Gaspé

94 user reviews

3.2

/10
Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age: 1-12 13-17 18-25 26-35 36-49 50+ Total
Men:
Votes:
-
0
4
1
4.6
13
4.1
10
3.6
10
3.4
17
3.9
51
Women:
Votes:
-
0
-
0
2.4
8
2
6
1.8
13
3.1
7
2.2
34
Total:
Votes:
-
0
4
1
4
24
3.1
20
2.5
24
3.3
24
3.2
94
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.



Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 94)


Filter reviews

Crude. Vulgarity is rarely humorous which this film proves. Fortunately I had to leave early.

2/10tmbrunk225@ - 6 reviews
21.2.2013 - age: 50+


No. 1. I am not a prude. In fact I can be crass and crude but this movie was hopeless. There were some legit laughs in it but for the most part it was too low brow. I am pretty sure no religion, race, or gender identification was spared an insult. Save your money!!

2/10scott@ - first review
13.2.2013 - age: 36-49


The movie was good for a laugh. You should know when you go... the movie doesn't make sense... has no story line. It's just a compilation of different scenes... which definitely had my husband and I laughing. Just don't expect much.

6/10shalene_mcneil@ - 12 reviews
12.2.2013 - age: 26-35


Funny. Relaxes. Leaves in great mood. For one time only, but still worth seeing, if you have a chance.

8/10natalie.kisil@ - first review
12.2.2013 - age: 18-25


The best movie I've ever watched.

10/10joshman_1989@ - first review
12.2.2013 - age: 18-25


Horrible movie! Why would these well known and talented actors want to be associated with this movie? Do they need the money so badly? This movie was gross, offensive, not funny. There wasn't one redeeming quality about it. What a waste of Time and money!

1/10nikiki@ - 3 reviews
8.2.2013 - age: 50+


This is the worst movie i've ever seen. The part with the horse [...] was disgusting.

1/10newbiecrazydays@ - first review
7.2.2013 - age: 18-25


This is the worst movie I have ever seen! I wanted to leave because it felt like a waist of time to watch it. I didn't hoping it would get better... but it didnt, it got worse. I probably wont go see another movie with those actors either... wasting my time with stupidity!

1/10katestamp@ - first review
5.2.2013 - age: 18-25


Just so damn funny, Hugh Jackman skit with Kate Winslet and Anna Faris made it worth the money.

7/10asad.nasiri92@ - first review
5.2.2013 - age: 18-25


The amount of good actors in this movie might make you think "Can't be that bad, come on, all of these A-listers couldn't have said yes to being in this movie if it were as terrible as everyone says it is! Right? " WRONG, it's worse than you think. Not funny. No story. No good lines. No ending. No start either for all it matters. Basically, a bunch of millionaires got together, drank a lot of alcohol, did some drugs, called their friends, convinced them to be in the movie and then somehow got us to pay to see this vulgar "comedy".

2/10roosa-karoliina@ - 2 reviews
4.2.2013 - age: 18-25


My husband wanted to walk out but I thought it had to get better. I was wrong. It was horrible and a big waste of time and money.

1/10jyvette@ - 3 reviews
4.2.2013 - age: 36-49


Movie made up of short skits. Think this was aimed at a much younger audience. Some, very little humor. Lots of people left early. Wish I would have waited for the reviews to come out.

3/10kds@ - 4 reviews
4.2.2013 - age: 50+


Wow nobody has a sense of humor! Slackjawed humor for the thinking person, not complicated just crude. If you loved 'Kentucky fried movie" or "Tunnel vision" you may enjoy "Movie 43." Lots of great actors making some nasty short films, grab some popcorn, and your sense of humor... if you have one. The Anna Faris skit made me burst out laughing! Stupid funny.

7/10gordiewise@ - 6 reviews
4.2.2013 - age: 36-49


Rip off... Very bad taste... Not funny... Several people left early... I have lost respect for these actors.

1/10gross1965@ - first review
4.2.2013 - age: 36-49


It started off looking like it could be a real funny comedy movie, but it quickly went downhill and I just didn't get the point of it. A waste of time except for the Hugh Jackman and Kate Winslet segment.

3/10naomisweeney@ - first review
2.2.2013 - age: 50+


So repetitive that you are bored witless twenty minutes into the film.

4/10riverbanky@ - first review
2.2.2013 - age: 26-35


I had no idea what this movie was about since my 18 year old daughter picked it. Honestly it was not the worst movie I have ever seen nor the greatest but it was funny within all its crudeness. I would rather see something like this than another Adam Sandler movie like "That's my Boy". His acting is so lame with his false voices and such. Anyway it was a switch from some of the really lame movies being produced these days. Whatever has happened to great scripts... has the texting generation finally lost sight of what good conversation is?

6/10betannmeow@ - 8 reviews
2.2.2013 - age: 50+


If you want to see totally off the wall crude comedy then this is for you! I almost got up and left a couple of times early on, but somehow it managed to keep me wondering what was coming next!!! The list of actors probably had a lot to do with continuing to watch this one!

6/10jimedgar2@ - 178 reviews
2.2.2013 - age: 50+


Don't waste your money! Some big stars in it and I'm still baffled as to why they would ever agree to participate in such an awful show! It is the worst show I have ever seen!! TERRIBLE.

1/10kathy@ - 4 reviews
1.2.2013 - age: 36-49


Incredible movie, I laughed so hard and so did everyone in the theatre. [...] Yes the movie has no plot, granted the movie is edgy and borderline offensive, but who gives a S-it? A least is something new, not another fast and furious or dance in the streets brainless movie. I found it absolutely funny and I am sure that so did everyone who gave it a 1/10. Definitely worth watching, please hollywood produce more films like this and take my money. And I applaud all those great actors who had the testicles to participate in such a great project. Thank you director and cast, I had not laughed that hard for over 12 years. I am one of those who say that there is no more originality left in hollywood, since all they do is 7 versions/parts of the same movie, and I have to say with movie43 - Faith in hollywood restored.

10/10luis85_12345@ - first review
1.2.2013 - age: 26-35


A hilarious, but pretty horrible film. Wait till it's on cable.

4/10goosebumps84@ - 186 reviews
31.1.2013 - age: 13-17


TRASH! I love comedy, even "raunchy comedy" but this one was the worst movie that I have seen in a very long time.

1/10corymmartin@ - first review
31.1.2013 - age: 26-35


Garbage. What were these excellent actors thinking when they accepted money for this dribble.

1/10val.ruffo@ - 5 reviews
31.1.2013 - age: 50+


This film is an abomination... and that is being kind. Pure shock-schlock. It is really difficult to imagine anything worse than this piece of excrement. What is even more difficult to imagine is how its producers were able to convince very fine actors and actresses to perform in it. One can only imagine that it evolved out of some hollywood diner party gone completely mad! A dinner party with hubris as the the main course and bad drugs for desert. Kate Winslet... what were you thinking? What are you going to tell your grandchildren? You are going to need a refresher course in Shakespeare to rid yourself of the stench of this film.

1/10enodesign@ - 3 reviews
31.1.2013 - age: 50+


Awful! This is like the worst move I've ever seen in my life. I'm not exaggerating. Is complete and utter sh**. And they tried so hard to be funny.

1/10lala@ - first review
31.1.2013 - age: 26-35


My husband and I have a great sense of humour and typically enjoy movies that are funny, light-hearted and you don't have to think too hard about - it's a nice break from the stress of jobs, family and other realities. After watching this movie we felt "stupid" for having spent money and wasting valuable time watching this.

1/10rba@ - first review
31.1.2013 - age: 36-49


This was the absolute worst movie I have ever seen... no plot... just crap!

1/10caitlinhardy22@ - first review
30.1.2013 - age: 18-25


So this movie is very simple to rate. You hate it or you love it. If you are open minded you will love this movie. I had a great time seeing it. It's jackass and scary movie together. A must see.

9/10ngmaininc@ - first review
30.1.2013 - age: 50+


Worst movie ever. Surprising so many good actors took a part in this horribly stupid creation. Avoid at all costs.

1/10kitanochka@ - first review
30.1.2013 - age: 18-25


Finally, Hugh Jackman grows a pair and shows us and Chloe Grace Mortz (sp?) shows us that, as an actress, she can do Period pieces. Now, that's gotta be worth at least a six (6) :)

6/10jack_simpson@ - first review
29.1.2013 - age: 50+


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
It's not everybody's cup of tea but it's a movie made of skits that push the envelope in any, every single possible way, so be ready for very crude, raw, morbid and gross entertainment... but oh so funny! There were moments where I couldn't contain myself and others that were not funny, yet I enjoyed it. It's different. I don't see what the whole fuss and lynching of this movie is all about, they clearly haven't seen 'The Room'... it's like 'Valentine's day' but directed by all of Sacha Baron Cohen's characters... on potent drugs. You get a lot of Halle Berry's chest!

8/10jono@ - 6 reviews
29.1.2013 - age: 26-35


Making garbage thus bad should be made a criminal offence. Otherwise, if there is a reason to believe that a mental handicap is the root cause, people responsible for making such an idiocy should be confined to a mental institution – pronto!

1/10drugdesetar@ - first review
29.1.2013 - age: 50+


Just terrible. How did they get these actors to participate? Skip it.

2/10brandy_irish@ - 140 reviews
29.1.2013 - age: 36-49


Awful, disgusting I was embarrassed just sitting in the theatre, what were the producers thinking!! Goes to show you that you don't need brains to make a movie!!! Waste of money and time.

1/10pamarcher99@ - 12 reviews
29.1.2013 - age: 36-49


This movie has got to be the most offensive thing I've seen! It's offensive in the right context which makes it hilarious. Everyone in the theater was roaring with laughter. [...] Fantastic comedy.

10/10sunfloweratah@ - 5 reviews
29.1.2013 - age: 18-25


Toxic waste, avoid if humanly possible.

1/10walter2@ - 92 reviews
28.1.2013 - age: 50+


There's been very few movies I've wished I walked out of. This was one of them, but so glad this time I took the opportunity to walk out and get a refund. I'll use it to watch a movie actually worth my time and money. Stayed to watch 40 min of it, way too long and 40 min of my life I'll never get back. Do not waste your time or money!

1/10twinnstarz@ - first review
28.1.2013 - age: 26-35


Funny as hell. Laughed so hard. But in all honesty it's a dumb movie, movie with no point to it.

7/10her_man7@ - 2 reviews
28.1.2013 - age: 18-25


Gross, disgusting, not funny at all. Maybe a 13 year old would think this is funny but it's a completely disgusting movie. Not funny at all. GROSS.

1/10roofingbuster@ - 3 reviews
28.1.2013 - age: 26-35


I really like a good humor movie; but this was just a plain stupid movie with only a few funny scenes. I wasted my money and I hope you do not do the same. Wait for it to be free on TV.

4/10army_and_trucker@ - 291 reviews
28.1.2013 - age: 36-49


It made me laugh at one point to the point of tears. Other parts were fairly offensive. You need a warped sense of humour to appreciate it.

7/10lauresp@ - first review
28.1.2013 - age: 50+


I do not ever write reviews but feel that (if you haven't already read other reviews) that I must warn you to NOT EVER SEE THIS MOVIE. It is the worst movie I have ever seen in my entire life. Not funny at all. Disturbing that it was ever even made. I am not sure how they convinced actual famous actors to be in this. What an embarrassment. I walked out of the theatre and asked for my money back. Not joking. Do not waste your time or money on this movie. Ever.

1/10sweetrackle@ - 4 reviews
28.1.2013 - age: 26-35


One of the worst movies I've ever seen... I walk out of the theatre.

1/10mandii-marie@ - first review
28.1.2013


So many A list actors, so terrible. Only film I have ever considered walking out on. SAVE YOUR MONEY!!!

2/10nvmd143@ - first review
28.1.2013 - age: 36-49


This is what happens when many actors smoke too much pot and decide they're going to make a movie as a joke.

3/10stonehill@ - first review
27.1.2013 - age: 36-49


Nice one. But with some unpleasant scenes.

7/10ikdozie@ - first review
27.1.2013 - age: 26-35


Funny funny movie laughed all through the movie.

9/10nattynic@ - first review
27.1.2013 - age: 36-49


Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.

Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]  [51-94]  

Did you see ''Movie 43''?

How do you rate this movie?


Please explain. Write your comment here:


Your age:     Male:   Female: (optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.


Mobile · iPhone · Home · Top 10 · Trailers · Playing · Upcoming · Theatres · Movies · DVD · Promotions · Change City · USA · Contact Us · Français
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.