|Average votes grouped by age and by sex:|
|Total includes those who didn't specify sex.|
I hate to do this to Channing Tatum and Steven Soderbergh but what a bad, bad, bad movie! I am a woman and I wasn't even entertained. The whole movie was sordid, the dialogues were kinda useless since there was no real storyline whatsoever, the end was so predictable and the 9/10 of the cast were just... fillers. What a horrible, horrible, horrible movie! Yikes!
|1/10||havah350@ - 53 reviews|
16.3.2013 - age: 26-35
This was just crap... Very bad filming, the transitions in between the scenes are very badly done, the quality of the image is very poor, the story line doesn't have any dept at all... the whole thing just sucked... my girlfriend didn't like it either... it's just bad!!
|1/10||libero_58@ - 71 reviews|
4.11.2012 - age: 18-25
Found it weak, lame and boring, the only plus side was the dancing. Not bad at all, the strippers movements all of them that is.
|6/10||shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews|
Im a teenage girl lol so I loved this movie of Channing Tatum!!! Haha.
|9/10||teenagegirl@ - first review|
27.10.2012 - age: 13-17
Sexy, yummy! Would love to watch it over and over and over.
|9/10||petawanaqueb@ - first review|
20.9.2012 - age: 26-35
Nice eye candy, story could have been better. Ending was disappointing. It felt like they ran out of time and wrapped it up in a pretty little bow in 5 minutes... too bad, had lots of potential.
|6/10||-nan@ - 3 reviews|
8.9.2012 - age: 50+
I thought it was great! Channing Tatum is the hottest man in Hollywood if you ask me. I have seen it 4 times and will buy the DVD when it is released. I liked the story line. Apparently they did too b/c I understand they are getting ready to film Magic Mike 2!!! Can't wait!
|9/10||beckylynnr@ - first review|
7.9.2012 - age: 50+
I thought they could have worked on the story-line a bit more.
|6/10||haley_king22@ - first review|
30.8.2012 - age: 13-17
I had to leave the theater 30 min in and I never leave the theater. I kept thinking this will get better but it only got worse. Don't bother with this one, there are so many others that are way better.
|1/10||dpfeathers@ - 3 reviews|
27.8.2012 - age: 26-35
BAD movie, BAD! Think it's the worse I've ever seen. Nonexistent acting, no storyline, too long, ridiculous dramas, like who gets strung out on ecstasy? It was just awful. Don't even rent it.
|1/10||bbezoom38@ - first review|
24.8.2012 - age: 36-49
The actors performance was great. All excellent actors. My problem is with the story. You cannot make a great movie with a little story. It lacks of drama. But overall I had a good time. It is a "nice to see" movie.
|6/10||james@ - 16 reviews|
24.8.2012 - age: 36-49
TERRIBLE. There's absolutely no story to this movie. This is just eye candy for girls and some guys.
|1/10||gacar017@ - 62 reviews|
24.8.2012 - age: 26-35
Well, I was kinda expecting a more comedic take on this subject matter. It was more or less a fixated tense at times drama by the time the film finished on being expression to a stage. I did enjoy the usual take that Matthew McConaughey brings on with each movie he has been seen in so far. I will honestly say, I found a few parts in the first 30 minutes hard to sit through. Once Matthew showed up, I was more relieved to see where the film would be going. It does have a story worth telling of carousing guys throwing themselves up on a stage in Florida. Matthew does provide most of the entertainment in the movie. The story does have an emphasis on youth and the sexualization that these men put themselves through. It also deals with the reality of trying to stay in the same profession much beyond their years. But whoever thinks this is a comedy is wrong - sorry. The cool music by mid-end did enhance the expected scenes. All in all, I was happy to have watched it. This movie though is mainly for women to plurge on. I kinda knew this going into it as you may find out.
|6/10||james_leroy@ - 15 reviews|
23.8.2012 - age: 36-49
My best friend saw it, her daughter saw it, my daughter saw it, my co-worker saw it... and we ALL loved it! Not only will we see it again, but it WILL be purchased once it is out.
|9/10||hurtha1@ - first review|
22.8.2012 - age: 36-49
The movie was amazing! I loved the fact that there was romance and comedy all together showing that fantasies should stay fantasies and life is something we can't take for granted.
|10/10||alexia-cutie@ - first review|
19.8.2012 - age: 13-17
I would not chose this movie myself to see, I took my niece to it (and she loved it) While other women are mentioning the hot men, great dancing etc. and loved this movie, I was expecting more from the dancing. I thought the male strippers were awful dancers. We are all very use to seeing women's naked bodies shown gratuitously, but a movie about male strippers only shows the naked bums of men? That's male dominated Hollywood for you. Wasn't expecting much from the acting, dialogue etc, but still felt like a waste of time.
|2/10||anitastocker3@ - 14 reviews|
19.8.2012 - age: 36-49
Finally a chance for women to see something on the big screen. It's been all naked women for way to long. Left the theater hoarse from screaming withthe fellow ladies... and a few men. People keep snubbing the plot, but I thought the story line was great!
|9/10||divasyd@ - first review|
18.8.2012 - age: 36-49
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The eye candy was great, but the plot was seriously lacking. The background stories of the characters were none existent. The female leads acting was atrocious, she must have gone to the same acting school as Kristen Stewart. The ending was almost exciting, until you realize that Magic Mike's big dream must have just been to get into his friend's sisters pants, and not run his own business. Overall disappointing.
|3/10||friesian43@ - first review|
15.8.2012 - age: 36-49
Really good movie with lots of good and funny parts. I love that movie so much, I would go see it every day.
|10/10||claudiaf.8@ - first review|
13.8.2012 - age: 13-17
AWESOME MOVIE!! One for the ladies that's for sure. MORE movies that cater to the LADIES (like Magic Mike) are needed. So sick and tired of naked women being used as "filler" in pretty much every movie to hit the screen. But then again, Men get bored very easily and need to be constantly entertained and titillated via women being exploited and objectified... Men are 'visual' they say - WELL WOMEN ARE VISUAL TOO! I don't know of any woman on the planet who doesn't like to see a hot, half naked man!! We need more movies like this for the ladies!!
|10/10||suzy@ - first review|
12.8.2012 - age: 36-49
Bloody awful. I couldn't figure out if this movie was meant to be a porno flick or a morality tale. It seemed to try to be both and failed miserably. If you're into weak and predictable plots as a vehicle for porn, this is your movie. Lots of insipid dialogue, gratuitous and self-indulgent sex, weak female characters - it's got it all. I don't remember when I've seen a worse movie - I thought it would never end. No charm whatsoever. I'm giving it a two and not a zero because of McConaughey's acting.
|2/10||catcos@ - 2 reviews|
12.8.2012 - age: 50+
Superb movie - at many levels - exceptional dancing, great lessons to learn (how fast life can take us in the right or wrong direction based on a few decisions we make) and last but not least great acting. Very much enjoyed the movie.
|10/10||lorenaheletea@ - first review|
12.8.2012 - age: 26-35
Entertaining! I enjoyed it :) There was also some funny moments. A lot of sexy scenes. Cute :D
|8/10||ftrimech@ - 2 reviews|
11.8.2012 - age: 36-49
The only redeeming quality of this movie is the male strippers. The acting, with the exception of Tatum and McConaughey, was horrific. The female lead was boring, showed no emotion, and was just simply awful. The storyline could have been good if they spent more quality time on it. Clearly the budget for this movie all went into the stripping while the rest was last minute filler.
|5/10||movie_geek@ - 10 reviews|
10.8.2012 - age: 18-25
Great flick and awesome story.
|9/10||ashgagegage@ - first review|
7.8.2012 - age: 36-49
Chick Flick. Fun and entertaining. Talented actors.
|7/10||sandra.grant@ - 37 reviews|
6.8.2012 - age: 50+
Great movie! Was unexpected - I thought it would be just eyecandy/all stripping (have to admit, I was slightly disappointed at that, haha) Actually, quite a dark storyline - I'm sorry some other "reviewers" couldn't keep up with it or missed the point. If guys would open their minds up to seeing this and could get past the stripping, they might enjoy going with their girlfriends - although it's definitely a fun movie for a gal's night out! Want to see it again!
|9/10||whydoesntreginahaveamales@ - first review|
2.8.2012 - age: 26-35
This was the BORINGEST movie I have ever seen. Probably 10 minutes total of dancing/stripping. NO plot. Wanted it to end so bad... but it kept going. How can they make a part two? Haha. DON'T waste your money.
|1/10||jenn@ - 4 reviews|
2.8.2012 - age: 26-35
One word describes this movie... HOT! Went to see it with my hubby, theatre was full... counted exactly 5 men in the whole place! He still enjoyed the story, (but not as much as I enjoyed the dancing and practically naked hot men) Definitely worth a few hours of time, but maybe just go with the girls or your gbf.
|8/10||jmleigh@ - first review|
31.7.2012 - age: 36-49
Fell asleep... no storyline at all. Channing Tatum = only reason I paid a little attention.
|5/10||vicilynn@ - first review|
31.7.2012 - age: 13-17
It was fun watching Tatum dance but other than that the movie almost hurt to watch!
|4/10||cindysoo@ - first review|
31.7.2012 - age: 36-49
It was kinda horrible. The one worth watching? Matt Bomer. The ending was disappointing.
|5/10||magnacarta@ - first review|
30.7.2012 - age: 18-25
So, so... because I didn't pay - a friend dragged me. Matthew McConaughey delivers an extremely entertaining performance... and that's about it for the upside of this movie. As for the context and premise of this movie - meh. Cornball characters and a sister who's attitude isn't really explained anywhere? Hmmm... come to think of it, editing was also a problem with this movie - editing can make or break any movie - any scene - any emotional crescendo - any script. Its an art and it's too bad that there are so many technicians in the business and not enough artists. Unfortunately, this movie is another sad addition to proving that point.
|5/10||rainom11@ - 52 reviews|
30.7.2012 - age: 36-49
Channing's dance moves are out if this world the movie wasn't that bad. The only bad thing in Magic Mike was the girls poor poor acting skills.
|7/10||elen_g1@ - first review|
30.7.2012 - age: 26-35
No story line; however, it was quite entertaining for us, women. The music played was great. The strippers really danced well. Did I mention the clothes they worn when dancing? Just awesome. This movie should be rated 18+ as this is not suitable for 14yr olds! I really had a good time with my friends.
|8/10||lily@ - first review|
30.7.2012 - age: 36-49
Great looking men with great bodies. Lame story line.
|7/10||glor@ - first review|
30.7.2012 - age: 50+
A must see if you are a woman. I really enjoyed.
|9/10||jozel35hotmail.com@ - 27 reviews|
30.7.2012 - age: 36-49
This was the worst movie that I have seen in a long time and I go to the movies a lot. The story line sucked, the movie dragged on for ever, the actors sucked on this movie.
|1/10||little_angel_678@ - first review|
29.7.2012 - age: 18-25
I was really looking forward to this movie but found it very boring and the storyline was terrible. My friend and I left very disappointed.
|6/10||mm13@ - 18 reviews|
29.7.2012 - age: 26-35
I saw the chippendales years ago & they had nothing on this movie. If you have a problem seeing bare bottoms, don't go see it. I for one thought it was very well done.
|9/10||mhaughc600@ - 2 reviews|
28.7.2012 - age: 50+
Hot new movie for women to watch!!! Great story line!
|8/10||patsy.rayborn39183@ - first review|
28.7.2012 - age: 26-35
Could we have a plot, please?
|5/10||psychsmith@ - first review|
27.7.2012 - age: 50+
Great Movie would love to see it again.
|9/10||babefroggie34@ - first review|
27.7.2012 - age: 26-35
OMG, it didn't even worth a 5$ at the videotron and not even a 2 hours of my life! I still can't realize how boring it was!
|1/10||alexs04@ - first review|
27.7.2012 - age: 18-25
Best movie ever! Male strippers, yeah! ;) I'm a girl and finally a great movie with hot guys for girls! I'm tired of every movie showing women, women like to see men! Hope there is more movies like this. Men can't have all the fun! GREAT MOVIE. CHANNING TATUM IS HOT! :D
|10/10||zeibaqsarah@ - first review|
26.7.2012 - age: 18-25
It was an eh! movie. Very tepid with drama and Matthew McConnaughey's performance was bewildering. I like watching Channing Tatum but no this time. Like I said, eh!
|5/10||mackpeg4@ - first review|
26.7.2012 - age: 50+
A complete waste of time - boring. I will never feel the same about Matthew McConaughey again.
|4/10||hwilliamson222@ - 6 reviews|
26.7.2012 - age: 50+
I think Channing did good with his acting, however, the other supporting actors seemed like they just enrolled in acting school. I expected Matthew to shine in his role, but he came up short and looked old and washed up. The story sheds a light on the underground world of stripping and drugs and how easily things can get dangerous and out of control. It's a film that I would have rather seen at home.
|6/10||b.holiday@ - first review|
Great movie, Channing Tatum looks great! Worth watching, not as good as I thought it would be! I would watch it again though. If you want a good laugh this movie is deffs the movie you want to see, Alex and Channing both look sexier than ever. Great movie!
|9/10||vicandmads@ - first review|
25.7.2012 - age: 13-17
It was exactly what it was - eye candy, and for that, and a theatre filled with women older than me, it was pure entertainment. Nice to see the shoe on the other foot, with women able to just enjoy the male human form, in all its splendor. Okay story line, but not what I'll remember about it. :)
|7/10||task@ - 5 reviews|
24.7.2012 - age: 50+
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.