








6.9| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
8 2 |
- 0 |
6.7 3 |
6 1 |
7 6 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
6 1 |
- 0 |
7 2 |
6.7 3 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
8 2 |
6 1 |
6.7 3 |
6.7 3 |
6.9 9 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
It is asome! I like Rene Angelil and Celine Dion, they are very good!
| 10/10 | dragoscojocariu@ - first review 31.3.2013 - age: 18-25 |
It was basically like a really long TV episode. There was nothing really original or avant-garde in the movie; a bit lackluster.
| 6/10 | fairy_marie@ - 18 reviews 22.7.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Well I disagree with the upper comments , the movie story was very good and Huard is the best. Lefebvre was not very good sexy girl at all. She was not very good in that movie...
| 8/10 | hdhtbath@ - first review 21.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This movie is very frustrating. The three main actors: Stéphane Rousseau, Patrick Huard and Michel Côté are good actors, but unfortunately, the story is horribly paced. The lack of action is the worst part. You're just waiting for something fast paced and thrilling to happen, but it is a slow movie. No suspense, predictable plot points. The use of René Angélil is a horrible choice. This man is not an actor, and you can't take him seriously, especially not in the role he plays. It isn't really certain what kinda character he is playing, which makes it even more frustrating. Thankfully, some funny lines were delivered by Huard, Rousseau and Côté. Also, Rachel Lefebvre, of Twilight fame, delivered a performance which I thought could have been better. Having her randomly switch from english to french was weird, as characters mostly stuck to one language. In conclusion, it is not a horrible movie, but it won't blow you away. Go see it, not expecting much, and it might be entertaining enough.
| 6/10 | ronny.alnosir@ - first review 21.7.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I loved the series when it was on Tv, and the movie was not bad. However, it was hard to keep a straight face looking at Rene Angelil performance, everytime he said something I kept laughing and by hearing people in the theather I wasn't the only :)
| 6/10 | sentenza99@ - 600 reviews 19.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Their story very good, but the way the movie was done, not that well, could have been a lot better. It was missing the action, the suspense... the performances not that amazing either. The best was Patrick Huard and Stephane Rousseau. Rene Angelil can't act.
| 6/10 | greco64@ - 404 reviews 14.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Unfortunately, the choice of René Angelil was a very bad one. He is NOT an actor and his performance is pathetic. The plot is not too hot and real action is missing. Luckily we have 2 very good actors in Stéphane Rousseau and Patrick Huard. They steal the show. Rachel Lefevre is also very good. Al in all, not so bad and at the same time a bit boring. I would have expected much better from Mr. Dionne.
| 6/10 | andreebesner@ - 4 reviews 11.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
Not bad, but could have been better. The television series was much interesting than the movie.
| 6/10 | left26@ - 10 reviews 11.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
For fans of the TV series, this is a must-see. Famous Quebec stars were in the movie including Rene Angelil in a minor role, good drama movie! Worthwhile!
| 8/10 | vblackie5@ - 272 reviews 19.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.