delivery of it was less than stellar.
| 6/10 | aecy_cp@ - 24 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
No story line, the kid's always be kidnaped again, actors are bad, well go see something else and don't waste your time and money!
| 1/10 | guillaume.thibeault@ - first review 18.2.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was a good movie. Great effects and lots of action. Personally it is not my type of movie but my son enjoyed and that says a lot. Realy this is a guys movie!
| 7/10 | maria@ - 24 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
There shouldn't be swearing/profanity in a movie marketed to young kids - many of whom will see this flick! I was disappointed in that and in the choppy editing and lack lustre story telling (script) I felt like I was in an edited down commercial for the real movie that will be available on the DVD! Boo for the profanity - boo for the jagged editing - boo for the poor script and boo for the poor story telling. I recommend the first installment in this franchise and forget about this... movie?!
| 3/10 | rainom11@ - 52 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Ghost rider spirit of vengeance was amazing, I got to say the movie was good but the 3d was awesome, I enjoyed blackout. I give it 10 out of 10, go see it.
| 10/10 | starwarskid99@ - 22 reviews 18.2.2012 - age: 1-12 |
The plot had no meaning and was hard to follow, the acting was awful, and the lines were terribly cheesy. I didn't feel for the characters at all, I just wanted it to be over. Please, PLEASE, don't see this movie!
| 1/10 | super.man.55@ - first review 17.2.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Way better than the first and it follows the story line to a tee in regards to the origin of the rider as an angel who was tormented in hell, then now rises as a spirit of vengeance and at the end of the movie you see the riders complete transformation... perfect.
| 9/10 | dereksmth74@ - first review 17.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This movie was bad, but the special effects and the visual aspect of the movie were amazing. The 3D was also good, but the story the screenplay and the direcring were sometimes horrible. The split-screens and the zoom-in were not necessary. If you liked the first one and badly want to see it, go see it, if not, just don't or wait the blu-ray release.
| 5/10 | kevinw@ - 55 reviews 17.2.2012 - age: 13-17 |
If u have seen the first one then u will like this one to.
| 8/10 | sethi@ - first review 17.2.2012 - age: 36-49 |
About half way through the movie I apologized to my wife for bringing her. And we had coupons so we only had to pay $6 extra for the 3D. We had both seen the first one and enjoyed it. I had read the comics and felt the movie was fairly true to the character. This one had a plot only useful for justifying special effects. No real plot development. Certainly no character development except (maybe) for Moreau. The special effects were okay, but they lacked a story to tie them together. I won't be going to a third one. At least not on the first day. And certainly not without looking at some reviews first. Bad movie.
| 1/10 | disappointed@ - 11 reviews 17.2.2012 - age: 50+ |
Wanted to like it, afterall Nick Cage is in it. But it was really bad. Script was bad, dialogue was bad, did some 10 year old write it? (No offence to 10 year olds)
| 2/10 | goomy@ - 41 reviews 17.2.2012 - age: 26-35 |
This movie was not good, it was worse than the first.
| 4/10 | debbieparillo@ - 20 reviews 17.2.2012 - age: 26-35 |
If u love movie with a lot of effect, well u are serve. Some parts of the movie are a bit too much. But I love it. I wasn't a big fan of the first one, but this was awesome!!!
| 9/10 | sandravonrep@ - 20 reviews 17.2.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I absolutely loved this movie, especially the special effects when Johnny Blaze goes on the town with his motorcycle, leaving a fire streak on the road. There's not one predictable moment as I felt the movie fascinated me the whole time. I didn't even get up to go the the washroom as I was kept interested the whole movie. Nicholas Cage really portrays his character as though he lives it. He's a good guy put in a bad position I thought.
| 9/10 | wishes309@ - first review 10.2.2012 - age: 50+ - One reply |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.