Keswick

140 user reviews

4.4

/10
Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age: 1-12 13-17 18-25 26-35 36-49 50+ Total
Men:
Votes:
5.5
4
5.8
11
4.7
18
3.2
19
3.9
27
3.6
14
4.1
93
Women:
Votes:
2
1
5.5
2
5.6
5
3.8
6
5.3
16
2.8
6
4.6
36
Total:
Votes:
5.7
6
5.8
13
5
25
3.6
27
4.5
48
3.3
20
4.4
140
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.



Reviews from 101 to 140 (total: 140)


Filter reviews

Really good though a bit abstract.

10/10duderockon123@ - first review
19.2.2012 - age: 13-17


Weak story line, action sequences ok city's one is much better.

5/10klassen_thad@ - first review
19.2.2012 - age: 36-49


Such a sick movie! I really enjoyed the special effects and the story.

10/10d_agretto@ - first review
19.2.2012 - age: 13-17


Just saw this movie last night. Terrible. The first one was great but this one was such a disappointment. Didn't even feel like it connected back to the first one a whole lot. The story line sucked but the effects were cool. Also, while some 3D effects are neat, it's still not really worth the price of 3D.

5/10raspberryrain11@ - 3 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Horrible, horrible movie. No real plot, stupid cheezy lines (if they even bothered speaking at all) along with horrible directing and Nicolas Cage as an actor says it all.

3/10myobretard@ - first review
19.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Pour un fan du Ghost Rider... outch, pour un amateur de film de super héro... outch... pour vouloir juste passé un bon temps au cinéma... re et re OUTCH. J'ai les BD, si on compare, c'est une horreur... ce film est un ramassit d'essais de prise de vue et d'effets visuels mais maladroitement intégrés. Nicolas Cage dans une forme resplendissante pour prendre sa retraite du monde du cinéma. Le diable qui veut renaître dans le corp d'un enfant... génial comme idée, trop original (juste 10 000 film d'horreur dans la même thématique!!!).. ils auraient pu aller chercher Blackout ou Deadwatch comme supervilain ( comme dans BD ).. mais heureusement on a eu la chance de voir Christophe Lambert (hééééééé qu'on est dont chanceux!!!)

2/10galactus2005@ - first review
19.2.2012 - age: 36-49


This movie does not even come close to the first Ghost Rider. Save your money.

4/10skyadd12@ - 2 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 36-49


I can't believe how bad they blew it. The first one was a good campy cartoonish entertainer, where this second installment just failed in all aspects of the genre. Cage is tired looking and a weak character, and the Ghost Rider is a second rate compugen with zero persona. Direction also failed and the plot line is a mess. My boys and I were all disappointed. Save your bucks on this one folks!!!

2/10rossitermike@ - 2 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 50+


Meh. The first half wasn't bad, I thought. The second half really brough the movie to a screeching halt. I fell asleep near the end. The original comic book didn't have much of a story, but that doesn't mean they couldn't put something together. The first had some character, some charm, which I think was from Eva Mendez and Sam Elliot. The secondary characters in this one were invisible. I didn't see it in 3d, but the visuals were pretty good, so, if you're going to see it it, maybe it'll be worth the extra money. If you're a fan, worth a watch on cheap tuesday, if not, it's a video.

6/10stanlee@ - 102 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 36-49


Don't make much sense, shouldn't have been made.

1/10brys4230@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Not too bad. Must see it. Good movie.

10/10cjosuevc@ - 3 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


This is very nice Lol yeah Lol.

10/10zkzmars@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 26-35


I LOVED the first Ghost Rider movie. I watch it over and over at home. Spirit of Vengeance was sooo disappointing. Told my Mom 'DON'T buy this one!"I will not be watching it again! ' Waste of time & money.

2/10nikitamorin@ - 2 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 1-12


Poorly made move. I plan to keep the directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor in mind when I see a potential movie to see, and then not see it if they directed it. I know from previous Ghost Rider movie was a good movie, the sequel should have been a good movie, but wasn't. Not Nicolas Cage fault.

4/10mthibert@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 50+


Ok this movie sucks. I seriously don't get the over usage of 3D. What I also don't get is why the hell is the ghost rider screaming unnecessarily. There are pauses in the movie which are just showing the ghost rider looking up and screaming for no reason, which looks retarded as hell. Anyways the direction seriously sucked. The dialogues sucked. I wanted to stand up and walk out the cinema 30 minutes before the movie ended, but then I thought lets sit it out.

3/10happyjonnyboy@ - 22 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Peoples who Booing at the Ghost rider part two! That Cause you HAVEN'T SEEN the part one! SO BETTER watch Part one before u complain about the new movie! Love the movie! Give this a 10!

10/10kronicboy17@ - 2 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Terrible!!! Avoid avoid avoid! And I liked the original Ghost Rider and like Nicolas Cage movies. Very very poor directing.

2/10thereviewer@ - 3 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


You will never meet a bigger fan of the original than me. The Rider trades in his Harley for a Yamaha and goes to Europe for a vacation. Pee Wee Herman on his Schwinn with heartburn would have been more entertaining. Stay home.

4/10nationalperformance@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 50+


Wow is this movie ever bad! This movie is way worse than the first Ghost Rider movie and that should tell you right there that this is a bad movie.

1/10lil_shorty_69er@ - 391 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Its good if you havent seen the first one or know the story of the ghost rider. Nicolas Cage does a good job but can tell hes losing his touch. Not a suprise though he hasn't had a good movie for like 8 years. They picked the wrong directors for this movie. Ya the crank movies are well done but the way they filmed this movie was just wrong. Would've been better if they went with the orginal director.

5/10kevinwandrew@ - 81 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Very slow, boring movie. Totally not worth watching.

4/10white_devilmix@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


I think a lot of people won't like the movie but if u like Cage and special effects, it's worth seeing, even though there is no memorable moments. It's also children friendly.

7/10antoinebi@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


The first one was really good but this one looked like they just put it together just to say they did a part 2. The special FX was good but the story line and the way they put it together was terrible. I was disappointed big time, so if you want to still see it, wait till it comes out on DVD, so you don't pay as much to see it.

5/10ron.d@ - 110 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


No story line, the kid's always be kidnaped again, actors are bad, well go see something else and don't waste your time and money!

1/10guillaume.thibeault@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 26-35


There shouldn't be swearing/profanity in a movie marketed to young kids - many of whom will see this flick! I was disappointed in that and in the choppy editing and lack lustre story telling (script) I felt like I was in an edited down commercial for the real movie that will be available on the DVD! Boo for the profanity - boo for the jagged editing - boo for the poor script and boo for the poor story telling. I recommend the first installment in this franchise and forget about this... movie?!

3/10rainom11@ - 52 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


The plot had no meaning and was hard to follow, the acting was awful, and the lines were terribly cheesy. I didn't feel for the characters at all, I just wanted it to be over. Please, PLEASE, don't see this movie!

1/10super.man.55@ - first review
17.2.2012 - age: 13-17


Way better than the first and it follows the story line to a tee in regards to the origin of the rider as an angel who was tormented in hell, then now rises as a spirit of vengeance and at the end of the movie you see the riders complete transformation... perfect.

9/10dereksmth74@ - first review
17.2.2012 - age: 36-49


If u have seen the first one then u will like this one to.

8/10sethi@ - first review
17.2.2012 - age: 36-49


About half way through the movie I apologized to my wife for bringing her. And we had coupons so we only had to pay $6 extra for the 3D. We had both seen the first one and enjoyed it. I had read the comics and felt the movie was fairly true to the character. This one had a plot only useful for justifying special effects. No real plot development. Certainly no character development except (maybe) for Moreau. The special effects were okay, but they lacked a story to tie them together. I won't be going to a third one. At least not on the first day. And certainly not without looking at some reviews first. Bad movie.

1/10disappointed@ - 11 reviews
17.2.2012 - age: 50+


I absolutely loved this movie, especially the special effects when Johnny Blaze goes on the town with his motorcycle, leaving a fire streak on the road. There's not one predictable moment as I felt the movie fascinated me the whole time. I didn't even get up to go the the washroom as I was kept interested the whole movie. Nicholas Cage really portrays his character as though he lives it. He's a good guy put in a bad position I thought.

9/10wishes309@ - first review
10.2.2012 - age: 50+ - One reply


Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.

Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]   [51-100]   [101-140] 

Did you see ''Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance''?

How do you rate this movie?


Please explain. Write your comment here:


Your age:     Male:   Female: (optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.


Mobile · iPhone · Home · Top 10 · Trailers · Playing · Upcoming · Theatres · Movies · DVD · Promotions · Change City · USA · Contact Us · Français
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.