|Average votes grouped by age and by sex:|
|Total includes those who didn't specify sex.|
Horrible! Bad action bad acting!
|1/10||monicafia@ - 156 reviews|
8.2.2013 - age: 26-35
Gina Carano is stunning action female star in this movie and her stunts look so real and even better than Lora Craft, overall very good movie with great cast and story.
|10/10||shehzad720@ - first review|
5.2.2013 - age: 26-35
So boring! I was playing Angry Birds after the first 15 minutes.
|3/10||chwebb1@ - 259 reviews|
20.1.2013 - age: 1-12
What a stinker! It's a mystery how those big names got suckered into this disaster. I have seen weaker acting, but plots don't come much worse than this. At least the fight scenes were good and the lead looked her part, like a female Bourne. It's totally unclear why the bad guys were after her though. Camera work was lousy and so was the lighting, music too. There are definitely a few actors wishing they hadn't participated in this one!
|3/10||nanolovesjesus@ - 77 reviews|
9.6.2012 - age: 36-49
Cheesy, hard to follow, seemed like a poorly done, low-budget movie.
|2/10||book.boss@ - 36 reviews|
3.6.2012 - age: 50+
I kinda liked it. It was interesting enough for me. Nothing fancy or high tech, nice to see for a change.
|8/10||shazjoao@ - 1723 reviews|
A winter-season product, but perfectly absorbing once it gets going.
|7/10||buy1mtl@ - 5 reviews|
18.5.2012 - age: 26-35
With a talented director at the helm, a sexy leading lady and a mostly A list cast this should have a been a surefire success. Unfortunately not much about this film is particularly effective. UFC starlett Gina Carano can certainly handle herself during the hand to hand action scenes, but her lack of acting ability is a real drawback considering she's in almost every scene. Various talented actors in glorified cameos help a bit but Soderbergh's rigid, straight-laced approach really doesn't lend itself to the action medium, as a result the movie is never exiting, the kiss of death for any action film. A real letdown.
|5/10||jfichaud@ - 97 reviews|
16.5.2012 - age: 26-35
The pace was slow, and the acting was horrible. The story was nonexistent (at least for the first 52 minutes, which is when I finally gave up), and the action scenes were the worst I've seen in years. What a waste of time!
|3/10||zygoto78@ - 273 reviews|
3.5.2012 - age: 26-35
Great fights, very realistic, good action movie, worth the watch!
|10/10||mike_mcd@ - 21 reviews|
25.4.2012 - age: 26-35
I was bored with the movie. Couldn't really get into it.
|4/10||sacoca_@ - 653 reviews|
20.4.2012 - age: 26-35
If you like standard movies that explain everything for you, you'll find it frustrating. If you want a genuine mystery, with brilliant acting and an original visual style, don't miss it.
|8/10||thermary@ - first review|
14.3.2012 - age: 36-49
Another great movie by the talented young Director Steven Soderbergh. He has great camera angles, and unique cinematography. The fight scenes have fresh gritty realism that showcases Gina Carano's genuine fighting skills. You can see why she has won her championships in her fighting career. Good movie and deserves more buzz than it got.
|8/10||roy.vanluven@ - 9 reviews|
22.2.2012 - age: 50+
If your expecting a chick to perform some serious ass kick fighting scenes like you see in the trailer, then that's all it's maybe worth. I found the storyline confusing at times. Although I expected more, I liked Gina Carano's fight scenes.
|6/10||metalandy2000@ - 84 reviews|
12.2.2012 - age: 36-49
I'm a HUGE action fan, this movie was nothing close to what I expected. Not recommended. It would be a whole different story if Jason Staham or Marky Mark would of been part of this movie.
|3/10||mbourdeau@ - first review|
9.2.2012 - age: 18-25
A listless performance by these seasoned actors. A dumb down version of many similar plots/stories (Bourne Identity) Poor character development. It just didn't flow. Parents, please don't bring your young kids to see these type of violent films (at least 3 kids or more, 10 years and under were in the theatre; screaming and crying) Enjoy the show. I would pass on this one. Glad I attended Free with a gift pass.
|5/10||jdjefford@ - 187 reviews|
8.2.2012 - age: 36-49
Much better than given credit for, well worth the viewing!
|9/10||jimedgar2@ - 176 reviews|
5.2.2012 - age: 50+
Not a good story very boring, trailer is the best part of the movie, not as much action as I thought.
|4/10||country36@ - first review|
5.2.2012 - age: 36-49
The trailer is worse than the movie, I've not seen that for a while. Gina Carano is a credible action star. There is no blurry stunt double required. She's beating people up and she's good at it. I'm sure the other star's had stunt doubles that were bruised and sore. She's not only hot. She appears fit enough to make that a long weekend assignment. There is a running sequence where passers-by turn and watch her. No Hollywood female toothpick star can run like that. The movie has scenes that are unique, imaginative and lent a sense of reality. You just don't find that in standard Hollywood action movies. This director is good. If you want the same old flash bang, explode cartoon stuff, that is necessary because most stars aren't credible Martial Artists... the Hollywood pablum, this isn't it. Could Gina Carano kick Tom Cruise and Daniel Craig's butt? Probably, but she'd first have to dig them out of the snowbank they were hiding in. The sound quality clarity and volume is a weakness. The introductory scene needed to be re-shot up until the action starts. She should have had a silencer for one scene. She's new to acting and will only get better. This is a female action star that you'd actually hire to by your bodyguard. I know I would :) I predict a sequel.
|7/10||greystone223@ - 8 reviews|
5.2.2012 - age: 50+
Not sure why the general rating is so poor for this movie. I enjoyed it and will purchase when it is released. Fight scenes are well done, story line is logical but does require some thought. Acting is consistent with roles portrayed and I don't mind a female hero who from real life fight experience did a credible job particularly in the fight scenes. I guess I would advise to check the track record of the reviewer on this one before you decide to go/no go.
|7/10||stan.kopp@ - 62 reviews|
4.2.2012 - age: 50+
Terrible movie. Waste of an hour and a half. Don't do it!
|1/10||emily_crozier@ - first review|
3.2.2012 - age: 18-25
We left half way through... Horrible writing/characters/acting/action.
|1/10||jaelhenri@ - first review|
3.2.2012 - age: 18-25
If you love action then this is the movie for you, go see it!
|8/10||salt@ - first review|
3.2.2012 - age: 26-35
Anything redeeming about this movie was washed away with the amateur acting of Gina Carano... her martial arts skills clearly didn’t compensate. A B grade film with cameo roles of veteran actors...
|4/10||moontreevista@ - 5 reviews|
2.2.2012 - age: 36-49
Wow I really don't get the low rating... The movie was great... This is one of the rare time I would prefer there was more actions... Watching Gina Carano kicking kicking ass was worth the price of admission...
|7/10||sentenza99@ - 599 reviews|
2.2.2012 - age: 36-49
It's supposed to be a revenge story but it's tepid... the action is ok, the plot is ok. Go see it if someone else is paying or wait until it comes out on TV. You won't be missing out on much.
|5/10||ferling100@ - 47 reviews|
1.2.2012 - age: 26-35
O. k. I was expecting a female version of the "Bourne Identity" series but did not get that. Instead it had some LOL fight scenes, distracting and annoying music background. I did enjoy Gina Carano's running and jumping scenes, quite impressive. Yeah, save your $$.
|5/10||karen_lett@ - 361 reviews|
1.2.2012 - age: 36-49