199 user reviews
7.3
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
9.2 4 |
8.9 13 |
6.2 30 |
5.7 22 |
7.8 9 |
7.6 5 |
6.9 83 |
| Women: Votes: |
9.3 3 |
8.5 24 |
7 25 |
7.6 34 |
7.5 11 |
8 4 |
7.7 102 |
| Total: Votes: |
9.3 7 |
8.7 39 |
6.5 57 |
7 61 |
7.2 22 |
7.8 9 |
7.3 199 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 199)
This thriller was pure genius. It does not hurt to be a little paranoid once in a while after all it pays off most of the times. Very suspenseful.
| 8/10 | shazjoao@ - 1726 reviews 13.3.2012 |
A lesson in "don't lose your cool" in what could happen to anyone... a break-in wherein someone is home. Now I sleep with both the cell phone and house phone at my bedside every night. I watched it with my kids... wouldn't want them to see it alone.
| 8/10 | inside_story@ - first review 6.4.2008 - age: 36-49 |
Great movie... Jodie Foster is amazing... A must see!
| 10/10 | michelle_wiseman33@ - 19 reviews 19.7.2007 - age: 36-49 |
Good design-some new ideas-passes the feeling-not a brilliant scenario-long.
| 6/10 | nassim_sedaghat@ - 15 reviews 1.11.2006 - age: 18-25 |
The movie was exciting and you never know whats going to happen when she trys to get out of the room.
| 9/10 | rchadburn@ - 2 reviews 3.8.2006 - age: 36-49 |
Like the French review, this reminded me of Home Alone 3, though even worse. So slow, so boring and no suspense... even lack of music throughout. Forest Whitaker had an ok role but the rest, especially Jared were C-level actor.
| 3/10 | chief@ - 2 reviews 5.1.2006 - age: 26-35 |
This movie moved me in many ways it kept me at the edge of my seat and also touched me at the core to see the mother daughter relationship.
| 8/10 | angele.clairoux@ - 2 reviews 27.11.2005 - age: 26-35 |
A fine example of David Fincher's masterpeices. Absolutely amazing camera work. Jodie Foster was great. Kristen Stuart was believable and very good. Slow to start with but picked up with lots of nail biting scenes. Brilliant movie to watch on a big screen.
| 10/10 | punkprincess8704@ - first review 28.10.2005 - age: 13-17 |
Good movie but could have been better, more suspensefull,... I think,. ,.. good rental.
| 6/10 | joblagdon@ - 238 reviews 2.3.2004 - age: 36-49 |
This movie was excellent! I couldn't believe Jodie Foster's work. This movie is my absolute favorite movie in the whole wide world and I hope Jodie Foster makes another movie like this, but not a sequel because it would suck. That Raul dude makes me mad by hitting Jodie Foster!!
| 10/10 | airforcenavy_33@ - first review 26.1.2004 - age: 1-12 |
The opening shots with the camera wandering through the house from floor to floor were mesermizing. The movie was solid throughout.
| 7/10 | mj_brown@ - 84 reviews 5.12.2003 - age: 50+ |
This movie was absolutely fabulous! Jodie Foster was amazing. I loved the camera work and there was so much suspense. Every second you're wondering what is going to happen next and you feel like you're right in the movie. I definitely recommend it to anyone that is the mood for a suspense movie with some excitement in it. It's not a scary movie at all but it is truely worth watching.
| 9/10 | summer_sunset17@ - first review 24.10.2003 - age: 13-17 |
Jodie Foster can make even a so so script seem great.
| 8/10 | chotson@ - 151 reviews 25.9.2003 - age: 36-49 |
The panic room was a riveting movie. It made you feel as though you were in the movie. Jodie Foster once again showed her fans she is a true action hero, and a fierce woman taking on those low down dirty scoundrouls.
| 10/10 | nickiew126@ - first review 25.8.2003 - age: 26-35 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The film maintains its thrill and interest till the last scene... the scene where Jodey Foster returns the thieves action by igniniting the gass and blowing them out' was the best of all scenes. I had thoroughly enjoyed the whole film.
| 8/10 | hinashakil_2k@ - first review 30.5.2003 - age: 26-35 |
I don't understand how anyone could be bored during this movie. It was very suspenseful and I enjoyed it - except for all the swearing. I go to the movies once or twice a week so I am getting quite knowledgeable about what works and what doesn't. I think this movie worked well and of course having Jodie Foster in it didn't hurt.
| 7/10 | jdbecker@ - 92 reviews 22.3.2003 - age: 50+ |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
What about the ending? Nobody figured that out? You aren't careful watchers. The ending is strong. But you need to use that brain (this little thing right there behind your eyes) Think again about that last scene where the music gets louder, the camera closes up to Foster. Think about why Whitaker returned, why so many cops where there so fast. I am sure you get the answer, good luck!!
| 8/10 | mfhih22@ - first review 26.11.2002 - age: 18-25 |
Excellent psychological thriller! The main characters are truly convincing in their acting as they work out such an interesting situation -it surely demands good acting skills and a good management of cameras and timing in order to carry out all that film just within four walls!!! This is just another masterful show of creativity!!!
| 10/10 | ggarideleon@ - first review 21.10.2002 - age: 26-35 |
Unfortunately not well paced. This is a Cujo remake with the Black Dog instead of the St-Bernard as the terror. The scenario is simplistic; which you forgive since the focus is on the suspense but Jodie Foster is not well cast in this role of a tough but confused women. The frustrations you experience when she makes the numerous mistakes that miraculously have no impacts are not compensated by the few good moves she pulls out. They made her too bold as she does not think 10 secs before jeopardizing her security and mostly her childs. For those who like all the aspects of movie making, the movie is still worth it for the superb cinematography and some of the best long camera shots Ive seen lately (efficient usage of CGI to create seamless fluidity of long shots)
| 6/10 | toby.lamontagne@ - 12 reviews 1.10.2002 - age: 26-35 |
I have seen the movie twice, once when it first came out and then about a week ago. I enjoyed the movie, however found it pretty predictable in parts. Nice to see it on the big screen, but if I had it to do over again would not pay full price.
| 7/10 | doubleddiver@ - first review 8.7.2002 - age: 26-35 |
Great movie, not a supernatural thriller as I thought it was but it was good, kept me guessing as to what was going to happen next...
| 9/10 | sweetejt@ - 8 reviews 27.6.2002 - age: 26-35 |
This movie was stupid to say the least- any half intelligent female would be able to figure out how to save herself without resorting to the apparently mindless antics Jodie's character did. I was so frustrated at the end that someone could be so brainless. Don't go see this- it is barely worth even renting.
| 3/10 | brucie00@ - first review 23.6.2002 - age: 18-25 |
Just one word: excellent!!! Jodi Foster : as usual (good actrice) whoooaw.
| 8/10 | lilou1321@ - first review 17.6.2002 - age: 18-25 |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Never had seen a such stupid movie like this. I wonder if something goes wrong with director. She can open the door for her cellfone to hook the signal. She called 911 and hang up "police did not come bcz they dun know the address" (hahaha) instead of calling police she calls her ex smart muscle husband, asking him coming to save the world ^^. lot of ppl rate this movie as a good one, I can not understand this!!
| 2/10 | kevinn79@ - first review 2.6.2002 - age: 18-25 |
I really wanted to see the movie so I dragged all my friends to go watch it with me omg it was soooo boring you die, please do not go watch it waste of time and waste of money...
| 1/10 | melissalovesenrique@ - first review 29.5.2002 - age: 18-25 |
Jodie Foster is a very talented actress. The movie is a must see. I loved every second of it.
| 10/10 | monkey_love6@ - first review 27.5.2002 - age: 18-25 |
I LOVED THIS MOVIE! You wouldn't think that 2 people locked in a tiny room the whole time would be a very interesting movie... well if that's what you thought then you were wrong! This was a great movie and Kristen Stewart is an anwesome actor! I hope to see her in more movies! Is all I can say is DEFINITELY go see this movie! It's definitely worth all your money and all your time!
| 10/10 | danielle_b3@ - 9 reviews 21.5.2002 - age: 13-17 |
This movie was GREAT! Very suspensful through out the movie. The only down part was that the movie made us care a bit for one of the robbers and didn't let us know about what happend to him at the end.
| 8/10 | missgoalie1@ - first review 17.5.2002 - age: 13-17 |
Jodie Foster was brilliant as always. Suspensful although thought the ending was a bit weak.
| 7/10 | cmiskow@ - first review 16.5.2002 - age: 36-49 |
For me this was one of those films that your friends drag you to see because they want to see it; not one that I wanted to see myself. AND then you're glad they did!!! I really enjoyed this film. Lots of suspense.
| 8/10 | dominionite@ - 7 reviews 14.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
It was a great thriller. I was jumping out of my seat, very nerve wrecking. It was worth seeing. I love the suspence!!
| 7/10 | cindycwhite@ - first review 14.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
Every once in a while a mediocre movie comes out even with known actors. Panic Room is the case. As I sat through the movie, I couldn't stop thinking how they could've made the movie more interesting. The concept started out well, only to falter throughout the minutes of boredom. Don't expect much suspense, nor much excitement. Panic room can be compared to a soda without the bubbles.
| 4/10 | neosoprano@ - 10 reviews 13.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
Jody Jody Jody, what depths have you stooped to. You really should have done Hannibal, it had twice the suspence and shock factor than this predictable waste of celuloid with it's bumbling bad guys, Mcaully Calkin and the wet bandits would have fit in well.
| 5/10 | aazriel@ - first review 13.5.2002 - age: 36-49 |
A good movie, Jodie Foster in another 'heroin' role is always convincing.
| 7/10 | nadiaterrazzini@ - 4 reviews 12.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
It was okay... I gess... I think it was kinda fake the acting... but whatever... go and see it if you have nothing to do. But in the end it's not that bad.
| 7/10 | fun_angel88@ - 2 reviews 8.5.2002 - age: 13-17 |
Very suspense filled movie, Jody Foster does a great job.
| 9/10 | niioieren@ - first review 8.5.2002 - age: 50+ |
Dumb Dumb Dumb... one of those movies where you say... why doesn't she just do that... problem solved... or why don't they just shoot them... problem solved... dumb dumb dumb.
| 4/10 | kingray@ - 4 reviews 8.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
I can't believe Jodie Foster passed up the chance to head the Board of Judges at the Cannes Film Festival to film this. Such a disappointing film. Fincher's camerawork was the only saving grace.
| 5/10 | melodility@ - first review 8.5.2002 - age: 18-25 |
I really enjoyed the suspense of the movie. Jodie Foster was great as usual and the fact that she was pregnant during the filming, it was fun to try and see where they are trying to hide this fact.
| 7/10 | vvriniotis@ - 18 reviews 2.5.2002 - age: 26-35 |
It was a great thriller, kept me on my seat the whole time. I totally recommend it.
| 9/10 | annetteduffy5131@ - first review 30.4.2002 - age: 26-35 |
Great cinematography!! Great house!! Great Jodi!! OK story.
| 6/10 | shawn1582@ - first review 29.4.2002 - age: 26-35 |
10/10 an amazing movie, intense thriller very good ending Jodie Foster stays true to her talent go see it.
| 10/10 | loline2@ - 2 reviews 29.4.2002 - age: 18-25 |
This movie was slightly better than Nell and a lot worse than Silence of the Lambs. Umm... Jodie, why was it that you didn't want to work in Hannibal? The only Panic I had was to get out of the room ASAP. Is Nell 2 in the works?
| 6/10 | derekfavretto@ - first review 27.4.2002 - age: 26-35 |
I though it was really good. I also thought that all the actors played well their parts.
| 10/10 | dodocm@ - 4 reviews 27.4.2002 - age: 13-17 |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Did you see ''The Panic Room''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
