








4.8| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
3 2 |
5.8 6 |
3 2 |
4.7 10 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
8 1 |
3.5 2 |
5 3 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
3 2 |
6.1 7 |
3.2 4 |
4.8 13 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
I had to stop after 30 minutes because I kept thinking I'm wasting my time. The pace is slow, the story is very ordinary, and I really didn't care what was going to happen.
| 4/10 | zygoto78@ - 273 reviews 18.3.2013 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
I like the story line. Sigourney Weaver is acting well in her role. Bruce [...] too fast. Henry is acting not too bad. He is the new generation of Bruce Wills.
| 8/10 | lifeandthecity@ - 42 reviews 15.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Set in stunning Spain with a lot of action and car chase scenes, stuff I don't generally go for in film. But it was great fun, and I'll see it again when it hits Pay Per View. Worth your time and money, no question.
| 7/10 | eng649@ - first review 15.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
The acting of Sigourney Weaver leaves much to be desired... clearly this was just a money role for her... as to Henry Cavill - well could somebody be much stiffer.. Story plot... has merits but clearly the movie did not have the funds to work on the plot in-depth.
| 6/10 | kryzzz@ - first review 14.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
I was expecting a lot more from this movie... acting was not good... came across as low budget movie... Not a typical Bruce Willis movie that's for sure.
| 4/10 | dzambus@ - 2 reviews 13.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I can't believe Bruce Willis was in this horrible movie. Terrible plot, terrible acting. Don't waste your money.
| 3/10 | bignj@ - 45 reviews 13.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Very disappointing. No character development at all. We barely get to know who's who. The reason for the big hunt or chase or whatever would have been better presented near the start, so we'd have a clue as to why everybody is getting kidnapped and/or shot. Willis and Weaver can act but they never had a chance. What a waste of two excellent actors. Poor script. Poor direction; another half hour might have given this movie a chance.
| 3/10 | chacha2@ - 34 reviews 12.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
The plot is thin in this one. You get thrown into action very quickly without being fully immersed into the plot as a viewer. The result is that the action is there but no one really cares for it. At least I didn't.
| 2/10 | sacoca_@ - 653 reviews 11.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I read some of the reviews but before I did I looked at the rating scale and was appalled. Before I even read any reviews, I thought to myself, it's probably because they didn't see enough of Bruce Willis. And wouldn't you know it, I was right as to how predictable people are. I wouldn't call it a masterpiece but it most certainly a very good movie, that truthfully could have used more story development. Henry Cavill did a great job in his role, and I thought Sigourney Weaver simply delicious in her part. The fact that Willis only had a ten minute part in the film only enhanced its enjoyment for me. It's not that I dislike him, but he's so bloody predictable in his approach to pretty much any role he's cast in. Set in stunning Spain with a lot of action and car chase scenes, stuff I don't generally go for in film. But it was great fun, and I'll see it again when it hits Pay Per View. Worth your time and money, no question.
| 7/10 | marbledoo@ - 2 reviews 10.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I enjoyed this movie. Some pretty good action in it. And once the action started it didn't seem to stop. I would have like to have seen more of Bruce Willis in this but Henry was pretty good as the hero. He showed some good range in his acting. Being frantic with worry, being scared [...] less because he has no clue why everything is happening. The confusion. I liked him in this and I'm interested to see how he is going to be as Superman next year. Sigourny Weaver was good in this too but she could have been better. I liked her better in her surprising role in Cabin In the Woods. It was a small part but definitely memorable. I'll be getting this movie when it comes out on DVD or Blu-Ray.
| 8/10 | dvlspice@ - 12 reviews 10.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Bruce Willis was in the movie for about 20 mins. Low budget acting followed by predictable action? And no thrills. Terrible. Avoid!! Do not even rent on a 99 cent DVD, waste of money!
| 1/10 | allburnedout@ - 17 reviews 9.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Bruce Willis plays a cameo role and the writing and dialogue are trash. I wish it had been rated prior to my trip to the theatre. Avoid at all cost.
| 3/10 | crookedfir@ - first review 9.9.2012 - age: 50+ |
Sigourny Weaver was lame, plus a terrible shooter for a CIA agent. Bruce Willis is an Icon but past his prime for these type of roles... needs to branch out now.
| 6/10 | hglcloutier@ - 5 reviews 9.9.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.