72 user reviews
6.3
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
5 1 |
6 2 |
- 0 |
5.9 7 |
5.1 7 |
6 3 |
5.6 20 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
7 6 |
6.7 8 |
7.2 12 |
6.1 12 |
6.2 9 |
6.6 48 |
| Total: Votes: |
5 1 |
7 9 |
6.7 8 |
6.5 21 |
5.7 19 |
6.2 12 |
6.3 72 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 72)
It was not a bad movie overall. Nice, lite and no nonsense kinda movie. I liked it as I found it to be fun.
| 7/10 | shazjoao@ - 1728 reviews 18.3.2013 |
The trailer looked funny so I gave it a try. The movie is boring. Some little funny parts but cheap. Don't waste your money! Wait till it's to rent.
| 4/10 | lance.g2012@ - 45 reviews 2.2.2013 - age: 13-17 |
Boring. Guys hate pregnant ladies. It's always about them, and no comedy or horror, or something!
| 5/10 | chw@ - 262 reviews 20.1.2013 - age: 1-12 |
Not a comedy, not romantic. It's (obviously) about expecting a baby. The "original" idea here is that all the couples are expecting differently. It could be because I'm a man, but I wasn't impressed with it.
| 6/10 | zygoto78@ - 273 reviews 14.10.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Watched this on a plane and thought it was pathetic. When a movie doesn't entertain you on a plane, you know it's bad!! They had so much to work with and it just was stupid rather than funny! With this and Bad Teacher, Cameron Diaz is hitting rock bottom.
| 3/10 | dfontyn@ - first review 4.8.2012 - age: 50+ |
I went in not expecting much. I was pleasantly surprised. It's not bad. It even makes you laugh a few time.
| 7/10 | luvthemovies@ - 11 reviews 20.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Funny movie if you have had kids or pregnant. Chris Rock and the guys made the movie!
| 7/10 | elafunk@ - 3 reviews 18.6.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I took my spouse to this movie and she was humming and was not sure to see this movie. She and I really enjoyed this movie and it had lots of good laughs.
| 8/10 | army_and_trucker@ - 291 reviews 17.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
My friends and I have seen this movie twice now. It is a movie that you're smiling the whole way through and you will be entertained the entire time. Go see it if you want to watch something that will make you happy!
| 10/10 | edouc@ - 3 reviews 16.6.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Had a few pretty funny parts but wasn't as funny I expected. Worth watching though.
| 6/10 | haddisonas@ - 13 reviews 14.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Mind you I went in with low expectations as this was the wife's pick. I found it really funny and entertaining. Chris Rock was funny as usual as well as the other men part of the Saturday Dude group.
| 7/10 | unitz3@ - 44 reviews 14.6.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was ok, Not as funny as I thought it would be.
| 5/10 | coolrebecca1998@ - first review 12.6.2012 - age: 13-17 |
It is a good comedy, the actors are great and the story is ok.
| 7/10 | mariette.robichaud@ - 286 reviews 11.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
This movie far exceeded my expectations. It was hillariously funny yet poignant at the same time. Great casting as well. Go see it!!
| 10/10 | betannmeow@ - 8 reviews 8.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Not as bad as the poor ratings show. I guess a lot of people are anti parenting or something. It had some funny moments, especially with the dad gang.
| 7/10 | ditiberia@ - 81 reviews 7.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I'm not sure why there were so many different stories going on. The movie would have been just fine without many of the characters. Elizabeth Banks was the standout in this. It was okay, had some genuinely funny moments and a lot of "why? " moments. I felt that the only reason the dad group was part of the plot was to make men want to see it and keep women from having to drag their man along. The funniest character in that group was the little boy getting into trouble constantly. Overall a good movie just a bit cloying.
| 6/10 | eldubu@ - 2 reviews 6.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
This movie is so funny! It's one of the best 'chick-flick' comedies I've seen in a long time! I highly recommend!!!
| 9/10 | alleigh_knox@ - first review 3.6.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Don't expect a pure comedy. This is geared towards Adults. Probably not a good movie for the kids to see. This has a little excitement, mostly drama, and some comedy. Good enough to see in the theatres, might rent it when it comes to DVD.
| 7/10 | k.c_chief58@ - 2 reviews 31.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I loved the trailers and I loved the movie! Laughed a lot, liked the acting and the actors. Definitely worth to see it!
| 8/10 | wuschelcorinchen@ - 2 reviews 31.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I am not a fussy movie-goer but this movie was not good. Even if you went to see it pregnant, it is still not worth your while.
| 2/10 | happy-campers3@ - 19 reviews 31.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Watch the the trailer and skip the movie and you will get all the funny parts and only waste 3 minutes of you life.
| 1/10 | nathanhopp@ - 5 reviews 30.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
This movie was slow, and not worth the money to get into see it. Perhaps a renter but certainly save your money on this one.
| 2/10 | brentturville@ - 57 reviews 29.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It brought back some good memories from when I was pregnant... with twins! I enjoyed lots of laughs and it was one of those movies that you could just sit back versus trying to read into it.
| 7/10 | lesleydls@ - 8 reviews 29.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
OH MY this was a waste of time! This movies was slower than molasses and had ridiculous story lines! Not worth the eight bucks at all! This was not at all a movie JLo should be proud of being a part of! Go to the dentist instead, you would have a better time! We walked out after 40min. Along with others as well!
| 2/10 | dgardengrl@ - 23 reviews 28.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
I go to LOTS of movies and this one was very refreshing. I laughed the whole time, enjoyed and would see it again! A must for any parent especially!
| 9/10 | jennyphayward@ - 2 reviews 28.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was more serious than the ads lead you to believe. I thought it was a comedy, and there was some funny parts.
| 7/10 | nana@ - first review 28.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Could not stop laughing, a great chick flick, with plenty of laughs for a reluctant boyfriend!!
| 8/10 | ruka29hawkes@ - first review 28.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Movie was okay, for a movie packed with many good actors expected more... Would not see again. Predictable.
| 6/10 | madison_babe_95@ - 7 reviews 28.5.2012 - age: 13-17 |
This was as great as bridesmaids. Really great adaptation. Full of laughs!
| 10/10 | ldappleby@ - 33 reviews 27.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
We were told it was a bad film. We went anyway. If you're educated and like to see movies that are well written, well acted and somewhat entertaining... DO NOT see this film. Save your time and money.
| 1/10 | lvernnn@ - first review 27.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Me and my friend loved this movie, we laughed a lot... some scenes did make me teary being a first time mom and you can relate.
| 8/10 | muneeba_16@ - first review 27.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
A bunch of recognized but not good actresses. A story without any meaning, stories that do not relate. Wait until you can see it at home and do not pay for it. The worst movie for Cameron Diaz.
| 5/10 | arymb@ - 55 reviews 27.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
They had a great idea, but they could've done much more with it. The movie had some funny parts but most of them were in the trailer. Overall not a bad movie but maybe wait until you can rent it.
| 6/10 | so-sweet13@ - 41 reviews 27.5.2012 - age: 13-17 |
This movie was way funnier than I expected it to be.
| 8/10 | pascal_alison@ - first review 26.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Loved this movie, was a great night out and had quite a few laughs!
| 8/10 | whitec1981@ - 9 reviews 26.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was very funny. I think it was worth the ticket price. It is more of a chick movie, but my husband said it was pretty good for a chick film.
| 7/10 | ange@ - 12 reviews 26.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It made me laugh on a very dark day... and made me cry because I was able to relive the birth of my children.
| 9/10 | daveandrach112@ - first review 26.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Well, I'm biased because my stepdaughter and I are in the Business Expo scene with Elizabeth Banks, right before she gave birth, but it was a very enjoyable movie. Great characters -- Dennis Quaid was a riot, as was Chris Rock, and the super female trio of Lopez, Diaz, and Banks were very real and believable.
| 8/10 | wsdj@ - first review 24.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Nothing like the trailers, movie was boring with almost no funny parts. Not worth watching.
| 5/10 | info@ - first review 24.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
Loved it! It had everything, and wasn't simply a happy cheesy movie.
| 8/10 | jules@ - 3 reviews 23.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Thought that with such a great cast, the movie would be alot funnier... not so much!! A few laughs, but too few to recommend this movie ;- (
| 6/10 | clramjam1@ - 7 reviews 23.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
The very last scene was the best part of the whole movie. Lots of good actors but the storyline wasn't very good. Definitely the best laughs are in the trailor. Oh well it was still a night out!
| 5/10 | sandydeclare@ - 10 reviews 23.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
It's a cute and funny movie and there're parts that make u cry. What better to expect from a chick flick. Good movie to watch with your spouse if u have kids or planning to, either than that guy won't like this movie.
| 8/10 | sandravonrep@ - 20 reviews 23.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
Great movie. Strong cast. Very funny and very true...
| 9/10 | skishep@ - first review 22.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Wait for video. Saw it in cheapie Tuesday and still thought I overpaid.
| 3/10 | princess@ - first review 22.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-72]
Did you see ''What to Expect When You're Expecting''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
