91 user reviews
5.9
/10
| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
6 1 |
7.5 2 |
5.9 10 |
5.5 11 |
6 4 |
5.9 28 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
9.5 2 |
5.9 10 |
7.6 14 |
4.7 12 |
5.3 20 |
6 58 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
8.3 3 |
6.2 12 |
6.9 24 |
5.1 25 |
5.3 26 |
5.9 91 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 91)
Wow, people are very difficult with this movie. I enjoyed it, even if the 3rd quarter was a bit long and a little depressing. There were funny moments through out, which I find rare in romcom these days.
| 8/10 | zygoto78@ - 273 reviews 30.9.2012 - age: 26-35 |
It was what it was, as in real life as can be I suppose but many people do not want to see the reality of life and its ups and downs so to speak and that is why many did not take to it. There were few laughs here and there but overall it was okay could have used a bit of a picker upper but apart from that can't complain.
| 6/10 | shazjoao@ - 1723 reviews 12.8.2012 |
This was the most vulgar, offensive boring movie I think I have ever been to. If they can't do better than this they shouldn't bother. Language unbelievably bad and stupid plot that never seemed to end. Finally just walked out!
| 1/10 | burlshirt103@ - first review 7.7.2012 - age: 50+ |
I really enjoyed this movie. My age group has so far rated it low and I can't figure out why. What I really liked about the story was that it was not a fairy tale love story, it was much more like real life. And the jokes in it made me laugh and laugh.
| 8/10 | sweetc@ - 2 reviews 2.7.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I guess I wasn't expecting much from this so that's why I enjoyed it mostly. A few problems I had was the story jumped around so much it seemed like and it wasn't needed, all it did was make the movie DRAG on forever, it seemed like it was soo long, my legs started to hurt and I wanted to leave. Not a great sign. But it did have some really good laughs and I love Segal movies, not a terrible movie.
| 6/10 | jer_duarte@ - 92 reviews 27.6.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I don't get why people didn't like this movie. I went with my girlfriends and we were laughing the entire time; so was everyone in the theatre.
| 10/10 | meow@ - first review 23.6.2012 - age: 26-35 |
The acting was very good, the chemistry between Emily and Jason was very good I thought it was very funny and I was not disappointed. Everybody in the theater was laughing, some people are hard to please I guess. It was great and I'd see it again.
| 8/10 | idonda@ - 35 reviews 19.6.2012 - age: 50+ |
Stupid story, superficial, unrealistic, everyting was exaggerated,... horrible.
| 2/10 | nabican74@ - 30 reviews 9.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I couldn't help thinking the entire time that this storyline has been done over and over and over again. The actors were amazing though.
| 5/10 | freebj@ - 9 reviews 2.6.2012 - age: 36-49 |
When I saw the advertisement, I expected it's very interesting movie. But it's not so good than I expected.
| 5/10 | holiday.g2@ - 2 reviews 2.6.2012 - age: 18-25 |
It's a nice movie to see. It's not one of the big blockbusters and you really have to go see it without any expectations. Then it's fun. It's worth seeing it if you want to see a nice movie with good acting and some fun.
| 7/10 | wuschelcorinchen@ - 2 reviews 31.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Embarrassingly not funny and pointless. It seemed to last for hours.
| 3/10 | lorraineinportmoody@ - first review 31.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
My daughter & I saw it together & thoroughly enjoyed it - silly fun humour.
| 9/10 | starbbycat@ - 4 reviews 30.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Definitely more serious than I expected and yes a little slow at times. The whole thing felt like 5 minutes (... underwater... lol).. Had to do that one liner :) I liked the realistic dynamic between the leads as a couple (i. e the trials and tribulations)
| 5/10 | rubix_world@ - 73 reviews 25.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Overall it was alright. It dragged on for a long time though I felt like I was in the theater for hours. Also there was little background music which made it even slower. Few funny parts, there were only a few scenes I actually enjoyed. I wouldn't recommend seeing it in theaters... more of a movie to watch when bored and nothing to do.
| 5/10 | laurelpuppy@ - 15 reviews 23.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
I didn't expect much from this movie and so I wasn't all that disappointed. The whole thing is exactly like the title says and just drags on. It's just barely entertaining. Don't even waste your money on renting it.
| 4/10 | xo.cupcakes@ - 7 reviews 22.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
One of the worst movies I've ever seen - very slow, boring, poor acting and their attempts at being funny... were not. The only part I enjoyed was the last 5 min... now if only the whole movie could have been like that. Not worth the money.
| 2/10 | sue_ooq@ - first review 21.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
It certainly felt like 5 very long years. The movie had funny moments, too bad most of them were in the trailers. It wasn't what I expected... much more serious than is advertised. But way too full of sophomoric humor.
| 4/10 | jaime@ - 4 reviews 21.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I loved this movie! Although marketed as a comedy, it is more of a drama with a few really funny parts. It had a few great relationship truths in it.
| 8/10 | lisasharp@ - 4 reviews 19.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Pleasantly surprised! Was not expecting much but the entire movie was entertaining and funny. Emily Blunt is extremely cute. I recommend it for a fun evening out with the girls.
| 8/10 | mm13@ - 18 reviews 18.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
The only funny parts were in the trailers... much too long a movie... 5 year engagement felt like 20 year engagement! 2 hours of my life I"ll never get back.
| 4/10 | cisa45@ - 2 reviews 18.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Enjoyed the humor and irony in this film. Enjoyed the acting. Too much nudity... I would have enjoyed it as much without the nudity.
| 7/10 | lillyward5@ - first review 18.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Good movie for couples who are planning to get married!!
| 10/10 | hishammuthana@ - first review 14.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
This movie sucked big time. I wasted my money on this one, don't go see it.
| 1/10 | angell_melissa@ - 2 reviews 13.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
If you think this is a romcom, you're wrong turn away and don't look back... Best thing about the movie was the trailers, the movie itself was so depressing...
| 4/10 | sentenza99@ - 599 reviews 13.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
My husband and I really enjoyed this movie. It was very funny and entertaining.
| 8/10 | elaine@ - 11 reviews 13.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
I almost fall asleep during this movie. If I have to look at Jason's bottom one more time I might freak, he does it in all his movies, or so it seems. The plot was supposed to be funny but it uses swear words to try and make it funny. The show was just lame.
| 4/10 | maruce@ - 8 reviews 11.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Overall, not a great movie. Some funny parts, but not enough to keep me interested. Thought about walking out, but decided to stay till the end. Movie really didn't get any better.
| 4/10 | julie_quevillon@ - first review 11.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Wasted two hours of my life... too long. Funniest parts were shown in the commercials. Don't waste your time.
| 4/10 | cisa@ - 4 reviews 11.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
This movie starts off ok the first few minutes, however it gets worst and worst and the stupidity of it all made me leave before the end!
| 1/10 | h.ravenda@ - 2 reviews 11.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
This was the wife’s pick. It was a long 2 hours. At least it was more of a comedy than a romance, but the laughs where still few and far between. All in all not horrible but not great; hence, the 5 out of 10 rating.
| 5/10 | unitz3@ - 44 reviews 10.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
The movie was Okay? It could've been better!
| 6/10 | thtriantafyllidis@ - 29 reviews 10.5.2012 - age: 13-17 |
Really? Can anyone say this movie was funny? It was so poorly written and the 'jokes' at times felt desperate. It felt like a bunch of one liners pasted together, not having any consistent relation to the character speaking them... especially the character of Audrey, the young gf... if she found 'old' people so disgusting, then what was she doing with one?! Dumb is the word that best describes this movie.
| 2/10 | disappointed@ - first review 10.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Funny, but way too long... Should be reduced about a half hour.
| 6/10 | 19mikep79@ - 4 reviews 9.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
A believable story of love, compromise and the pressure put on engaged couples. But so funny.
| 8/10 | mackeya@ - 3 reviews 9.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
I loved this movie... laughed and cried. Definitely a chick flick but a great one!
| 9/10 | anne@ - first review 8.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I liked it. It was a charming, enjoyable movie, well worth seeing. I think the problem with the ratings is that it was played up as an outright comedy... which it isn't. There definitely were funny bits but there was tragedy and pathos as well. It added up to a well rounded, well played, interesting movie... not a laugh riot by any means. It was as much a drama as a comedy and if watched with that in mind, you are much more likely to enjoy the movie.
| 7/10 | joekanuck@ - 58 reviews 7.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
This movie was just another so so not so funny flick. It would at best, be a renter. Save your money.
| 2/10 | brentturville@ - 57 reviews 6.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
There were some really funny parts, but the movie dragged on and was a bit on the long side. I wouldn't buy this movie, but it's worth seeing once for a great laugh.
| 6/10 | chelsea.oleary@ - 5 reviews 6.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
From start to finish there was something to laugh about. Good girls movie.
| 6/10 | keeponsmiling@ - 13 reviews 6.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Wow, such opposite reviews for this movie, I feel like we didn't all see the same show or all of the 10 ratings with the 'best comedy of the year' and 'amazing movie' are written by employees of the production company. I feel generous giving it a 4, but there were times I laughed out loud because I am a sucker for low brow prat fall humour. So many holes in the premise you could drive a truck through and just... so disappointing.
| 4/10 | disappointed@ - first review 5.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Very lame dialogue and waste of time. A real snooze-fest so bring your pillow and blanket.
| 2/10 | joeljustleft@ - 269 reviews 5.5.2012 - age: 26-35 |
I was disappointed in this flic. Not very funny at all, and very awkward and slow in places. What a shame.
| 3/10 | jilljustleft@ - 308 reviews 5.5.2012 - age: 18-25 |
My wife and I wanted to walk our 3/4 of the way through. This is a bad movie. We are fans of many of these comic actors, what a waste of talent. If I had rented this movie, I would have turned it off 1/2 way through. Terrible.
| 3/10 | soggytrudy@ - 5 reviews 4.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
If you like rom-coms or dromedies, then you will probably like this one. Yes... it's too long, but very watchable. Emily Blunt and Jason Segel are very watchable. Set agains the backdrop of San Francisco and Michigan--very nice to watch too. It's about the evolution and changes to relationships and the impact of sacrificing one person's aspirations for their partners. It's also about over-thinking making a commitment. I definitely liked it. It kept my attention the whole time and I had a few laughs. Sure it got very silly at times, but overall... entertaining with a message.
| 7/10 | helenl8@ - 80 reviews 4.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Had its moments but way too long. Wanted to see more of Tom's chef friend and Violet's sister (and none of that boring psychology crowd) Made it through 85% of the movie before leaving. Here is a question for you, was Tom's downward spiral really a result of switching restaurants... or was the cause his change from a high protein northwest diet to a high carb eastern diet?
| 6/10 | parttimepainter@ - 75 reviews 4.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
I am so disappointed. I thought this was going to be a cute little movie and it was not. What a waste of two hours.
| 4/10 | lintr@ - first review 3.5.2012 - age: 36-49 |
Better than I thought it would be. Very funny, lol, kind of movie. It fact everyone in the theatre that night, laughed out loud several times. I enjoyed it.
| 7/10 | jcacheson@ - first review 3.5.2012 - age: 50+ |
Note: User reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our readers. We are not responsible for their content.
Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]
[51-91]
Did you see ''The Five-Year Engagement''?
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2013 CinemaClock Canada Inc.
