Montréal

25 user reviews

8.3

/10
Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age: 1-12 13-17 18-25 26-35 36-49 50+ Total
Men:
Votes:
-
0
-
0
-
0
9
1
8.8
6
8
5
8.5
12
Women:
Votes:
-
0
-
0
9.5
2
9
1
6
1
7.8
5
8.1
9
Total:
Votes:
-
0
-
0
9.5
2
9
3
8.4
9
7.9
10
8.3
25
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.



All 25 reviews...


Filter reviews

Richly done and awesome actors with lots of great scenes, costumes and sets. Was slightly long and yet some of the dialogue from Rachel was a lillte silly, don't you think that almost made no sense at all.

7/10shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews
31.10.2011


A moving movie. Very classic of the era. Makes a lot of sense if you are the type that you're aware of your sense of being. Great Movie.

9/10saade@ - first review
3.9.2010 - age: 26-35


A brilliant movie showing how religious beliefs (pagan, Christians and Jews in this case) can lead to senseless violence and at the expense of greater knowledge.

10/10clifforda@ - 92 reviews
15.8.2010 - age: 36-49


Really enjoyed the movie, despite taking place in ancient history, the topic is still very current. Recommended!

9/10jimenezm.mcarolina@ - 2 reviews
9.8.2010 - age: 26-35


It is a good movie. Good acting, but the two leading men were a bit too light, not carrying the movie... The villian was greatly acted, overpowering the leading men... Nonetheless, very entertaining, very eye-opening to see a bit of history in the film maker's eyes.

8/10howardtaco1999@ - 69 reviews
19.7.2010 - age: 36-49


Very good movie, but just a movie. It shouldn't be taken as "gospel", if I may. But more seriously, it's not 100% historically accurate. The director took some freedom, which is normal since he needed to express his views on the topic. Nevertheless, viewers should also read about the topic if they want to learn more about it. A movie, even as wonderful as this one, is never enough. We cannot summarize the religious experience to what is portray, even when it comes to ancient times.

10/10konan_a@ - 4 reviews
15.7.2010 - age: 36-49


Agora was an amazing film! The acting, set and story were all very well done. It was also really inspiring to see a female historical figure that was brilliant, brave and scientific finally get recognized. Most of all the film really portrays the idea that reason and intellect need to be protected from religious fanatics---at any period of time.

10/10mara_33_9@ - 2 reviews
13.7.2010 - age: 18-25


This movie left me with mixed feelings. I learned a lot about the story of Hypatia and about the burning of the library at Alexandria (although I realize that this highly fictionalized) The visuals and the spectacle were very well done. Rach Weisz was excellent, but the movie felt awkward and dated in many ways. Its themes about religious dissent and the pettiness and pomp of religion are relevant today and putting it the context of the massiveness of the entire solar system was effective. There were many parts of the movie where actors seemed miscast and the movie felt stilted.

6/10helenl8@ - 80 reviews
10.7.2010 - age: 50+


I thought the movie was excellent, great costumes, historical and totally relevant to what is still happening to this day regarding religious wars.

10/10c6934@ - 9 reviews
9.7.2010 - age: 50+


Excellent script writing. Excellent directing. Excellent acting. This movie has it all, especially with its attention to historical detail and capacity to illustrate on screen what happens to the human thought process, no matter how inspired in its origins, when it encounters mob psychology. I was deeply satisfied with my film going experience, as was one of my like-aged, literate male friends in Ottawa.

9/10phl222@ - 20 reviews
9.7.2010 - age: 50+


I haven't been able to stop thinking about this film since I saw it. A historical drama about the philosopher and teacher Hypatia, and the burning of the library in Alexandria, it deals with universal issues that are still relevant today, namely the eternal battle between reason and faith. None of the conflicting religions come of well (Christianity, Paganism, Judaism) The burning of the library was a historical tragedy. Carl Sagan once wrote that if the knowledge of the library had survived, man would have made it to the moon centuries earlier. The fact that it was burnt in the name of religion and in fear of science - well, things like that are still happening today. Whatever your belief system, this film will provide plenty of fuel for intelligent dialogue. Just go and watch with an open mind. Every aspect of the film was excellent. Rachel Weisz deserves and Oscar nomination - it is her finest acting. The sets and costumes are recreated historically and beautifully. The camerawork is creative, and the script is thought-provoking. The movie won several awards in Europe. I suspect that the religious right in North America is impeding the film's progress here. Don't miss it!

10/10singdude@ - first review
9.7.2010 - age: 36-49 - One reply


This was a beautiful movie. The sets were amazing, the acting was wonderful and story was fabulous! Love to see a movie where the female protagonist is highly intelligent, independent, free thinking and unmarried. Go see it!

9/10pixieblue75@ - 3 reviews
7.7.2010 - age: 18-25


I wanted to see this movie mainly because I had never seen anyone portray Hypatia's life as the focus of a movie. That, and the other choices available to me on the evening in question were pretty painful. I found the film to be somewhat compelling, but also plodding and awkward at times. I'm glad I paid less than $10 to see it. It wasn't terrible, it had its moments. I don't know if it's a "must see on the big screen" movie though.

6/10transmit_source@ - first review
4.7.2010 - age: 36-49


Brilliant movie! My friend mentioned the movie and she wasn't sure what it was about; all she knew it was about ancient egypt - thats the only reason I went to see it. The movie is about love, faith, and science. All actors played so well. I think it's called agora because of it's later function i.e. marketplace. Those who yell really loud and can market their goods and thats how the birth of a religion was portrayed in the movie.

9/10dexteriot@ - 16 reviews
4.7.2010 - age: 36-49


I don't get out to see films much these days but I happened to see Rachel Weisz interviewed by Charlie Rose and it drew my attention to this one since I find this subject matter facinating. It was a moving experience for me and I thought the production was sumptuous. Of course there are difficulties in making a movie like this since it has to tread a line between historical content and entertaining drama. To really do it right it would have to be about four hours long so I won't hold it against the director if either aspect was not completely filled out. Although many of the details were speculative it will hopefully reveal to movie-goers who know little about the history of science and religion some of the events that have shaped the world we live in today and how people think and act as they do. It may actually inspire some to look this stuff up. Incidentally there were a few bits of subtle visual symbolism thrown in for good measure. Rob R.

9/10syntaxsigns@ - first review
24.6.2010 - age: 50+


My taste in movies is varied upon my mood, time of day, etc. This is an afternoon matinee movie for me. It is very serious. The movie touches on material that is so very timely: the themes of the role of religion in the state, and science versus religion. There is a lot of violence between the three religious groups, vengence by the masses instigated by their leaders for the purposes of the latter. I wished the movie had put more emphasis on the intrigues of the various religious leaders, particularly the bishop of the Christians, to gain political leadership in the city. This was the plot of the movie; however, the final takeover by the Christian bishop was in written statements at the end. It was very interesting that the tension between science and religion was only insofar as these two belief systems, having an inquisitive mind as opposed to an absolute belief in God, could be used to defeat your political enemies rather than the rightness of the ideas proposed by each. The movie could have been better, but it sure makes you think about the world today.

7/10mcgoey_mc@ - 17 reviews
21.6.2010 - age: 36-49


Very original, brilliant film, set in a very important time in History. A must see if you are not interested in reading a lot of history books. This will sum up what you missed and give you a deeper understanding about the so-called religious wars, the truth behind the massacre and the destruction of beautiful art, architecture and what once was.

10/10hildove@ - 2 reviews
19.6.2010 - age: 50+ - One reply


A massive daring project to undertake, on the scale of a David Lean movie. Innovative in the cinematography and editing. Sets beautifully recreated. The plot a bit hard to follow at times could have done with a tighter rewrite. The subject is fascinating but not for your average Hollywood viewer. Ms. Wiess carried the movie well but looked pale and washed out at times. Perhaps a touch more makeup in the close ups. Overall it was a refreshing enjoyable movie that shows an incredible creative effort - the credits at the end go on for ever. I loved it and would recommend it.

8/10alanwilding@ - first review
18.6.2010 - age: 50+


Don't understand why this movie was made. The sets are great, but it's a boring costume drama that isn't compelling or particularly relevant.

4/10johanna@ - first review
13.6.2010 - age: 50+ - One reply


This movie is a sleeper. It digs deeper than most of its genre have done previously. As it takes license with what historical facts are not critical, it moves us from a Greek tragedy in form to a most contemporary allegory. As a “take away” from this the underlying problem may very well not be human ignorance, not religion, not lack of courage, not sincerity or lack thereof, not greed, and not lust for power, but the very unevolved levels of human consciousness which inevitably express as these. It is well worth more than the time viewed.

9/10weefolk@ - first review
13.6.2010 - age: 50+


The theme of the movie is very provocative since it emphasizes an era of the Christian faith which is very often romanticized. Indeed, parallels can be drawn between this period of history and our current experiences of religious intolerance & misunderstanding. However, the acting and dialogue was very weak. I wanted to know more about the library.

6/10angberr@ - 110 reviews
13.6.2010 - age: 36-49


She was telling them about buddha, she was telling them about mohamed in one breath, but clearly, she did not care to tell them about the innocent one, the one who came and died for the guilty... the sacrificial lamb... the lamb of God. I mean, let's face it, there she was, in the then prime centre of knowledge in the then known world and she does not even care to ask even a simple question like, e. g.," how close is uranus to mars? " other than this, the movie was 'comme si, comme ça'.

5/10scbj10@ - first review
12.6.2010 - age: 50+ - 10 replies


Great! To live life for the purpose of the question.

10/10surfspark@ - first review
12.6.2010 - age: 36-49


This film has great acting, costumes and sets.

9/10narmiento@ - 4 reviews
22.5.2010 - age: 50+


Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.

Did you see ''Agora''?

Write a movie review and you could WIN free tickets!!! (details about the promotion)

How do you rate this movie?


Please explain. Write your comment here:


Your age:     Male:   Female: (optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.


Mobile · iPhone · Home · Top 10 · Trailers · Playing · Upcoming · Theatres · Movies · DVD · Promotions · Change City · USA · Contact Us · Français
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.